ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Futures for partitioning in physical design (tutorial)
Full text PdfPdf (646 KB)
Source International Symposium on Physical Design archive
Proceedings of the 1998 international symposium on Physical design table of contents
Monterey, California, United States
Pages: 190 - 193  
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:1-58113-021-X
Author
Andrew B. Kahng  UCLA Computer Science Department, Los Angeles, CA
Sponsors
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/274535.274563
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The context for partitioning in physical design is dominated by two concerns: top-down design and the focus on spatial embedding. The role of partitioning is exactly that of a facilitator of divide-and-conquer metaheuristics for floorplanning, timing and placement optimization. Formulations or optimization objectives for partitioning follow from its context and role. Finally, the available algorithm technology determines how effectively we can address a given partitioning formulation and optimize a given objective. This invited paper considers the future of partitioning for physical design in light of these factors, and proposes a list of technology needs. A living version of this paper can be found at vlsicad.cs.ucla.edu.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C.J. Alpe~ personal communication, February 1998.
2
 
3
4
5
 
6
 
7
A.E. Ca/dwell, A. B. Kahng and L L. Markov, manuscript, 1997.
 
8
W. E. Donath, "Logic Partitioning", in B. Preas and M. Lorenzetfi, eds., Physical Design Automation in VLSI Systems, Benjamin/Cummings, 1988.
 
9
A. E. Dunlop and B. W. Kernighan, "A Procedure for Placement of Standard Cell VLSI Circuits", IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design 4(1) (19853, pp. 92-98.
 
10
 
11
S. Hauck and G. Bordello, "~n Evaluation ofBipartitioning Tcchr~qucs", IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design 16 (1997), pp. 849-866.
12
13
 
14
 
15
A. B. Kahng end R. Sharma, "Studies of Clnstedng Objectives anti Heuristics for Improved Standard-Cell Hacemenf', ~~script, 1997.
16
17
 
18
E. L Lawler, IC N. Levitt and J. "Itnner, "Module Clustering to ~'Hn~mb'e Delay in DigitalNetwodc~", 1EEE Trans. on Computers lg (1969), pp. 47-57.
 
19
 
20
J. L~llis, personal communication, February 1998.
 
21
1L X. T. Nijssen and J. A. (3. Jess, "1Veo-Dimensional Datapzth Regularity Extraction", Pro~ ACMISIGDA Physical Design Workshop, Apd11996, pp. 111-117.
 
22
 
23
Semiconductor Industry Association, "The National Technology Roaflmap for Semiconductors: Technology Needs", December 1997.
 
24
 
25
P. tL Suaris and G. Ke~m, "Quaddsection: A New Approach to Standard Cell Layout," Pro~ IEEE/ACMIntemational Conferex~ce on Computer-Aided Design, 1987, pp. 474-477.
 
26
 
27
 
28
C.-Wo Yell, C-K. Cheng and T.-T. ~. I2n, "'Opfimiz~on by Iterative Improvement: An Experimental Evaluation on TWo-Way Peaaitioning'; IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design 14 (1995), pp. 145-153.