ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard
Full text PdfPdf (918 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 215 - 222  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISBN:0-201-48559-1
Authors
Sarah A. Douglas  Computer and Information Science Dept., University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
Arthur E. Kirkpatrick  Computer and Information Science Dept., University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
I. Scott MacKenzie  Dept. of Computing and Information Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 170,   Citation Count: 36
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/302979.303042
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The IS0 9241, Part 9 Draft International Standard for testing computer pointing devices proposes an evaluation of performance and comfort. In this paper we evaluate the scientific validity and practicality of these dimensions for two pointing devices for laptop computers, a finger-controlled isometric joystick and a touchpad. Using a between-subjects design, evaluation of performance using the measure of throughput was done for one-direction and multi-directional pointing and selecting. Results show a significant difference in throughput for the multi-directional task, with the joystick 27% higher; results for the one-direction task were non-significant. After the experiment, participants rated the device for comfort, including operation, fatigue, and usability. The questionnaire showed no overall difference in the responses, and a significant statistical difference in only the question concerning force required to operate the device - the joystick requiring slightly more force. The paper concludes with a discussion of problems in implementing the IS0 standard and recommendations for improvement.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
ISO. ISO/DIS 9241-9 Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals, Nonkeyboard Input Device Requirements, Draft International Standard, International Organization for Standardization, 1998.
 
4
MacKenzie, I. S. F itts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, (1992), pp. 91-139.
 
5
 
6
7

CITED BY  36

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sarah A. Douglas: colleagues
Arthur E. Kirkpatrick: colleagues
I. Scott MacKenzie: colleagues