ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
IS maintainability: should it reduce the maintenance effort?
Full text PdfPdf (1.08 MB)
Source Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference archive
Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Pages: 164 - 173  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISBN:1-58113-063-5
Author
E. Burton Swanson  The Anderson School at UCLA, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA
Sponsor
SIGCPR: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 8,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/299513.299658
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
 
4
Banker, R. D., and Kemerer, C. F., Performance Evaluation Metrics for Information Systems Development: A Principal-Agent Model, Information Systems Research, 3, 4 (1992), 379-400.
5
 
6
Chan, T., Three Essays on the Economics of Software Maintenance, unpublished doctoral dissertation, National University of Singapore, 1997.
 
7
 
8
 
9
Edwards, C., Information Systems Maintenance: An Integrated Perspective, MIS Quarterly, 8, 4 (1984), 237- 256.
 
10
 
11
Gallant, J., Survey Finds Maintenance Problem Still Escalating, Computerworld, 20, 4, January 1986, 31.
12
 
13
Gode, D. K., Bama, A., and Mukhopadhyay, T., On the Economics of the Software Replacement Problem, Proceedings of the I Jth International Conference on Information Systems, Copenhagen, 1990, 159-170.
 
14
Grady, R. B., Measuring and Managing Software Maintenance, IEEE Software, September 1987, 3545.
15
 
16
Hanna, M., Maintenance Burden Begging for Remedy, Software Magazine, April, 1993, 53 ft.
 
17
How Computers Can Choke Companies, The Economist, June 9, 1990, 65-66.
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
Kemerer, C. F., Software Complexity and Software Maintenance: A Survey of Empirical Research, Annals of Software Engineering, 1 (1995), 1-22.
 
22
Kemerer, C. F., and Ream, A. K., Empirical Research on Software Maintenance: 1981-1990, unpublished working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 1992.
 
23
 
24
Lientz, B. P., and Swanson, E. B., Impact of Development Productivity Aids on Application System Maintenance, Data Base, Winter-Spring 1980a, 114-120.
 
25
 
26
 
27
Martin, R. J., and Osborne, W. M., Guidance on Software Maintenance, NBS Special Publication 500-106, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1983.
 
28
 
29
Moad, J., Maintaining the Competitive Edge, Datamation, 36, February 15 (1990), 61-66.
 
30
 
31
 
32
Pierskalla, W. P., and Voelker, J. A., A Survey of Maintenance Models: The Control and Surveillance of Deteriorating Systems, Naval Research Logistics, 23, 3 (1976), 353-388.
33
 
34
 
35
Software Made Simple, Business Week, September 30, 1991, 92ff.
 
36
 
37
Swanson, E. B., Toward Information System Health, in Ruohonen, M. (Ed.), Visioiva Valmentaja Verkostoissa, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, 1997, 107-115.
 
38
 
39
Swanson, E. B., and Beath, C. M., Reconstructing the Systems Development Organization, MiS Quarterly, 13, 3 (1989b), 293-307.
40
41
 
42
Yau, S. S., and Collofello, J. S., Some Stability Measures for Software Maintenance, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-6, 6 (1980), 545-552.
 
43