Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options

Full text

Pdf (3.09 MB)

Source

ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) archive
Volume 15 , Issue 4 (December 1983) table of contents

Pages: 319 - 349

Year of Publication: 1983

ISSN:0360-0300

Author

John Leslie King

Univ. of California, Irvine

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 53, Downloads (12 Months): 373, Citation Count: 31

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/289.290 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	ALLEN, B. R. 1982. Computer strategy: A philosophy for managing reformation processing resources. In The Econormcs of Information Processing, vol. 1, R. Goldberg and H. Lorin, Eds. Wiley, New York, pp. 7-18.
	2	ALLISON, G. T. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Little, Brown, Boston.
	3	ARNSTEIN, S. R. 1969. Eight rungs on the ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Planners 35, 4 (July), 216-232.
	4	ARROW, K. J. 1974. On the agenda of organization. In The Corporate Society, R. Marris, Ed. Macmillan, London.
	5	AXELROD, C. W. 1982. Dynamic planning and control of the net value of data processing. In The Economics of Information Processing, vol. 2, R. Goldberg and H. Lorin, Eds. Wiley, New York, 39-46.
	6	BENSON, D. H. 1983. A field study of end-user computing: Findings and issues. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 7, 4 (Dec.), 33-45.
	7	BERMAN, P. 1970a. A vote against centralized staff. Datarnation 16, 5 (May), 289-290.
	8	BERMAN, P. 1970b. Decentralized again. Datarnation 16, 13 (Oct.), 141-142.
	9	Dan Bernard, Management Issues in Cooperative Computing, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.11 n.1, p.3-17, March 1979 [doi>10.1145/356757.356759]
	10	BLAU, P. M. 1970. A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 35, 201-218.
	11	BOEHM, B. 1979. Software engineering: R & D trends and defense needs. In Research Directions m Software Technology, P. Wagner, Ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
	12	Barry W. Boehm, Software Engineering Economics, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1981
	13	BOE~M, B. W., ANO STANmSH, T. A. 1982. Software technology in the 1990s. Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine.
	14	BRANOON, D. H. 1970. Management Planning {or Data Processing. Brandon/Systems Press, Princeton, N. J.
	15	BRESLIN, J., AND TASHENBERG, C. B. 1978. D/stributed Processing Systems: End of the Mainframe Era? AMACOM, New York.
	16	Giacomo Bucci , Donald N. Streeter, A methodology for the design of distributed information systems, Communications of the ACM, v.22 n.4, p.233-245, April 1979 [doi>10.1145/359094.359099]
	17	BUCHANAN, J. R., ANO LINOWES, R. G. 1980a. Making distributed data processing work. liaryard Bus. Rev 58, 5 (Sept.~-Oct.), 143-161.
	18	BUCHANAN, J. R., ANO LINOWES, R. G. 1980b. Understanding distributed data processing. Harvard Bus. Rev. 58, 4 (July-Aug.), 143-154.
	19	BURLINGAME, J. F. 1961. Information technology and decentralization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 39, 6, 121-126.
	20	BURNS, T., AND STALKER, M. 1961. The Management of Innovatwn. Tavistock, London.
	21	Bvss, M. D. 1981. Penny-wise approach to data processing. Harvard Bus. Rev. 59, 4 (July-Aug.), 111-117.
	22	E. G. Cale , L. L. Gremillion , J. L. McKenney, Price/performance patterns of U. S. computer systems, Communications of the ACM, v.22 n.4, p.225-233, April 1979 [doi>10.1145/359094.359097]
