ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation
Full text PdfPdf (789 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 45 ,  Issue 4  (July 1998) table of contents
Pages: 653 - 750  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
Oded Goldreich  Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Shari Goldwasser  Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel; and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Dana Ron  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 84,   Citation Count: 94
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/285055.285060
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we consider the question of determining whether a function f has property P or is &egr;-far from any function with property P. A property testing algorithm is given a sample of the value of f on instances drawn according to some distribution. In some cases, it is also allowed to query f on instances of its choice. We study this question for different properties and establish some connections to problems in learning theory and approximation.In particular, we focus our attention on testing graph properties. Given access to a graph G in the form of being able to query whether an edge exists or not between a pair of vertices, we devise algorithms to test whether the underlying graph has properties such as being bipartite, k-Colorable, or having a p-Clique (clique of density p with respect to the vertex set). Our graph property testing algorithms are probabilistic and make assertions that are correct with high probability, while making a number of queries that is independent of the size of the graph. Moreover, the property testing algorithms can be used to efficiently (i.e., in time linear in the number of vertices) construct partitions of the graph that correspond to the property being tested, if it holds for the input graph.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
ALON, N., GOLDREICH, O., H#STAD, J., AND PERALTA, R. 1992. Simple constructions of almost k-wise independent random variables. J. Rand. Struct. Algorithms 33, 289-304.
 
3
ANGLUIN, D. 1978. On the complexity of minimum inference of regular sets. Inf. Cont. 39, 337-350.
 
4
5
 
6
ARORA, S., LUND, C., MOTWANI, R., SUDAN, M., AND SZEGEDY, M. 1992. Proof verification and intractability of approximation problems. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, New York, pp. 14-23.
 
7
ARORA, S., AND SAFRA, S. 1992. Probabilistic checkable proofs: A new characterization of NP. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, New York, pp. 1-13.
8
 
9
BABAI, L., FORTNOW, L., AND LUND, C. 1991b. Non-deterministic exponential time has two-prover interactive protocols. Computat. Complex. 1, 1, 3-40.
 
10
 
11
12
13
14
 
15
 
16
17
18
 
19
CHERNOFF, H. 1952. A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Ann. Math. Stat. 23, 493-507.
 
20
COVER, T.M. 1973. On determining the rationality of the mean of a random variable.Ann. Stat. 1, 862-871.
 
21
 
22
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
GOLD, M. E. 1978. Complexity of automation identification from given data. Inf. Cont. 37, 302-320.
 
28
GOLDREICH, O. 1995. Foundations of Crytography--Fragments of a Book. Available from ECCC, http ://www. eccc.uni-trier, de/eccc/.
29
30
 
31
GROTSCHEL, M., LOVASZ, L., AND SCHRIJVER, A. 1988. Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization. Springer-Verlag, New York.
 
32
HAJNAL, P. 1991. An #(n4/3) lower bound on the randomized complexity of graph properties. Combinatorica 11, 2, 131-144.
33
 
34
35
36
 
37
 
38
HOEFFDING, W., AND WOLFOWITZ, J. 1958. Distinguishability of sets of distributions. Ann. Math. Stat. 29, 700-718.
 
39
KARGER, D. R., MOTWANI, R., AND SUDAN, M. 1994. Approximate graph coloring by semidefinite programming. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundation of Computer Science. ACM, New York, pp. 2-13.
40
41
42
 
43
KING, V. 1991. An O(n5/4) lower bound on the randomized complexity of graph properties. Combinatorica 11, 1, 23-32.
 
44
45
 
46
LOVASZ, L., AND YOUNG, N. 1991. Lecture notes on evasiveness of graph properties. Tech. Rep. TR-317-91. Computer Science Department, Princeton Univ., Princeton, N.J.
 
47
 
48
49
50
51
 
52
RUBINFELD, R. 1994. Robust functional equations and their applications to program testing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, New York, pp. 288-299.
 
53
54
 
55
SZEMEP, EDI, E. 1978. Regular partitions of graphs. In Proceedings of the Colloquim International CNRS. pp. 399-401.
56
57
 
58
VAPNIK, g. N., AND CHERVOENKIS, A.Y. 1971. On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. Theory Prob. Applic. 17, 2, 264-280.
 
59
 
60
YAO, A. C.C. 1987. Lower bounds to randomized algorithms for graph properties. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, New York, pp. 393-400.
 
61
ZEITOUNI, 0., AND KULKARM, S.R. 1995. A general classification rule for probability measures. Ann. Stat. 23, 1393-1407.

CITED BY  95

Collaborative Colleagues:
Oded Goldreich: colleagues
Shari Goldwasser: colleagues
Dana Ron: colleagues