| A virtual learning environment for entity relationship modelling |
| Full text |
Pdf
(741 KB)
|
| Source
|
Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
archive
Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Pages: 345 - 349
Year of Publication: 1998
ISBN:0-89791-994-7
Also published in ...
|
|
Authors
|
|
Lynne Hall
|
Department of Computing, University of Northumbria, Newcastle, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE18ST, UK
|
|
Adrian Gordon
|
Department of Computing, University of Northumbria, Newcastle, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE18ST, UK
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 58, Citation Count: 3
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Entity Relationship Modelling (ERM) is a fundamental skill in database design. Though ERM concepts are simple, the modelling process itself is a complex activity. Novice ER modellers make systematic errors in their models. Current tool-based support for learning ER modelling is limited, since it concentrates on notation at the expense of methodology, and provides little or no feedback to the learner about the quality of her constructed models. A text-based virtual learning environment, based on the Multi-User Dimension paradigm, is described, in which learners undertake ER modelling tasks by interacting with objects in a virtual world. This learning environment concentrates on the methodology of ER modelling rather than its notation, and provides immediate feedback to a learner about the quality of her models. Preliminary results suggest that this learning environment is both easy to use and effective.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Acker, S.R., Space, collaboration, and the credible city: Academic work in the virtual university, ,Tour. Computer- Mediated Communication, 1, 1, (1995).
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Batra, D. And Antony, S.R., Novice Errors in Conceptual Database Design, European Jour. Information Systems, 3, 1, (Jan, 1994)57-69
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Chen, P.P., English Sentence Structure and Entity Relationship Diagrams, Information Science, (May 1983), 221-243.
|
| |
8
|
Fanderclai, T.L., MUDs in Education: New' Environments, New Pedagogues, CMC Magazine, 2, 1 (Jan 1995).
|
| |
9
|
Hannafin, M. J., Emerging technologies, ISD, and learning environments: Critical perspectives, Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 1, (1992), 49- 63.
|
| |
10
|
H0ffer, J., An Empirical Investigation into Individual Differences in Database Models, Proc. 3rdInt. Conf. Information Systems, (1982), 1"53-167.
|
| |
11
|
Hoggarth, G.R., and Lockyer, M.A., Systems development methods guidance and CASE: integration between CASE and CAL~ Software Engineering Journal, (May 1996), 141-147
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Reeves, T., Evaluating What Really Matters in Computer-Based Education, at http://www.oltc.edu.au/cp/refs/reeves.html
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
NASA Software Technology Branch. CLIPS Reference Manual, 1997
|
|