	23	CHERVANY, N. C., DICKSON, G. W., AND NAUMANN, J. 1978. Distributed data processing for the State of Minnesota. College of Business Administration, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Nov.
	24	CmLo, J. 1973. Strategies of control and organizational behavior. Adrnin. ScL Q. 18, 1 (Mar.), 1- 17.
	25	Earl Chrysler, Some basic determinants of computer programming productivity, Communications of the ACM, v.21 n.6, p.472-483, June 1978 [doi>10.1145/359511.359523]
	26	CYERT, R. M., AND MARCH, J. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, New York.
	27	DANZlaER, J. N. 1979. The skill bureaucracy and intraorganizational control. Sociol Work Occup. 6, 204-226.
	28	DANZiGER, J. N., DUTTON, W. H., KLING, K., AND KRAEMER, K. L. 1982. Computers and Politics: High Technology and American Local Governments. Columbia University Press, New York.
	29	DEAROEN, J. 1965. How to organize information systems. Harvard Bus. Rev. 43, 2, 65-73.
	30	DEARDEN, J., MCFARLAN, F. W., AND ZANI, W. M. 1971. Managing Computer-Based In{ormatwn Systems. Irwin, Homewood, Ill.
	31	DEMB, A. B. 1975. Centralized vs. decentralized computer systems: A new approach to organizational impacts. CISR Report 12, Center for information Systems Research, Sloan School, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
	32	DEROzE, B. C., ANO NYMAN, T. H. 1978. The software life cycle: A management and technological challenge in the Department of Defense. IEEE Trans. So{tw. Eng. SE-4, 4 (July), 309-313.
	33	D'OLIVERIA, C. R. 1977. An analysis of computer decentralization. AD-A045 526, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va., Oct.
	34	DOLOTTA, T. A., BERNSTEIN, M. I., DICKSON, R. S., FRANCE, N. A., ROSENBLATT, B. A., SMITH, D. M., AND STEEL, T. B. 1976. Data Processing in 1980-1985. Wiley, New York.
	35	DOWNS, A. 1967. Insgte Bureaucracy. Little, Brown, Boston.
	36	EOELMAN, F. 1981. Managers, computer systems, and productivity. Manage. In{. Syst. Q. 3, 3 (Sept.), 1-20.
	37	EDP ANALYZER 1980a. Educating executives on new technology. EDP Anal. 18, 11 (Nov.).
	38	EDP ANALYZER 1980b. Risk assessment for distributed systems. EDP Anal. 18, 4 (Apr.).
	39	EDP ANALYZER 1980C. Tools for building distributed systems. EDP Anal. 18, 10 (Oct.).
	40	EDPIDR 1979. The trend to decentralization, Part 2. EDP In-Depth Rep. 8, 5, 1-13.
	41	EIN-DOR, P., AND SEGEV, E. 1978. Managing Management In{ormation Systems Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.
	42	FISHER, D. A. 1974. Automatic data processing costs in the defense department. Paper 1046, Institute for Defense Analysis, Oct.
	43	FOREST, R. B. 1977. Centralization vs. distributed processing vs. anarchy. DP Dig 23, 1 (Jan.), 1-2.
	44	FREEMAN, P. 1983. Reusable software engineering: Concepts and research directions. Dept. of information and Computer Science, Univ. of California, Irvine.
	45	GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE 1977. Problems found with Government Acquisition of and Use of Computers: 1965-December 1976. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C., FGMSD-77, Mar. 15.
	46	GIBSON, C., AND NOLAN, R. L. 1974. Managing the four stages of EDP growth. Harvard Bus Rev. 52, 1 (Jan.-Feb.), 76-84.
	47	GLASER, G. 1970. The centralization vs. decentralization issue: Arguments, alternatives and guidelines. Data Base 2, 3 (Mar.), 1-7.
