A replication approach to interval estimation in simulation

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback
Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

A replication approach to interval estimation in simulation

Full text

Pdf (593 KB)

Source

Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 23rd conference on Winter simulation table of contents

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Pages: 1023 - 1029

Year of Publication: 1991

ISBN:0-7803-0181-1

Authors

M. Murat Köksalan	Industrial Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University, 06531 Ankara, Turkey and Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Nail Basöz	Industrial Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University, 06531 Ankara, Turkey

Sponsors

IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
SCS : Society for Computer Simulation
ASA : American Statistical Association
NIST : National Institue of Standards & Technology
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-SMCS : Systems, Man & Cybernetics Society
ORSA : Operations Research Society of America
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
TIMS :

Publisher

IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 0, Downloads (12 Months): 4, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Paul Bratley , Bennett L. Fox , Linus E. Schrage, A guide to simulation (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, 1987
	2	George S. Fishman, Principles of Discrete Event Simulation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1978
	3	Deligonul, Z.S. 1987. Antithetic Bias Reduction for Discrete-Event Simulations. Journal of Operational Research Society 38:431-437.
	4	Gafarian, A.V., C.J. Ancker, Jr., and T. Morisaku. 1978. Evaluation of Commonly Used Rules for Detecting 'Steady State' in Computer Simulation. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 25:511-529.
	5	Kelton, W.D. 1989. Random Initialization Methods in Simulation. lie Transactions 21: 355-367.
	6	Kelton, W.D. and A.M. Law. 1983. A New Approach for Dealing with the Startup Problem in Discrete Event Simulation. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 30:641-658.
	7	Kelton, W.D. and A.M. Law. 1984. An Analytical Evaluation of Alternative Strategies in Steady-State Simulation. Operations Research 32: 169-184.
	8	Kelton, W.D. and A.M. Law. 1985. The Transient Behavior of the M/M/s Queue, with Implications for Steady-State Simulation. Operations Research 33: 378-396.
	9	Averill M. Law , W. David Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 1997
	10	Sargent, R.G., K. Kang, and D.M. Goldsman. 1988. An Investigation of Finite Sample Behavior of Confidence Interval Estimation Procedures. Working Paper, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York.
	11	Schruben, L.W. 1982. Detecting Initialization Bias in Simulation Output. Operations Research 30: 569- 590.
	12	Schruben, L., H. Singh, and L. Tierney. 1983. Optimal Tests for Initialization Bias in Simulation Output. Operations Research 31:1167-1178.
	13	Schmeiser, B. 1990. Simulation Experiments. In Handbooks in OR & MS, v.2: Stochastic Models, eds. D. Heyman and M.J. Sobel, 295-330, Amsterdam: North Holland.
	14	Turnquist, M.A. and J.M. Sussman. 1977. Toward Guidelines for Designing Experiments in Queueing Simulation. Simulation 28: 137-144.
	15	Wilson, J.R. and A.A.B. Pritsker. 1978a. A Survey of Research on the Simulation Startup Problem. Simulation 31: 55-58.
	16	Wilson, J.R. and A.A.B. Pritsker. 1978b. Evaluation of Startup Policies in Simulation Experiments. Simulation 31: 79-89.