ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Measuring reuse of SAP requirements: a model-based approach
Full text PdfPdf (1.14 MB)
Source Symposium on Software Reusability archive
Proceedings of the 1999 symposium on Software reusability table of contents
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pages: 141 - 150  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISBN:1-58113-101-1
Author
Maya Daneva  Clearnet Communications Inc., 200 Consilium Place, Suite 1600, Toronto, Ontario M1H 3J3 Canada
Sponsor
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 112,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/303008.303069
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Basili,V., Rombach, H. The TAME Project: towards improvement-oriented software environments, P. Oman and Pfieeger, S.L. (eds.): Applying Soft-ware Metrics, Los Alamitos, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1997.
 
4
 
5
Brenner, W., and Keller, G. Business Reengineering mit Standard-Software. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, 1995.
 
6
Currant, T. and Keller, G. SAP R/3 Business Blueprint, Prentice-Hall, N J, 1998.
 
7
Daneva M. Deriving function points from SAP business processes and business objects, Journal of Information and Software Technologies, 1999. Accepted for publication.
 
8
Daneva, M. Function point counts derived from SAP business scenario requirements, Dumke, R., Abran, A. (eds.): Sol, are Measurement, Gabler, Wiesbaden, 1999, 265-269.
 
9
Daneva M., Heib, R. and Scheer, A.-W. Benchmarking Business Process Models, Technical Report - Veroeffentlichungen des Instituts fiJr Wirtschafisinformatik der Universit~it des Saarlandes, No. 136, Saarbr0cken, Germany, October 1996.
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
Hess, H. Wiederverwendbarkeit yon Software, Gabler, Wiesbaden, 1993.
 
15
IFPUG, Function Point Counting Manual, Release 4.0. Westerville, Ohio, 1994.
 
16
Jacquet, J.-P., and Abran, A. Metrics validation proposals: a structured analysis, Dumke, R., and Abran, A. (eds.): Software Measurement, Gabler, Wiesbaden, 1999, 43-60.
 
17
Jones, C. Applied Software Measurement, McGraw Hill, NY, 1996.
 
18
Jones, C. Estimating and Measuring SAP Applications with Function Point Metrics, Version 2, Software Productivity Research, Burligton MA, 1998.
 
19
 
20
Keller, G. and Detering, S. Process-oriented model}ing and analysis of business processes using the R/3 Reference Model, Bemus, P., and Nemes L. (eds.): Modelling and Methodologies for Enterprise Integration, Springer, London UK, 1996, 69-87.
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
Meli, R. Early and extended function point: a new method for function points estimation, in Proceedings of the IFPUG Fall Conference, IFUG, Ohio, 1997.
 
25
Melton, A. (ed.). Software Measurement, International Thompson Computer Press, London, UK, 1996.
 
26
Morris, P.M., and Desharnais, J.-M. Function point analysis. Validating the results, in Proceedings of the }iFPUG Sprint Conference, IFUG, Ohio, 1996.
 
27
 
28
 
29
SAP AG, R/3 System, Business Objects, Walldorf, 1997.
 
30
SAP AG, R/3 System Documentation, Walldori; 1996.
 
31