	48	GOLUB, H. 1975. Organizing information system resources: Centralization vs. decentralization. In The In{ormatwn Systems Handbook. F. W. McFarlan and R. L. Nolan, Eds. Dow Jones- Irwin, Homewood, Ill.
	49	GROSCH, H. A. 1953. High speed arithmetic: The digital computer as a research tool. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 4 (Apr.), 11-16.
	50	GROSCH, H. A. 1975. Grosch's Law revisited. Computerworld 8, 16, 24.
	51	GROSCH, H. A. 1977. On costs. Comput. Eur. 5, 26 (June 30), 16.
	52	GROSCH, H. A. 1979. On Grosch's Law. Cornrnun. ACM 22, 6 (June), 376.
	53	HANNAN, J., ANO FRIED, L. 1977. Should you decentralize? Comput. Decis. 9, 2 (Feb.), 40-42.
	54	INFOTECH INTERNATIONAL 1977a. Distributed Processing 1: Analysis and bibliography. Infotech international, Maidenhead, England.
	55	INFOTECH INTERNATIONAL 1977b. Distributed Processing 2: Invited papers. Infotech International, Maidenhead, England.
	56	JENKINS, J. M., ANO SANTOS, R. S. 1982. Centralization vs. decentralization of data processing functions. In The Economics of Information Proc. esslng, vol. 2, R. Goldberg and H. Lorin, Eds. Wiley, New York, pp. 62-67.
	57	JOPLIN, B. 1967. Centralizing data processing facilities--A case study. Municip. Fmanc. 39, 4, 161- 166.
	58	KING, J. L. 1978. Centralization vs. Decentrahzation o{ Computing: An Empirical Assessment in City Governments. Public Policy Research Organization, University of California, Irvine.
	59	KING, J. L. 1980. Centralized and Decentralized Issues {or Computing Management Public Policy Research Organization, University of California, Irvine.
	60	KING, J. L. 1982a. Local government use of informarion technology: The next decade. Public Adm. Rev. 42, 1, 25-36.
	61	KING, J. L. 1982b. Organizational cost considerations in centralized vs. decentralized computing operations. In The Economics o{ Information Processing, vol. 2, R. Goldberg and H. Lorin, Eds. Wiley, New York, pp. 68-81.
	62	KING, J. L., AND KRAEMER, K. L. 1981. Cost of a social impact of information technologies. In Telecommunwatwns and Productivity, M. Moss, Ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
	63	KING, J. L., AND KRAEMER, K. L. 1984. The Dynamws o{ Cornputmg. Public Policy Research Organization, University of California, Irvine.
	64	John Leslie King , Edward L. Schrems, Cost-Benefit Analysis in Information Systems Development and Operation, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.10 n.1, p.19-34, March 1978 [doi>10.1145/356715.356718]
	65	Rob Kling, Automated welfare client-tracking and service integration: the political economy of computing, Communications of the ACM, v.21 n.6, p.484-493, June 1978 [doi>10.1145/359511.359528]
	66	Rob Kling, Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.12 n.1, p.61-110, March 1980 [doi>10.1145/356802.356806]
	67	KLING, R., AND SCACCnl, W. 1979. Recurrent dilemmas of computer use in complex organizations. In Proceedings o{ the AFIPS 1979 Conference, vol. 48. AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., pp. 107-115.
	68	K,.INO, R., AND SCACCHI, W. 1982. The web of computing: Computer technology at social organization. In Advances in Computers, vol. 21, M. Yovits, Ed. Academic Press, New York.
	69	KRAEMER, K. L. 1982. Telecommunications/transportation substitution and energy conservation, Part 1. Telecommun. Policy 6, 1, 39-59.
	70	KRAEMER, K. L., AND DUTTON, W. H. 1979. The interests served by technological reform: The case of computing. Adm $oc 11, 1, 80-106.
