ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Fast high-level power estimation for control-flow intensive design
Full text PdfPdf (901 KB)
Source International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design archive
Proceedings of the 1998 international symposium on Low power electronics and design table of contents
Monterey, California, United States
Pages: 299 - 304  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:1-58113-059-7
Authors
Kamal S. Khouri  Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Ganesh Lakshminarayana  Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Niraj K. Jha  Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Sponsors
IEEE-SSCS : Solid Stat Circuits Council
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
IEEE-EDS : Electronic Devices Society
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/280756.280941
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a power estimation technique for control-flow intensive designs that is tailored towards driving iterative high-level synthesis systems, where hundreds of architectural trade-offs are explored and compared. Our method is fast and relatively accurate. The algorithm utilizes the behavioral information to extract branch probabilities, and uses these in conjunction with switching activity and circuit capacitance information, to estimate the power consumption of a given architecture. We test our algorithm using a series of experiments, each geared towards measuring a different indicator. The first set of experiments measures the algorithm's accuracy when compared to the actual circuit power. The second set of experiments measures the average tracking index, and tracking index fidelity for a series of architectures. This index measures how well the algorithm makes decisions when comparing the relative power consumption of two architectures contending as low-power candidates. Results indicate that our algorithm achieved an average estimation error of 11.8% and an average tracking index of 0.95 over all examples.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. C. Deng, "Power analysis for CMOS/BiCMOS circuits," in Proc. Int. Wkshp. Low Power Design, pp. 3-8, Apr. 1994.
 
2
3
 
4
J. Rabaey and M. Pedram (Editors), Low Power Design Methodologies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1996.
5
 
6
S.R. Powell and P. M. Chau, "Estimating power dissapation of VLSI signal processing chips: The PFA technique," in Proc. VLSI Signal Processing IV, pp. 250-259, 1990.
 
7
 
8
9
10
 
11
L. Benini, A. Bogliolo, M. Favalli, and G. De Micheli, "Regression models for behavioral power estimation," in Proc. Power & Timing Modeling Optimization & Simulation Wkshp., pp. 179-188, 1996.
 
12
 
13
A. P. Chandrakasan, S. Sheng, and R. W. Broderson, "Low-power CMOS digital design," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, pp. 473-484, Apr. 1992.
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
A. P. Chandrakasan, M. Potkonjak, R. Mehra, J. Rabaey, and R. W. Broderson, "Optimizing power using transformations," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 14, pp. 12-51, Jan. 1995.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kamal S. Khouri: colleagues
Ganesh Lakshminarayana: colleagues
Niraj K. Jha: colleagues