ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Student readers' use of library documents: implications for library technologies
Full text PdfPdf (1.15 MB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pages: 233 - 240  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:0-201-30987-4
Authors
Kenton O'Hara  Xerox Research Centre Europe, Cambridge Laboratory, 61 Regent St., Cambridge, CB2 1AB, U.K.
Fiona Smith  Xerox Research Centre Europe, Cambridge Laboratory, 61 Regent St., Cambridge, CB2 1AB, U.K.
William Newman  Xerox Research Centre Europe, Cambridge Laboratory, 61 Regent St., Cambridge, CB2 1AB, U.K.
Abigail Sellen  Xerox Research Centre Europe, Cambridge Laboratory, 61 Regent St., Cambridge, CB2 1AB, U.K.
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 65,   Citation Count: 23
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/274644.274678
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Barry, C. (1996) The Digital Library: The needs of our users. Proceedings of International Summer School on the Digital Library, 5th Aug., 1996, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
 
2
DiVesta, F.J. and Gray, S.G. (1972) Listening and notetaking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 278-287.
3
 
4
 
5
Haenggi, D. & Perfetti, C.A. (1992) Individual Differences in Reprocessing of Text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 182-192.
 
6
Hartley, J. (1983) Notetaking Research: Resetting the Scoreboard. Bulletin of the British P~,chological Society, 36, 13-14
 
7
Kardash, C.A. & Kroeker, T.L. (1989) Effects of time of review and test expectancy on learning from text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 323-335.
 
8
Kiestra, M.D. Stokmans, M.J.W. and Kamphuis, J. (1994) End-users searching the on-line catalogue: the influence of domain and system knowledge on search patterns. Electronic Library, 12, 335-343.
 
9
Kiewra, K.A. (1985) Investigating note-taking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychology, 8, 336-374.
 
10
Kiewra, K.A. (1989) A review of note-taking: the encoding storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147-172.
11
 
12
Lonka, IC Lindblom-Yvonne, S. and Maury, S. (1994) The effect of study strategy on learning from text. Learning and Instruction, 4, 253-271.
13
 
14
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L. and Pressley, M. (1994) College students' theory of note-taking derived from their perception of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 323-338.
19
 
20
Wood, F., Ford, N., Miller, D., Sobczyk, G. and Duffin, R. (1996) Information Skills, searching Behaviour and cognitive styles for student learning: a computer assisted approach. Journal of Information Science, 22, 79-92.

CITED BY  23

Collaborative Colleagues:
Kenton O'Hara: colleagues
Fiona Smith: colleagues
William Newman: colleagues
Abigail Sellen: colleagues