	71	KRAEMER, K. L., AND KING, J. L. 1976. Computers, power and urban management. Sage Publ., Beverly Hills, Calif.
	72	KRAEMER, K. L., AND KING, J. L. 1979. A requiem for USAC. Pohcy Anal 5, 3, 313-349.
	73	KRAEMER, K. L., AND KING, J. L. 1981. Computing policies and problems: A stage theory approach. Telecornrnun. Policy 5, 3, 198-215.
	74	KRAEMER, K. L., AND KING J. L. 1982. Telecommunications/transportation substitution and energy conservation, Part 2. Telecommun. Policy 6, 2, 87-99.
	75	KRAEMER, K. L., DVTTON, W. H., AND NORTHRUP, A. 1981. The Management of In{ormat~on Systerns. Columbia University Press, New York.
	76	LAWRENCE, R., AND LORSCH, J. W. 1969. Organization and Environment' Managing Differentiatwn and Integration. Irwin, Homewood, Ill.
	77	LEDBETTER L. E. 1980. The So{tware Life Cycle Model.' Implications {or Program Development Support Systems. Schlumberger-Doll Res., Ridgefield, Conn.
	78	LEINTZ, B. P., ANO SWANSON, E. B. 1974. Software maintenance: A user-management tug of war. Data Manage. 4, 26-30.
	79	B. P. Lientz , E. B. Swanson , G. E. Tompkins, Characteristics of application software maintenance, Communications of the ACM, v.21 n.6, p.466-471, June 1978 [doi>10.1145/359511.359522]
	80	LITTREL, R. F. 1974. Economies of scale in the IBM 360 and 370. Datarnat~on 20, 3 (Mar.), 33-36.
	81	Larry E. Long, Design and Strategy for Corporate Information Services: MIS Long Range Planning, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1981
	82	LUCAS, H. C. 1982. Alternative structures for the management of information processing. In The Economics of Information Processing, vol. 2, R. Goldberg and H. Lorin, Eds. Wiley, New York, pp. 55-61.
	83	Henry C. Lucas, Jr., Organizational power and the information services department, Communications of the ACM, v.27 n.1, p.58-65, Jan. 1984 [doi>10.1145/69605.357971]
	84	MARKUS, M. L. 1981. The politics of implementation: Top management support and user involvement. Syst. Objectives Solutions 1, 4, 203-216.
	85	MCFARL^N, F. W. 1972. Problems in planning the information system. Harvard Bus. Rev. 49, 2 (Mar.-Apr.), 75-89.
	86	MCKENNEY, J. E., AND MCFARL&N, F. W. 1982. The information archipelago: Maps and bridges. Harvard Bus. Rev. 60, 5 (Sept.-Oct.), 109-119.
	87	MERTES, L. H. 1981. Doing your office over electronically. Harvard Bus. Rev. 59, 2 (Mar.-Apr.), 127-135.
	88	MEYER, M. W. 1972. Size and structure of organizations: A causal analysis. Am. Sociol. Rev. 37, 4 (Aug.), 434-440.
	89	MOLOOW, B. D. 1982. The economic impact of networking. In The Economics of information Processing, vol. 1, R. Goldberg and H. Lorin, Eds. Wiley, New York, pp. 44-51.
	90	MOORE, W. E. 1962. The Conduct o{ the Corporation. Random House, New York.
	91	MOORE, W. E. 1967. Order and Change. Wiley, New York.
	92	J. H. Morrissey , L. S.-Y. Wu, Software engineering...an economic perspective, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Software engineering, p.412-422, September 17-19, 1979, Munich, Germany
	93	NmKANSEN, W. A. 1973. Bureaucracy: Servant or Mastery institute of Economic Affairs, London.
	94	Richard L. Nolan, Managing the computer resource: a stage hypothesis, Communications of the ACM, v.16 n.7, p.399-405, July 1973 [doi>10.1145/362280.362284]
	95	NOLAN, R. L. 1977. Management Accounting and Control of Data Processing. National Association of Accountants, New York.
	96	NOLAN, R. L. 1979. Managing the crises in data processing. Harvard Bus. Rev. 59, 2 (Mar.-Apr.), 115-126.
