ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Requisite IS management knowledge and skills construct: a survey
Full text PdfPdf (1.25 MB)
Source ACM SIGCPR Computer Personnel archive
Volume 19 ,  Issue 1  (January 1998) table of contents
Pages: 3 - 19  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISSN:0160-2497
Authors
Nansi Shi  University of South Australia
David Bennett  Professor of Technology Management, Aston Business School, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 11,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/277345.277346
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A review of the literature suggests that various IS knowledge and skills should be grouped into a construct because many IS tasks require a combination of diverse disciplines. Many studies argue that today's IS executives should be multidisciplinary, while the organizational skills are becoming increasingly important. However, the outstanding issue is what is the appropriate balance of disciplines between the organizational domain and technical domain. For understanding such a balance, it is easier to refer to quantitative proportions than to qualitative descriptions. Therefore, this study suggests a way to quantitatively identify an IS management knowledge and skills construct - a combination that comprises six related knowledge and skills categories suggested by the literature. By analyzing the data obtained in a 1996's survey, two such constructs for current proficiency and expected level have been quantitatively identified. To people aiming at a senior IS executive career, the deficiencies between current and expected constructs suggest not only the direction but also the extent should be enhanced, and the constructs indicate the balance among various disciplines should be maintained.



Collaborative Colleagues:
Nansi Shi: colleagues
David Bennett: colleagues