ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Estimation of lower bounds in scheduling algorithms for high-level synthesis
Full text PdfPdf (194 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES) archive
Volume 3 ,  Issue 2  (April 1998) table of contents
Pages: 162 - 180  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISSN:1084-4309
Authors
Giri Tiruvuri  Michigan State Univ., East Lansing
Moon Chung  Michigan State Univ., East Lansing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/290833.290839
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

To produce efficient design, a high-level synthesis system should be able to analyze a variety of cost-performance tradeoffs. The system can use lower-bound performance estimated methods to identify and puune inferior designs without producint complete designs. We present a lower-bound performance estimate method that is not only faster than existing methods, but also produces better lower bounds. In most cases, the lower bound produced by our algorithm is tight.Scheduling algorithms such as branch-and-bound need fast and effective lower-bound estimate methods, often for a large number of partially scheduled dataflow graphs, to reduce the search space. We extend our method to efficiently estimate completion time of partial schedules. This problem is not addressed by existing methods in the literature. Our lower-bound estimate is shown to by very effective in reducing the size of the search space when used in a branch-and-bound scheduling algorithm.Our methods can handle multicycle operations, pipelined functional units, and chaining of operations. We also present an extension to handle conditional branches. A salient feature of the extended method is its applicability to speculative execution as well as C-select implementation of conditional branches.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
CHUNG, M. J. AND TIRUVURI, G. 1995. Optimum dynamic programming scheduling under resource constraints. MSUCPS-TR95-44.
 
2
 
3
DAVIDSON, S., LANDSKOV, D., SHRIVER, B. D., AND MALLET, P.W. 1981. Some experiments in local microcode compaction for horizontal machines. IEEE Trans. Comput. C-30, 7 (July), 460-477.
4
 
5
FERNANDEZ, E. B. AND BUSSELL, B. 1973. Bounds on the number of processors and time for multiprocessor optimal schedules. IEEE Trans. Comput. C-22, 8 (Aug.), 745-751.
 
6
Hu, Y., GHOUSE, A., AND CARLSON, B. S. 1993. Lower bounds on the iteration time and the number of resources for functional pipelined data flow graphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Design. 21-24.
7
8
 
9
JAIN, R., PARKER, A. C., AND PARK, N. 1992. Predicting system-level area and delay for pipelined and non-pipelined designs. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. 12, 8 (Aug.).
 
10
KIM, T., LIU, J., AND LIU, C. 1991. A scheduling algorithm for conditional resource sharing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD '91, Santa Clara, CA, Nov. 11-14). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 84-87.
 
11
LANGERIN, M. AND CERNY, E. 1993. A recursive technique for computing lower-bound performance of schedules. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Design. 16-20.
 
12
 
13
 
14
OHM, S.Y. 1995. Personal Communication.
 
15
PANGRLE, B. M. AND GAJSKI, D. D. 1987. Slicer: A state synthesizer for intelligent silicon compiler. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Design. 42-45.
 
16
PAPACHRISTOU, C. A. AND KONUK, H. 1989. A high level synthesis technique based on linear programming. Tech. Rep. CES-89-21. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
 
17
 
18
PARK, N. AND PARKER, A. C. 1988. SEHWA: A software package for synthesis of pipelines from behavioral specifications. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits 7, 3 (Mar.), 356 -368.
 
19
PAULIN, P. G. AND KNIGHT, J. P. 1989. Force-directed scheduling for the beavioral synthesis of ASICs. IEEE Trans. CAD 8, 6 (June), 661-679.
 
20
RABAEY, J. M. AND POTKONJAK, M. 1994. Estimating implementation bounds for real time DSP application specific circuits. IEEE Trans. CAD 13, 6 (June), 669-683.
 
21
RADIVOJEVIC, I. P. AND BREWER, F. 1996. A new symbolic technique for control-dependent scheduling. IEEE Trans. CAD (Jan.).
 
22
RIM, M. AND JAIN, R. 1994. Lower-bound performance estimation for the high-level synthesis scheduling problem. IEEE Trans. CAD 13, 4 (Apr.), 451-458.
 
23
 
24
SHARMA, A. AND JAIN, R. 1993. Estimating architectural resources and performance for high-level synthesis applications. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. 1, 2 (June).
 
25
 
26
WAKABAYASHI, K. AND YOSHIMURA, T. 1989. A resource sharing and control synthesis method for conditional branches. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD). 62-65.
 
27


Collaborative Colleagues:
Giri Tiruvuri: colleagues
Moon Chung: colleagues