	97	NOLAN, R. L. 1982. Managing information systems by committee. Harvard Bus. Rev. 60, 4 (July- Aug.), 71-79.
	98	NOLAN, R. L., MCFARLAN, F. W., AND NORTON, D. 1973. In{ormation Systems Administration. Holt, New York.
	99	A. E. Oldehoeft , M. H. Halstead, Maximum computing power and cost factors in the centralization problem, Communications of the ACM, v.15 n.2, p.94-96, Feb. 1972 [doi>10.1145/361254.361261]
	100	Margrethe H. Olson, Remote office work: changing work patterns in space and time, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.3, p.182-187, March 1983 [doi>10.1145/358061.358068]
	101	ORLICKY, J. 1969. The Successful Computer System: Its Planning, Development, and Management in a Business Enterprise. McGraw-Hill, New York.
	102	PATRICK, R. L. 1976. Decentralizing hardware and dispersing responsibility. Datamatwn 5, 79-84.
	103	PAUL, L. 1982. Micro-CPU link eluding DPers. Computerworld (Nov. 8), 1.
	104	PERLMAN, J. A. 1965. Centralization vs. decentralization. Datamation 11, 9, 24-29.
	105	PERROW, C. 1979. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, 2nd ed. Scott-Foresman, Glenview, I11.
	106	PERROW, C. 1982. Not risk but power. A review of Schwing, R. C., and Albers, W. A., Jr. Societal R~sk Assessment. How Sale Is Enough? Conternp. Sociol. 11, 3, 298-299.
	107	PETTiGREW, A. M. 1972. Information control as a power resource. Sociology 6, 179-205.
	108	PFEFFER, J. 1982. Organizations and Organization Theory. Pittman, Marshfield, Mass.
	109	PmSTER, M., JR. 1975. Shared systems vs. stand alone systems. Harvard University Program on Information Technology and Public Policy working paper 75-1, Boston, Mass.
	110	Montgomery Phister, Jr., Data Processing Technology and Economics, Santa Monica Publishing Company, 1979
	111	PRICE, D. G. 1965. The development of computer centralization. In Economics o{ Automatic Data Processing. A. B. Frielink, Ed. Elsevier North- Holland, New York.
	112	PRICE, H. 1969. Centralized versus decentralized data processing in municipal government. Data Process. 14, 389-402.
	113	PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ORGANIZATION (PPRO) 1980. Orange County Facilities Management. Public Policy Research Organization, University of California, Irvine.
	114	REYNOLDS, C. H. 1977. Issues in centralization. Datamation 23, 3, 91-100.
	115	ROARK, A. 1971. Centralization vs. decentralization. In Proceedings of the 2nd Con{erence of the Society for Management Information Systems. Society for Management Information Systems, Chicago.
	116	ROBBINS, C. 1975. Distributed data processing. Data Manage. 13, 6, 71-75.
	117	Daniel Robey, Computer information systems and organization structure, Communications of the ACM, v.24 n.10, p.679-687, Oct. 1981 [doi>10.1145/358769.358786]
	118	ROCKART J. F., BULLEN, C. V., AND KOGAN, J. N. 1979. The management of distributed processing. CISR Report 39, Center for Informatwn Systerns Research, MIT Sloan School, Cambridge, Mass.
	119	ROMER, M. 1979. Comments on the costs of software maintenance made at the 1979 annual conference of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (San Diego Calif., Aug.).
	120	SALERNO, L. M. 1981. Catching up with the compurer revolution. Keeping informed. Harvard Bus. Rev. 59, 6 (Nov.-Dec.), 8-24.
	121	SCACCHI, W. S. 1981. The Process o{ Innovatwn in Computing. Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine.
