ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The effects of distance in local versus remote human-computer interaction
Full text PdfPdf (724 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pages: 103 - 108  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:0-201-30987-4
Author
Youngme Moon  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room 14E-303, Cambridge, MA
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 58,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/274644.274660
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Kerckhoff A. C. (1974). The social context of interpersonal attraction. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York: Academic Press.
 
2
Lafferty, J. C., Eady, P. M, & Elmers, J.. 0974). The desert survival problem. Plymouth, Michigan: Experimental Learning Methods.
 
3
Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
 
4
Moon, Y., & Nass, C.I. (1996) How "real" are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Communication Research, 23, 651-674.
 
5
Nahemow, L., & Lawton, M. P. (1975). Similarity and propinquity in friendship formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 205-213.
 
6
 
7
Nass, C. I., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997). Are computers gender-neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 864-876.
 
8
 
9
Nass, C. I., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B., & Dryer, D. C. (1995). Human-computer interaction as interpersonal interaction. Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction (CHI) '95 Conference, Denver, CO.
 
10
 
11
Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
 
12
Paulhus, D.L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
 
13
Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightman (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Volume 1 (pp. 17-59). San Diego: Academic Press.
 
14
Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307-317.
 
15
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation. Stanford, CA: Cambridge University Press/CSLI.
 
16
Segal, M. W. (1974). Alphabet and attraction: An unobtrusive measure of the effect of propinquity in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 654-657.