ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A comparison of selectivity estimators for range queries on metric attributes
Full text PdfPdf (1.53 MB)
Source International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data table of contents
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 239 - 250  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISBN:1-58113-084-8
Also published in ...
Authors
Björn Blohsfeld  Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik, University of Marburg
Dieter Korus  Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik, University of Marburg
Bernhard Seeger  Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik, University of Marburg
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 52,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/304182.304203
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a comparison of nonparametric estimation methods for computing approximations of the selectivities of queries, in particular range queries. In contrast to previous studies, the focus of our comparison is on metric attributes with large domains which occur for example in spatial and temporal databases. We also assume that only small sample sets of the required relations are available for estimating the selectivity. In addition to the popular histogram estimators, our comparison includes so-called kernel estimation methods. Although these methods have been proven to be among the most accurate estimators known in statistics, they have not been considered for selectivity estimation of database queries, so far. We first show how to generate kernel estimators that deliver accurate approximate selectivities of queries. Thereafter, we reveal that two parameters, the number of samples and the so-called smoothing parameter, are important for the accuracy of both kernel estimators and histogram estimators. For histogram estimators, the smoothing parameter determines the number of bins (histogram classes). We first present the optimal smoothing parameter as a function of the number of samples and show how to compute approximations of the optimal parameter. Moreover, we propose a new selectivity estimator that can be viewed as an hybrid of histogram and kernel estimators. Experimental results show the performance of different estimators in practice. We found in our experiments that kernel estimators are most efficient for continuously distributed data sets, whereas for our real data sets the hybrid technique is most promising.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
4
5
6
 
7
8
9
 
10
Gasser, T. & Engel, J. & Seifert, B. ,,Nonparametric function estimation" in: Rao (Ed.),"Handbook of Sta.tistics Vol. 9", North Holland 1993.
 
11
David W. Scott. "Multivariate Density Estimation" Wiley & Sons 1992.
12
 
13
Silverman, B.W. ,,Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis" Chapman & Hall 1986.
 
14
Simonoff, J. & Dong, J. "The Construction and Properties of Boundary Kernels for Sparse Multinomials" Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1994.
 
15
Wand, M.P. & Jones, M.C. ,,Kernel Smoothing" Chapman & Hall 1995.
 
16
Brodsky, B.E. & Darkhovsky, B.S. "Nonparametric Methods in change-point problems" Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993.
 
17
 
18
 
19

CITED BY  14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Björn Blohsfeld: colleagues
Dieter Korus: colleagues
Bernhard Seeger: colleagues