	122	SCACCH!, W. S. 1984. Managing software projects: a social analysis. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-iO, 1 (Jan.), 49-59.
	123	SCOTT-MORTON, M. S. 1975. Organizing the informarion function for effectiveness as well as efficiency. CISR Report 39, Center for Information Systems Research, MIT Sloan School, Cambridge, Mass.
	124	L. Selwyn, ECONOMIES OF SCALE IN COMPUTER USE; INITIAL TEST AND IMPLICATION A FOR THE COMPUTER UTILITY, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1970
	125	William F. Sharpe, The Economics of Computers, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1972
	126	SIMON, H. A., KOMETSKY, G., GUETZKOW, H., ANO TYNDALL, G. 1954. Centrahzation vs. Decentralizatwn m Organizing the Controller's Department. The Controllership Foundation, New York.
	127	Martin B. Solomon, Jr., Economies of scale and the IBM system/360, Communications of the ACM, v.9 n.6, p.435-440, June 1966 [doi>10.1145/365696.365715]
	128	SOLOMON, M. B. 1970a. Economies of scale and computer personnel. Datamatwn 16, 3 (Mar.), 107-110.
	129	SOLOMON, M. B. 1970b. Economies of scale defended. Datamation 16, 6 (July), 293-294.
	130	Ralph H. Sprague, Jr. , Eric D. Carlson, Building Effective Decision Support Systems, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1982
	131	STATLAND, N. 1979. Computer systems: Centralized or dispersed? Adm. Manage. 39, 3, 57.
	132	STREETER D. N. 1973. Centralization or dispersion of computing facilities. IBM Syst. J 12, 3, 183- 301.
	133	TURKLE, S. 1979. Comments on the reasons behind user procurement of personal computer systems, made at the irvine Conference on Social Issues and Impacts of Computing (Lake Arrowhead, Calif., Aug.).
	134	UTTAL, B. 1982. What's detaining the office of the future. Fortune (May 3), 176-196.
	135	VITALARI, N. P., AND VENKATESH, A. 1984. Shi{ts m the allocation of time: The case o{ computing in the home. Public Policy Research Organization, University of California, irvine.
	136	WAGNER, F. V. 1976. Is decentralization inevitable? Datamat~on 22, 11, 86-97.
	137	WAGNER, L. G. 1966. Computers, decentralizations, and corporate control. Call{ Manage. Rev. 9, 2, 25-32.
	138	WEBER, M. 1947. The Theory o{ Social and Economic Organization Oxford University Press, New York.
	139	WEBER, M. 1952. The essentials of bureaucratic organization: An ideal-type construction, in Reader in Bureaucracy, R. Merton, Ed. Free Press, Glencoe Ill.
	140	WEISS, E. A. 1975. Centralization or decentralization: Which is best? Computerworld (Sept. 24), 29.
	141	WILDAVSKY, A. B. 1976. The Politzcs o{ the Budgetary Process Little, Brown, Boston.
	142	WITHINGTON, F. G. 1969. Data processing's envolving place in the organization. Datamation 15, 6 (June), 58-68.
	143	WITHINGTON, F. G. 1973. Crystal bailing: Trends in EDP management. Infosysterns 20, 1, 20-21.
	144	WITHINGTON, F. G. 1980. Coping with computer proliferation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 58, 3 (May- June), 152-164.
	145	YIN, R. 1979. Production efficiency vs. bureaucratic self-interest: Two innovative processes? Policy Sc~ 8, 381-399.
	146	ZANNETOS, Z. 1965. On the theory of divisional structures: Some aspects of centralization and decentralization of control and decisionmaking. Management Sc~. 12, 4, B49--B67.
	147	Marvin V. Zelkowitz, Perspectives in Software Engineering, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.10 n.2, p.197-216, June 1978 [doi>10.1145/356725.356731]

