ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The expressive powers of the logic programming semantics (extended abstract)
Full text PdfPdf (844 KB)
Source Symposium on Principles of Database Systems archive
Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems table of contents
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Pages: 196 - 204  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-89791-352-3
Author
John S. Schlipf  University of Cincinnati
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/298514.298564
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We compare the expressive powers of three semantics for deductive databases and logic programming: the 3-valued program completion semantics, the well-founded semantics, and the stable semantics, We identify the expressive power of the stable semantics, and in fairly general circumstances that of the well-founded semantics. Over infinite Herbrand models, where the three semantics have equivalent expressive power, we also consider a notion of uniform translatability between the 3-valued program completion and well-founded semantics. In this sense of uniform translatability we show the well-founded semantics to be more expressive.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
ABW88
 
Acz77
P. Aczel. An introduction to inductive definitions, In J. Barwise, editor, Handbook of Mathematical Logic, pages 739-782, North- Holland, New York, 1977.
AU79
 
Bar75
J. Barwise. Admissible Sets and Structures. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975.
Bry89
 
BS76
J. Barwise and J. Schlipf An introduction to recursively saturated and resplendent models. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 41(2): 531-536, 1976.
 
CH82
Ashok Chandra and David Harel. Structure and complexity of relational queries. JCSS, 25(1):99-128, 1982.
CH85
 
Cla78
K.L. Clark. Negation as failure. In Gallaire and Minker, editors, Logic and Databases, pages 293-322, Plenum Press, New York, 1978.
 
Fa74
R. Fagin Generalized first-order spectra and polynomial-time recognizable sets. In Karp, editor, Complexity of Computation, pages 43-74, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1974.
 
Fit85
M. Fitting. A Kripke-Kleene semantics for logic programs. Journal of Logic Programming, 2(4):295-312, 1985.
 
Gel87
M. Gelfond. On stratified autoepistemic theories. In Proc. AAAI, 1987.
 
GL88
M:. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz The stable model semantics for logic programming. In Proc. 5th In t'l Conf. Syrup. on Logic Programming, 1988.
 
GS86
Y. Gurevich and S. Shelah. Fixed-point extensions of first order logic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 32:265-280, 1986.
 
Imm86
 
Kun87
 
Kun88
K. Kunen. Some remarks on the completed database. Technical Report 775, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
 
Lif88
 
MT88
W. Marek and M. Truszczynski Autoepistemic Logic Technical Report, University of Kentucky.
 
Mos74
 
Prz88
Prz89
Ros89
 
Sch78
j. Schlipf Toward model theory through recursive saturation. J. Symbolic Logic 43, pages 183-206, 1978.
 
She85
Var82
VEK76
 
VG86
A. Van Gelder. Negation as failure using tight derivations for general logic programs. In Proc. Third IEEE Symposium on Logic Programming, Salt Lake City, Utah, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.
VG89
VGRS88

CITED BY  9