ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Effects of architectural and technological advances on the HP/Convex Exemplar's memory and communication performance
Full text PdfPdf (1.42 MB)
Source International Symposium on Computer Architecture archive
Proceedings of the 25th annual international symposium on Computer architecture table of contents
Barcelona, Spain
Pages: 318 - 329  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:0-8186-8491-7
Also published in ...
Authors
Gheith A. Abandah  Advanced Computer Architecture Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Edward S. Davidson  Advanced Computer Architecture Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Sponsors
IEEE-CS\TCCA : TC on Computer Arhitecture
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 15,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/279358.279401
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Advances in microarchitecture, packaging, and manufacturing processes enable designers to build new systems with higher performance and scalability. Using microbenchmark techniques, we contrast the memory and communication performance of two generations of the HP/Convex Exemplar scalable parallel processing system. The SPP1000 and SPP2000 have significant architectural and implementation differences, but maintain upward binary compatibility. The SPP2000 employs manufacturing and packaging advances to obtain shorter system interconnects with wider data paths and improved functionality, thereby reducing the latency and increasing the bandwidth of remote communication. Although the memory latency is not significantly improved, newer out-of-order execution processors coupled with nonblocking caches achieve much higher memory bandwidth. The SPP2000 has a richer system interconnect topology that allows scalability to a larger number of processors. The SPP2000 also employs innovations in its coherence protocols to improve synchronization and communication performance. This paper characterizes the performance effects of these changes, and identifies some remaining inefficiencies, in the cache coherence protocol and the node configuration, that future systems should address.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
G. Abandah and E. Davidson. A Comparative Study of Cache-Coherent Nonunitbrm Memory Access Systems. In High Performance Computing Systems and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, May 1998. 12th Ann. lnt'l Symp. High Performance Computing Systems and Applications (HPCS'98).
 
2
 
3
 
4
G. Astfalk and T. Brewer. An Overview of the HP/Convex Exemplar Hardware. Tech. paper, Hewlett-Packard Co., June 1997. http://www.hp.com/wsg/tech/technical.html.
 
5
G. Astfalk, T. Brewer, and G. Palmer. Cache Coherence in the Convex MPP. Tech. paper, Hewlett-Packard Co., Feb. 1994. http://www.hp.com/wsg/tech/technical.html.
 
6
 
7
 
8
W. Bryg, K. Chan, and N. Fiduccia. A High- Performance, Low-Cost Multiprocessor Bus for Workstations and Midrange Servers. HewIett-Packard J., 47(1 ):18- 24, Feb. 1996.
 
9
 
10
 
11
12
 
13
 
14
IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Standard for Scalable Coherent Interface (SCI), Aug. 1993. IEEE Std 1596-1992.
15
16
 
17
 
18
L. McVoy and C. Staelin. lmbench: Portable Tools for Per.. formance Analysis. In Proc. USENIX'96 Ann. Technical Conf., pages 279-294, Jan. 1996.
19
 
20
K. Shaw and G. Astfalk. Four-State Cache- Coherence in the Convex Exemplar System. Internal memo, Convex Computer Corp., Oct. 1995. http://www'hp'c~m/wsg/tech/technical'html"
 
21
SPEC CPU95 Benchmarks Results. See the Standard Performance Evaluation Corp., web page http://www.spec.org/.
 
22


Collaborative Colleagues:
Gheith A. Abandah: colleagues
Edward S. Davidson: colleagues