Dynamic programming alignment accuracy

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Dynamic programming alignment accuracy

Full text

Pdf (763 KB)

Source

Annual Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology archive
Proceedings of the second annual international conference on Computational molecular biology table of contents

New York, New York, United States

Pages: 102 - 108

Year of Publication: 1998

ISBN:0-89791-976-9

Authors

Ian Holmes	Sanger Centre, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, England
Richard Durbin	Sanger Centre, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, England

Sponsor

SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 37, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/279069.279102 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Needleman S.B. and Wunsch C.D. 1970. A general method applicable to the search for similarity in the amino acid sequences of two proteins. Y. Mol. Biol. 48, 443-453.
	2	Pearson W.R. and Lipman D.3. 1988. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 2444-2448.
	3	Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W. and Lipman D.J. 1990. A basic local alignment search tool. Y. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410.
	4	Thorne J.L., Kishlno H., Felsenstein J. 1992. Inching toward reality: an improved likelihood model of sequence evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 34, 3-16.
	5	McChre M.A., Vast T.K. and Fitch W.M. 1994. Comparative analysis of multiple protein sequence alignment methods. J. Mol. Evol. 11, 571-592.
	6	Gotoh O. 1996. Significant improvement in accuracy of multiple protein alignments by iterative refinement as assessed by reference to structural alignments. Y. Mol. Biol. 264, 823-838.
	7	Mevissen H.Th. and Vingron M. 1996. Quantifying the local reliability of a sequence alignment. Protein Engin~ring 9:2, 127-132.
	8	Hwa T. and LLssig M. 1996. Simila~ty-detection and localization. Phys. Rev. Left. 76, 2591.
	9	Smith T.F. and Waterman M.S. 1981. The identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147, 195-197.
	10	Vingron M. and Waterman M.S. 1994. Sequence alignment and penalty choice: review of concepts, case studies and implications. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 1-12.
	11	Jukes T.H. and Cantor C.R. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Mammalian Protein Metabolism Academic Press, New York 21-132.
	12	Miyazawa S. 1994. A reliable sequence alignment method based on probabilities of residue correspondences. Protein Engineering 8:10, 999-1009.