WYSIWIS revised: early experiences with multiuser interfaces

ABSTRACT

WYSIWIS (What You See Is What I See) is a foundational abstraction for multiuser interfaces that expresses many of the characteristics of a chalkboard in face-to-face meetings. In its strictest interpretation, it means that everyone can also see the same written information and also see where anyone else is pointing. In our attempts to build software support for collaboration in meetings, we have discovered that WYSIWIS is crucial, yet too inflexible when strictly enforced. This paper is about the design issues and choices that arose in our first generation of meeting tools based on WYSIWIS. Several examples of multiuser interfaces that start from this abstraction are presented. These tools illustrate that there are inherent conflicts between the needs of a group and the needs of individuals, since user interfaces compete for the same display space and meeting time. To help minimize the effect of these conflicts, constraints were relaxed along four key dimensions of WYSIWIS: display space, time of display, subgroup population, and congruence of view. Meeting tools must be designed to support the changing needs of information sharing during process transitions, as subgroups are formed and dissolved, as individuals shift their focus of activity, and as the group shifts from multiple parallel activities to a single focused activity and back again.

REFERENCES

• 1: S. A. Bly , J. K. Rosenberg, A comparison of tiled and overlapping windows, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.101-106, April 13-17, 1986, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 2: CARD, S. 'Windows': Why they were invented, how they help. The Office (Mar. 1985), 52-54.
• 3: CARD, S., PAVEL, M., AND FARRELL, J.E. Window-based computer dialogues. In Proceedings of the IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction~iNTERACT-'84. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 239-243.
• 4: James Donahue , Jennifer Widom, Whiteboards: a graphical database tool, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.4 n.1, p.24-41, Jan. 1986 [doi>10.1145/5401.5403]
• 5: Gregg Foster , Mark Stefik, Cognoter: theory and practice of a colab-orative tool, Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, December 03-05, 1986, Austin, Texas [doi>10.1145/637069.637072]
• 6: Irene Greif , Robert Seliger , William E. Weihl, Atomic data abstractions in a distributed collaborative editing system, Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages, p.160-172, January 01, 1986, St. Petersburg Beach, Florida [doi>10.1145/512644.512659]
• 7: HENDERSON, D. A., AND CARD, S.K. Rooms: The use of multiple virtual workspaces to reduce space contention in a window-based graphical user interface. Intelligent Systems Laboratory, Tech. Rep., Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, Calif., July 1986.
• 8: PANKO, R.R. Office work. Office: Technol. People 2, 1964, 205-238.
• 9: SCHNEIDERMAN, B. Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages. IEEE Cornput. (Aug. 1983), 57-69.
• 10: Mark Stefik , Gregg Foster , Daniel G. Bobrow , Kenneth Kahn , Stan Lanning , Lucy Suchman, Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings, Communications of the ACM, v.30 n.1, p.32-47, Jan. 1987 [doi>10.1145/7885.7887]

INDEX TERMS

Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: User interfaces

  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human information processing; Human factors
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors