ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Incremental formalization with the hyper-object substrate
Full text PdfPdf (920 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) archive
Volume 17 ,  Issue 2  (April 1999) table of contents
Pages: 199 - 227  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISSN:1046-8188
Authors
Frank M. Shipman, III  Texas A&M University
Raymond J. McCall  University of Colorado
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 40,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/306686.306690
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Computers require formally represented information to perform computations that support users; yet users who have needed such support have often proved to be unable or unwilling to formalize it. To address this problem, this article introduces an approach called incremental formalization, in which, first, users express information informally and then the system aids them in formalizing it. Incremental formalization requires a system architecture the (1) integrates formal and informal representations and (2) supports progressive formalization of information. The system should have both tools to capture naturally available informal information and techniques to suggest possible formalizations of this information. The hyper-object substrate (HOS) was developed to satisfy these requirements. HOS has been applied to a number of problem domains, including network design, archeological site analysis, and neuroscience education. Users have been successful in adding informal information and then later formalizing it incrementally with the aid of the system. Our experience with HOS has reaffirmed the need for information spaces to evolve during use and has identified additional considerations in the design and instantiation of systems enabling and supporting incremental formalization


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
4
 
5
CHOMSKY, N. 1956. Three models for the description of language. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. 2, 3, 113-124.
 
6
CONKLIN, E. J. AND BURGESS YAKEMOVIC, K. C. 1991. A process-oriented approach to design rationale. Hum. Comp. Inter. 6, 3-4, 357-391.
7
 
8
FISCHER, G., GRUDIN, J., LEMKE, A., MCCALL, R., OSTWALD, J., REEVES, B., AND SHIPMAN, F. 1992. Supporting indirect, collaborative design with integrated knowledge-based design environments. Hum. Comput. Interact. 7, 3, 281-314.
 
9
FISCHER, G., LEMKE, A. C., MCCALL, R., AND MORCH, A. 1991. Making argumentation serve design. Hum. Comput. Interact. 6, 3-4, 393-419.
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
GROSS, M. D. 1996. The Electronic cocktail napkin--Computer support for working with diagrams. Des. Stud. 17, 1, 53-69.
14
15
16
 
17
18
 
19
LETHBRIDGE, T. C. AND SKUCE, D. 1992. Informality in knowledge exchange. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Representation Aspects of Knowledge Acquisition. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.
20
21
22
23
24
 
25
MCCALL, R., MISTRICK, I., AND SCHULER, W. 1991. An integrated information and communication system for problem solving: Basic concepts, data for science and technology. In Proceedings of the 7th International CODATA Conference. 107-115.
 
26
MCCALL, R., BENNETT, P., AND JOHNSON, E. 1994. An overview of the PHIDIAS II HyperCAD System, reconnecting. In Proceedings of ACADIA '94. 63-74.
 
27
 
28
MUNDIE, D. n. AND SHULTIS, J. C., Eds. 1991. Proceedings of the Workshop on Informal Computing.
29
 
30
POLANYI, M. 1996. The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, New York, NY.
 
31
32
 
33
RITTEL, H. 1984. Second generation design methods. In Developments in Design Methodology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 317-327.
34
 
35
SCHOEN, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY.
 
36
 
37
 
38
SHIPMAN, F. M. AND MARSHALL, C. C. 1993. Formality considered harmful: Experiences, emerging themes, and directions. Tech. Rep. CU-CS-648-93. Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO.
39
40
 
41
 
42
43

CITED BY  9


REVIEW

"Christopher Fox : Reviewer"

The term “formalization” is used here in the sense of “recording detailed information explicitly for computational processing” rather than in the sense of “stating with mathematical rigor.” In s  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Frank M. Shipman, III: colleagues
Raymond J. McCall: colleagues