A comprehensive approach to flexibility in workflow management systems

ABSTRACT

Flexibility has recently grown to be one of the major research topics in the area of workflow management. In this paper we focus on flexibility of workflow management applications, in contrast to flexibility of the implementation of workflow management systems. In a case study we show the necessity of flexibility in workflow management applications. This flexibility can roughly be classified into flexibility, which is provided by the workflow type, and flexibility, which goes beyond the scope of the workflow type and has additionally to be provided by a workflow management system. We call this flexibility by selection and flexibility by adaption, respectively. We point out that the modeling process as a main aspect of flexibility by adaption has to be treated as a CSCW scenario. The classification leads to a structured overall concept for flexibility in workflow management applications.

REFERENCES

• 1: Clarence Ellis , Karim Keddara , Grzegorz Rozenberg, Dynamic change within workflow systems, Proceedings of conference on Organizational computing systems, p.10-21, August 13-16, 1995, Milpitas, California, United States [doi>10.1145/224019.224021]
• 2: Ellis, C.; El-khadiri, S.: Flex-Flow: A Language and System for Flexible Workflow. In: Technical Report, Colorado, 1997
• 3: Goesmann, T.; Just-Hahn, K.; Liiffeler, T.; Rolles, R.: Flexibilitat als Ziel beim Einsatz von Workflow-Management-Systemen. In: E. Ortner (Hrsg.): Proceedings EMISA Fachgruppetreffen 1997 (in German)
• 4: Hagemeyer, J.; Herrmann, T.; Just-Hahn, K.; Striemer, R: Flexibilitat bei Workflow-Management-Systemen. In: Liskowski, R.; Velichkovski, M.; Wiinschmann, W (Hrsg.): Usability Engineering: Integration von Mensch- Computer-Interaktion und Software-Entwicklung, Fachtagung Software-Ergonomie 1997, Dresden, 3.-6.3.97, Stuttgart: Teubner, 1997 (in German)
• 5: Heinl, P.: Exceptions during Workflow Execution. In: Proc. of the EDBT Workshop on Workflow Management Systems, (Valencia, Spain, March 23-27), 1998
• 6: Hypertext Webster Gateway: http://work.ucsd.edu:5141/ cgi-bin/http-Webster
• 7: Jablonski, S.: MOBILE: A Modular Workflow Model and Architecture, in: Proc. of the 4th biternational Working Conf on Dynamic Modeling and Information Systems, Noordwijkerhout, NL, Sept. 1994
• 8: Jablonski, S.; Bussler, C.: Workflow Management-Modeling, Concepts, Architecture and Implementation, International Thomson Computer Press, 1996
• 9: Stefan Jablonski , Katrin Stein , Michael Teschke, Experiences in Workflow Management for Scientific Computing, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, p.56, September 01-02, 1997
• 10: Karbe, B.; Ran-sperger, N.: Electronic Circulation Folders for the Design, Processing, and Migration of Office Processes. In: Online Conference, Hamburg, 1989
• 11: Bernhard H. Karbe , Norbert G. Ramsperger, Influence of exception handling on the support of cooperative office work, ACM SIGOIS Bulletin, v.11 n.4, p.2-15, Dec. 1990 [doi>10.1145/122220.122221]
• 12: Kreifelts, T.; Seuffert, P.; Woetzel, G.: Ausnahmebehandlung, Verteilung und Adressierung im Vorgangssystem DOMINO. In: Paul M. (Hrsg.): GI-17. Jahrestagung Computerintegrierter Arbeitsplatz im Biiro, Miinchen, 1987 (in German)
• 13: Mtlller, T.; Steinbauer, D.; Wedekind, H.: Control of Versions of Database Applications. In: IBM Germany GmbH, TR 83.09.003, Heidelberg, 1983
• 14: Netscape Communications Corporation: Process Manager Builder's Guide., Mountain View, 1998
• 15: Ortner, E.: Brauchen wir fur den Einsatz flexibler Workflow-Management-Systeme eine neue Gestaltungslehre der Arbeit? In: E. Ortner (Hrsg.): Proceedings EMISA Fuchgruppetre#en 1997 (in German)
• 16: Manfred Reichert , Peter Dadam, A Framework for Dynamic Changes in Workflow Management Systems, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, p.42, September 01-02, 1997
• 17: Reichert, M.; Dadam, I?: Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflows Without Loosing Control. In: Ulmer Informatik-Berichte, Technical Report No. 97-07, Ulm, 1997
• 18: Swenson, K.D.; Maxwell, R.J.; Matsumoto, T.; Saghari, B.; Irwin, K.: A Business Process Environment Supporting Collaborative Planning. In: The Journal Of Collaborative Computing, Vol. I, 1994
• 19: Siebert, R.: Anpassungsfahige Workflows zur Unterstiitzung unstrukturierter Vorgange. In: E. Ortner (Hrsg.): Proceedings EMISA Fachgruppetreffen 1997 (in German)
• 20: Siemens Nixdorf Informationssysteme AG: WorkParty Benutzerhandbuch Version 2.0, 1995 (in German)
• 21: Hartmut Wedekind, Are the terms “version” and “variant” orthogonal to one another?, ACM SIGMOD Record, v.23 n.4, p.3-7, Dec. 1994 [doi>10.1145/190627.190628]
• 22: Weske, M.: Uberlegungen zur Flexibilisierung von Workflow-Management-Systemen. In: E. Ortner (Hrsg.): Proceedings EMISA Fachgruppetreffen 1997 (in German)

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.5 PATTERN RECOGNITION
      I.5.2 Design Methodology
          Subjects: Classifier design and evaluation

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.1 Project and People Management
          Subjects: Systems analysis and design

General Terms:
Design, Management, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
flexibility, workflow management system