ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Profiling successful reengineering projects
Full text PdfPdf (161 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 41 ,  Issue 6  (June 1998) table of contents
Pages: 96 - 102  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
James T. C. Teng  Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia
Seung Ryul Jeong  Kookmin Univ., Seoul, South Korea
Varun Grover  Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 131,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/276609.276625
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Davenport, T.H. and Short, J. The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review 31, 4 (1990), 11-27.
 
2
 
3
DeLone, W. and McLean, E.R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Info. Syst. Research 3, 1 (1992), 60-95.
 
4
Grover, V., Jeong, S.Y., Kettinger, W.J., and Teng, J.T.C. The implementation of business process reengineering.J. Manage. Info. Syst. 12, 1 (Fall 1995), 109-144.
 
5
Hall, G., Rosenthal, J., and Wade, J. How to make reengineering really work. Harvard Business Review 71, 6 (Nov.-Dec. 1993), 119-131.
 
6
Hamilton, S. and Chervany, N.L. Evaluating information system effectiveness-part I: Comparing evaluation approaches. MIS Q. 5, 3 (Sept. 1981), 55-69.
 
7
Hammer, M. and Champy, J.A. Reengineering the Corporation: k Manifesto for Business Revolution. Harper Business, New York, 1993.
 
8
Kettinger, W.J., Guha, S., and Teng, J.T.C. Business process reengineering: Building the foundation for a comprehensive methodology. Or. Info. Syst. Manage. (Summer 1993), 13-22.
 
9
Klein, M.M. Reengineering methodologies and tools. Info. Syst. Manage. 11, 2 (1994), 30-35.
 
10
Schriven, M. The methodology of evaluation: Formative and summative evaluation. In C.H. Weiss, Ed., Evaluating Action Programs. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, 1972.
 
11
Stoddard, D. and Jarvenpaa, S. Business process reengineering: Tactics for managing radical change.J. Manage. Info. Syst. 12, 1, (Winter 1995).
 
12
Teng, J.T.C., Grover, V., and Fiedler, K. Business process reengineering: Charting a strategic path for the information age. California Management Review 36, 3 (Spring 1994), 9-31.

CITED BY  10


REVIEW

"Brad D. Reid : Reviewer"

The authors sent out 853 questionnaires, and this paper is based on 239 responses. Their essential conclusion is that “the most successful reengineering projects direct attention to social design and process transformation rather than an  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
James T. C. Teng: colleagues
Seung Ryul Jeong: colleagues
Varun Grover: colleagues