CITED BY 31

	Carol V. Brown , Sharon L. Magill, Designing the IS organization: aligning the systems development function with the business, Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, p.97-108, April 05-07, 1992, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
	Akhilesh Bajaj, A study of senior information systems managers decision models in adopting new computing architectures, Journal of the AIS, v.1 n.1es, March 2000
	William W. Cotterman , Kuldeep Kumar, User cube: a taxonomy of end users, Communications of the ACM, v.32 n.11, p.1313-1320, Nov. 1989
	Alice Andrews , Fred Niederman, A firm-level model of IT personnel planning, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, p.274-285, March 26-28, 1998, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
	Young Moo Kang , Robert B. Miller , Roger Alan Pick, Comments on "Grosch's law re-revisited: CPU power and the cost of computation", Communications of the ACM, v.29 n.8, p.779-781, Aug. 1986
	Alan R. Hevner , O. Q. Wu , S. B. Yao, Query optimization on local area networks, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.3 n.1, p.35-62, Jan. 1985
	Haim Mendelson, Economies of scale in computing: Grosch's law revisited, Communications of the ACM, v.30 n.12, p.1066-1072, Dec. 1987
	Malini Sridhar , G. Lawrence Sanders, A contingency model for mapping chargeback systems to information system environments, Proceedings of the 1993 conference on Computer personnel research, p.206-213, April 01-03, 1993, St Louis, Missouri, United States
	Kalle Lyytinen, Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.19 n.1, p.5-46, March 1987
	Batya Friedman , Peter H. Kahn, Jr., Human values, ethics, and design, The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 2002
	Brian D. Lynch , H. Raghav Rao , Winston T. Lin, Economic analysis of microcomputer hardware, Communications of the ACM, v.33 n.10, p.119-129, Oct. 1990
	Y. M. Kang, Computer hardware performance: production and cost function analyses, Communications of the ACM, v.32 n.5, p.586-593, May 1989
	Fred Niederman, Information systems personnel as expatriates: a review of the literature and identification of issues, Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, p.232-240, April 05-07, 1992, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
	M. Lynne Markus , Niels Bjørn-Andersen, Power over users: its exercise by system professionals, Communications of the ACM, v.30 n.6, p.498-504, June 1987
	Nicholas V. Findler, Innovative features in a distributed decision support system based on intelligent agent technology, Decision making support systems: achievements, trends and challenges for, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2002
	James C. Brancheau , Carol V. Brown, The management of end-user computing: status and directions, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.25 n.4, p.437-482, Dec. 1993
	Kathleen Knoll , Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, Information technology alignment or “fit” in highly turbulent environments: the concept of flexibility, Proceedings of the 1994 computer personnel research conference on Reinventing IS : managing information technology in changing organizations: managing information technology in changing organizations, p.1-14, March 24-26, 1994, Alexandria, Virginia, United States
	Hugh J. Watson , Celia Fuller , Thilini Ariyachandra, Data warehouse governance: best practices at blue cross and blue shield of North Carolina, Decision Support Systems, v.38 n.3, p.435-450, December 2004
	Janet D. Hartman, Management of decentralized computing facilities, Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services, p.73-77, November 11-14, 1984, Reno, Nevada, United States
	Catherine Chu , Steve Smithson, Organizational structure and e-business: a structurational analysis, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Electronic commerce, p.205-212, September 30-October 03, 2003, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
	J. Roberto Evaristo , Kevin C. Desouza , Kevin Hollister, Centralization momentum: the pendulum swings back again, Communications of the ACM, v.48 n.2, p.66-71, February 2005
	Andreas L. Opdahl, Model-supported alignment of information systems architecture, Business strategies for information technology management, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2003
	Bruce Rocheleau, Politics, accountability, and governmental information systems, Public information technology: policy and management issues, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2003
	Marijn Janssen, Centralized or decentralized organization?, Proceedings of the 2005 national conference on Digital government research, May 15-18, 2005, Atlanta, Georgia
	Marijn Janssen, Managing the development of shared service centers: stakeholder considerations, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Electronic commerce, August 15-17, 2005, Xi'an, China
	Rob Kling, What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter?, The Information Society, v.23 n.4, p.205-220, July 2007
	Thomas Gerace , Raymond Jean , Adam Krob, Decentralized and centralized it support at Tulane University: a case study from a hybrid model, Proceedings of the 35th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services, p.125-128, October 07-10, 2007, Orlando, Florida, USA
	Alon Peled, First-class technology - third-rate bureaucracy: the case of Israel, Information Technology for Development, v.9 n.1, p.45-58, January 2000
	Rohit Khare , Richard N. Taylor, Extending the Representational State Transfer (REST) Architectural Style for Decentralized Systems, Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, p.428-437, May 23-28, 2004
	John Leslie King , Suzanne Iacono , Jonathan Grudin, Going Critical: Perspective and Proportion in the Epistemology of Rob Kling, The Information Society, v.23 n.4, p.251-262, July 2007
	Kiam Tian Seow , Kwang Mong Sim, Decentralized Assignment Reasoning Using Collaborative Local Mediation, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, v.18 n.11, p.1576-1580, November 2006