ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On sequential prediction of individual sequences relative to a set of experts
Full text PdfPdf (1.09 MB)
Source Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory archive
Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on Computational learning theory table of contents
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Pages: 1 - 11  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:1-58113-057-0
Authors
Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi  Department of Information Sciences, University of Milan, Via Comelico 39, 20135 Milano, Italy
Gábor Lugosi  Department of Economics, Pompeu Fabra University, Ramon Trias Fargas 25-27, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
Sponsors
University of Wisconsin : University of Wisconsin
UC @ Santa Cruz : UC @ Santa Cruz
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/279943.279946
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Azuma. Weighted sums of certain dependent random variables. Tohoku Mathematical Journal, 68:357- 367, 1967.
2
3
 
4
Y.S. Chow and H. Teicher. Probability Theory, Independence, Interchangeability, Martingales. Springer- Verlag, New York, 1978.
 
5
 
6
T.M. Cover. Behavior of sequential predictors of binary sequences. In Proceedings of the 4th Prague Conference on Information Theory, Statistical Decision Functions, Random Processes, pages 263-272. Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, 1965.
 
7
L. Devroye, L. Gy6rfi, and G. Lugosi. A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.
 
8
M. Feder, N. Merhav, and M. Gutman. Universal prediction of individual sequences. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38:1258-1270, 1992.
 
9
E.N. Gilbert. A comparison of signalling alphabets. Bell System Technical Journal, 31:504-522, 1952.
 
10
W. Hoeffding. Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58:13-30, 1963.
 
11
M. Ledoux and M. Talagrand. Probability in Banach Space. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
 
12
 
13
C. McDiarmid. On the method of bounded differences. In Surveys in Combinatorics 1989, pages 148- 188. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.
 
14
M. Opper and D. Haussler. Worst case prediction over sequences under log loss. In The Mathematics oflnformation Coding, Extraction and Distribution, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1998.
 
15
D. Pollard. Asymptotics via empirical processes. Statistical Science, 4:341-366, 1989.
 
16
S.J. Szarek. On the best constants in the Khintchine inequality. Studia Mathematica, 63:197-208, 1976.
 
17
M. Talagrand. Majorizing measures: the generic chaining. Annals of Probability, 24:1049-1103, 1996. (Special Invited Paper).
 
18


Collaborative Colleagues:
Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi: colleagues
Gábor Lugosi: colleagues