ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Data networks as cascades: investigating the multifractal nature of Internet WAN traffic
Full text PdfPdf (2.19 MB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM '98 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Pages: 42 - 55  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:1-58113-003-1
Also published in ...
Authors
A. Feldmann  AT&T Labs - Research, Florham Park, NJ
A. C. Gilbert  AT&T Labs - Research, Florham Park, NJ
W. Willinger  AT&T Labs - Research, Florham Park, NJ
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 53,   Citation Count: 52
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/285237.285256
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In apparent contrast to the well-documented self-similar (i.e., monofractal) scaling behavior of measured LAN traffic, recent studies have suggested that measured TCP/IP and ATM WAN traffic exhibits more complex scaling behavior, consistent with multifractals. To bring multifractals into the realm of networking, this paper provides a simple construction based on cascades (also known as multiplicative processes) that is motivated by the protocol hierarchy of IP data networks. The cascade framework allows for a plausible physical explanation of the observed multifractal scaling behavior of data traffic and suggests that the underlying multiplicative structure is a traffic invariant for WAN traffic that co-exists with self-similarity. In particular, cascades allow us to refine the previously observed self-similar nature of data traffic to account for local irregularities in WAN traffic that are typically associated with networking mechanisms operating on small time scales, such as TCP flow control.To validate our approach, we show that recent measurements of Internet WAN traffic from both an ISP and a corporate environment are consistent with the proposed cascade paradigm and hence with multifractality. We rely on wavelet-based time-scale analysis techniques to visualize and to infer the scaling behavior of the traces, both globally and locally. We also discuss and illustrate with some examples how this cascade-based approach to describing data network traffic suggests novel ways for dealing with networking problems and helps in building intuition and physical understanding about the possible implications of multifractality on issues related to network performance analysis.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Abry and D. Veitch. Wavelet analysis of long-range dependent traffic. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 44, pp. 2-15, 1998.
 
2
 
3
 
4
K. C. Claffy, H.-W. Braun, and G. C. Polyzos. A parameterizable methodology for internet traffic flow profiling IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 13, pp. 1481-1494, 1995.
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
C. J. G. Evertsz and B. B. Mandelbrot. Multifractal measures. In H.-O. Peitgen, H. Jurgens and D. Saupe, editors, Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers in Science, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1092.
9
 
10
A. Feldmann, J. Rexford and R. Caceres. Reducing Overhead in Flow-Switched Networks: An Empirical Study of Web Traffic. Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM'98, 1998 (to appear).
 
11
A. C. Gilbert, W. Willinger and A. Feldmann. Scaling analysis of random cascades in network traffic. Preprint. 1998
12
 
13
V. K. Gupta and E. C. Waymire. A statistical analysis of mesoscale rainfall as a random cascade. Journal of Applied Meteorology 32, pp. 251-267, 1993.
 
14
R. Holley and E. C. Waymire. Multifractal dimensions and scaling exponents for strongly bounded random cascades. Annals of Applied Probability 2, pp. 819-845, 1992.
 
15
 
16
T. G. Kurtz. Limit theorems for workload input models. In F. P. Kelly, S. Zachary, and I. Ziedins, editors, Stochastic Networks: Theory and Applications. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996.
 
17
 
18
J. Levy-Vehel and R. Riedi. Fractional Brownian motion and data traffic modeling: The other end of the spectrum. In FractaIs in Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 185- 202, 1997.
 
19
P. Mannersalo and I. Norros. Multifractal analysis of real ATM traffic: A first look. COST257TD, VTT Information Technology, 1997.
 
20
S. McCanne and S. Floyd. NS: Network Simulator. http://www-mash, cs. berkeley, edu/ns/.
 
21
Y. Meyer and R. Coifman. Wavelets: Calderdn-Zygmund and muItitinear operators, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 52-54, 1997.
 
22
E. W. Montroll and M. F. Shlesinger. On 1/f noise and other distributions with long tails. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, pp. 3380-3383, 1982.
23
24
 
25
 
26
R. H. Riedi and J. Levy-Vehel. TCP traffic is multifractal: A numerical study. Preprint, 1997.
27
 
28
M. S. Taqqu, V. Teverovsky and W. Willinger. Is network traffic self-similar or multifractal? Fractats 5, pp. 63-73, 1997.
 
29
A. H. Tewfik and M. Kim. Correlation structure of the discrete wavelet coefficients of fractional Brownian motion. IEEE Trans. or~ In}o. Theory, vo}. 38, 2, pp. 904-909, 1992.
 
30
 
31

CITED BY  52

Collaborative Colleagues:
A. Feldmann: colleagues
A. C. Gilbert: colleagues
W. Willinger: colleagues