The elements of computer credibility

ABSTRACT

Given the importance of credibility in computing products, the research on computer credibility is relatively small. To enhance knowledge about computers and credibility, we define key terms relating to computer credibility, synthesize the literature in this domain, and propose three new conceptual frameworks for better understanding the elements of computer credibility. To promote further research, we then offer two perspectives on what computer users evaluate when assessing credibility. We conclude by presenting a set of credibility-related terms that can serve in future research and evaluation endeavors.

REFERENCES

• 1: Andrews, L.W. & Gutkin, T.B. (1991). The Effects of Human Versus Computer Authorship on Consumers' Perceptions of Psychological Reports. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 31 I-317.
• 2: Jeff A. Bauhs , Nancy J. Cooke, Is knowing more really better?: effects of system development information in human-expert system interactions, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.99-100, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/259963.260072]
• 3: Buller, D.B. & Burgoon, J.K. (1996). Interpersonal Deception Theory. Communication Theory, 6(3) 203- 242.
• 4: Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic.
• 5: Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator Physical Attractiveness and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1387-1397.
• 6: Cialdini, R.B. (1993). Influence: Science and Practice. (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
• 7: Brian J. Fogg, Charismatic computers: creating more likable and persuasive interactive technologies by leveraging principles from social psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1998
• 8: BJ Fogg, Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.225-232, April 18-23, 1998, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/274644.274677]
• 9: Gatignon, H., & Robertson, T.S. (1991). Innovative Decision Processes. T.S. Robertson & H.H. Kassarjian (Eds.), Handbook of Consumer Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hail.
• 10: Hanowski, R.J., Kantowitz, S.C., & Kantowitz, B.H. (1994). Driver Acceptance of Unreliable Route Guidance Information. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 38th Annual Meeting, p. 1062-1066.
• 11: Harkins, S.G., & Petty, R.E. (1981). Effects of Source Magnification of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An information processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 401-413.
• 12: Honaker, L.M., Hector, V.S., & Harrell, T.H. (1986). Perceived Validity of Computer Versus Clinician- Generated MMPI Reports. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 77-83.
• 13: Kantowitz, B.H., Hanowski, R.J., & Kantowitz, S.C. (1997). Driver Acceptance of Unreliable Traffic Information in Familiar and Unfamiliar Settings. Human Factors, 39(2) 164-176.
• 14: Kenneth W Kerber, Attitudes towards specific uses of the computers quantitative, decision-making and record-keeping applications, Behaviour & Information Technology, v.2 n.2, p.197-209, April-June 1982 [doi>10.1080/01449298308914475]
• 15: Kim, J. & Moon, J.Y. (1997). Designing Towards Emotional Usability in Customer Interfaces: Trustworthiness of cyber-banking system interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 10, 1-29.
• 16: Larson, C. (1995). Persuasion: Reception and responsibility. (Tth ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• 17: Lee, J. (1991). The Dynamics of Trust in a Supervisory Control Simulation. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35'h Annual Meeting, p. 1228-1232.
• 18: Lee, J. & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, Control Strategies and Allocation of Function in Human-Machine Systems. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1243-1270.
• 19: F. Javier Lerch , Michael J. Prictula, How do we trust machine advice?, Proceedings of the third international conference on human-computer interaction on Designing and using human-computer interfaces and knowledge based systems (2nd ed.), p.410-419, September 1989, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 20: James C. Lester , Sharolyn A. Converse , Susan E. Kahler , S. Todd Barlow , Brian A. Stone , Ravinder S. Bhogal, The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.359-366, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258797]
• 21: Mackie, D.M., Worth, L.T., & Asuncion, A.G. (1990). Processing of Persuasive In-group Messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 812-822.
• 22: Matarazzo, J.D. (1986). Response to Fowler and Butcher on Matarazzo. American Psychologist, 41, 96.
• 23: Christopher A. Miller , Raymond Larson, An explanatory and “argumentative” interface for a model-based diagnostic system, Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.43-52, November 15-18, 1992, Monteray, California, United States [doi>10.1145/142621.142627]
• 24: Youngme Moon, The effects of distance in local versus remote human-computer interaction, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.103-108, April 18-23, 1998, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/274644.274660]
• 25: Muir, B.M. (1988). Trust Between Humans and Machines, and the Design of Decision Aids. Cognitive Engineering in Complex Dynamic Worlds. p. 71-83.
• 26: Muir, B.M. (1994). Trust in Automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37(11) 1905-1922.
• 27: Muir, B.M. & Moray, N. (1996). Trust in Automation: Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics, 39(3) 429-460.
• 28: Clifford Nass , B. J. Fogg , Youngme Moon, Can computers be teammates?, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.45 n.6, p.669-678, Dec. 1996 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1996.0073]
• 29: Nass, C., Reeves, B., & Leshner, G. (1996). Technology and Roles: A tale of two TVs. Journal of Communication, 46(2).
• 30: Clifford Nass , Youngme Moon , B. J. Fogg , Byron Reeves , D. Christopher Dryer, Can computer personalities be human personalities?, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.43 n.2, p.223-239, Aug. 1995 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1995.1042]
• 31: Pancer, S.M., George, M., & Gebotys, R.J. (1992). Understanding and Predicting Attitudes Toward Computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 211-222.
• 32: Petty, R. and Cacioppo, J. (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion." Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
• 33: Petty, R., Cacioppo, J., Goldman, R. (1981). Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5) 847-855.
• 34: Quintanar, L., Crowell, C., Pryor, J. (1982). Human- Computer Interaction: A preliminary social psychological analysis. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 14(2) 210-2213,.
• 35: Byron Reeves , Clifford Nass, The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1996
• 36: Rempel, J.K., Holmes, J.G, & Zanna, M.P. (1985). Trust in Close Relationships. journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 (1) 95-112.
• 37: Rotter, J.B. (1980). Interpersonal Trust, Trustworthiness, and Gullibility. American Psycliologist, 35 (1) 1-7.
• 38: Self, C.S. (1996). Credibility. In M. Salwen & D. Stacks (Eds.), An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
• 39: Sheridan, T.B., Vamos, T., and Aida S. (1983). Adapting Automation to Man, Culture ~md Society. Automatica, 19(6) 605-612.
• 40: Stiff, J. (1994). Persuasive Communication. New York: Guilford.
• 41: Waem, Y. & Ramberg, R. (1996). People's Perception of Human and Computer Advice. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(1) 17-27.
• 42: Yvonne Waern , Sture Hägglund , Jonas Löwgren , Ivan Rankin , Tomas Sokolnicki , Anne Steinemann, Communication knowledge for knowledge communication, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.37 n.2, p.215-239, Aug. 1992 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(92)90086-Z]
• 43: Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and Thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
• 44: Zimbardo, P. & Leippe, M. (1991). The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Theory

Keywords:
captology, credibility, expertise, influence, information quality, persuasion, psychology of HCI, trust, trustworthiness