ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A general framework for assembly planning: the motion space approach
Full text PdfPdf (1.52 MB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the fourteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Pages: 9 - 18  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:0-89791-973-4
Authors
Dan Halperin  Department of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Jean-Claude Latombe  Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Randall H. Wilson  Eastman Kodak Company, Albuquerque, NM
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/276884.276886
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
D. F. Baldwin, T. E. Abell, M.-C. M. Lui, T. L. De Fazio, and D. E. Whitney. An integrated computer aid for generating and evaluating assembly 8equence# for mechanical products. IEBE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 7(I):78-94, 1991.
 
4
N. Birnbaum and D. Halperin. A randomized approach to assembly planning along paths, l#anuscript, 1998.
 
5
H. Chang and T. Li. Assembly maintainability study with motion planning. In Proc. IEEE Int. Confi on Rob. and Aurora., pages 1012-1019, 1995.
 
6
 
7
M. de Berg, L. J. Guibas, and D. Halpefin. Vertical decompositions for triangles in 3-space. Diacrete Gomput. Geom., 15:35--61, 1996.
 
8
 
9
A. Ddchambre and P. Gaspart. KBAP: An industrial prototype of knowledge-based assembly planner. In Proe. IEBB Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 2404-2409, 1992.
 
10
B. 1t. Donald. The complexity of planar compliant motion plan,#ng under uncertainly. Algorithmiea, 5:353-- 382, 1990.
 
11
K.Y. Goldberg. Orienting polygonal parts without sensors. Algorithmica, 10:201-225, 1993.
12
 
13
M. Goldwasser, J.-C. Latombe, and R. Motwani. Comple#l#y measures for assembly sequences. In Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 1581- 1587, 1996.
 
14
M. Goldwasser and R. Motwani. Complexity measures for assembly sequences. International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications. To appear.
 
15
 
16
L. Guibas and F. F. Yao. On translating a set of ree#- angles. Advances in Computing Research, 1:235-260, 1983.
 
17
L.J. Guibas, D. Halperin, H. Hinakawa, J.-C. Latombe, and R. H. Wilson. A simple and efficient procedure for polyhedral assembly partitioning under infinitesimal motions, in Proe. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 2553-2560, 1995.
 
18
 
19
D. Halpe_dn and R. H. Wilson. Assembly partitioning along simple paths: the case of multiple translations. Advanced Robotics, 11:127'-145, 1997'.
 
20
H. ttJrulmwa, T. Matsui, and K. Takase. Automatic determination of possible vdoeity and applicable force of frietionless objects in contaet# from a geometric model. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 10(3):309-- 322, 1994.
 
21
R. L. Hoffman. Automated assembly in a CSG domain. In Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 210--215, 1989.
 
22
 
23
L. S. Homem de Mello and A. C. Sanderson. A correct and complete algorithm for the generation of meeharficol assembly sequences. Iggg Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 7(2):228-240, 1991.
 
24
It. E. Jones and R. H. Wilson. A survey of constraints in assembly planning. In /)roe. IBEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 1525-32, 1996.
 
25
R. E. Jones and R. H. Wilson. Aa interactive assembly planning system. In Video Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1997.
 
26
R. E. Jones, It. H. Wilson, and T. L. Calton. Constraint-based interactive assembly planning. In Proe. IEEE intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 913-920, 1997.
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
J.-C. Latombe, R. H. Wilson, and F. Cazals. Assembly sequencing with tolcranced par#s. Computer-Aided Design, 29(2):159-174, Feb. 1997.
 
32
A. Lazanas and J. C. Latombe. Landmark-based robot navigation. Algorithmica, 13:472-501, 1995.
 
33
T. Lozano-P&ez. Spatial planning: A configuration space approach. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C- (2):1o8-12o, lo83.
 
34
B. Mishra, J. T. Schwartz, and M. Shark. On the existence and synthesis of multifmger positive grips. Algo. rithmica, 2:541-558, 1987.
35
 
36
 
37
 
38
 
39
B. Romney, C. Godard, M. Goldwasser, and G. Rtmaku. mar. An efficient system for geometric assembly sequence generation and evaluation. In Proc. A SME Intl. Computers in Engineering Conf., pages 699-712, 1095.
 
40
A. Schw#d and B.. It. Wilson. Assembly sequences for polyhedra. Algorithmica, 13(6):539-562, 1995.
 
41
C. Wentink, A. F. van der Stappen, and M. Overmars. Algorithms for fixture design. In J.-P. Laumond and M. Overmars, editors, Algorithms }or Robotic Mo#ion and Manipulation: 1996 WAFR, pages 321-346. A. K. Peters, 1997.
 
42
 
43
R. H. Wilson. Geometric reasoning abou# assembly tools. Technical Report SAND95-2423, Sandla National Labs, 1996. To appear in Artificial Intelligence.
 
44
 
45
 
46
R. H. Wilson and T. Matsui. Partitioning aa assembly for infmil#esimal motions in translation and rotation. In Proe. Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robot# and Sy#tcm#, pages 1311-1318, 1992.
 
47
 
48
T. C. Woo. Au#omatlc disassembly and total ordcrlng in. three dimensions. In Conf. on Intelligent and Integrated Manufacturing Analysis and Synthesis, pages 291-303, 1987'.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Dan Halperin: colleagues
Jean-Claude Latombe: colleagues
Randall H. Wilson: colleagues