Reengineering inspection

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Reengineering inspection

Full text

Pdf (38 KB)

Source

Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 41 , Issue 2 (February 1998) table of contents

Pages: 49 - 52

Year of Publication: 1998

ISSN:0001-0782

Author

Philip M. Johnson

Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 57, Citation Count: 14

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms review collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/269012.269020 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Michael Dyer, The cleanroom approach to quality software development, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1992
	2	Fagan,M E .Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program developm ent. IBM SYST. 15, 3 (1976)pp.182-211.
	3	Tom Gilb , Dorothy Graham , Susannah Finzi, Software Inspection, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1993
	4	Robert B. Grady , Tom Van Slack, Key Lessons in Achieving Widespread Inspection Use, IEEE Software, v.11 n.4, p.46-57, July 1994 [doi>10.1109/52.300084]
	5	Philip M. Johnson, An instrumented approach to improving software quality through formal technical review, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering, p.113-122, May 16-21, 1994, Sorrento, Italy
	6	KJerk, I. Electronic software deign review smooth development process. Totalty quality 16 Dec. 1993).
	7	Adam A. Porter , Lawrence G. Votta, Jr. , Victor R. Basili, Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections: A Replicated Experiment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.21 n.6, p.563-575, June 1995 [doi>10.1109/32.391380]
	8	Lawrence G. Votta, Jr., Does every inspection need a meeting?, Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering, p.107-114, December 08-10, 1993, Los Angeles, California, United States
	9	Edward F. Weller, Lessons from Three Years of Inspection Data, IEEE Software, v.10 n.5, p.38-45, September 1993 [doi>10.1109/52.232397]

CITED BY 14

	Terry Shepard , Diane Kelly, How to do inspections when there is no time, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, p.718, May 12-19, 2001, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
	Terry Shepard , Margaret Lamb , Diane Kelly, More testing should be taught, Communications of the ACM, v.44 n.6, p.103-108, June 2001
	Laurie Williams , Richard L. Upchurch, In support of student pair-programming, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.33 n.1, p.327-331, March 2001
	Diane Kelly , Terry Shepard, Task-directed software inspection technique: an experiment and case study, Proceedings of the 2000 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, p.6, November 13-16, 2000, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
	Diane Kelly , Terry Shepard, An experiment to investigate interacting versus nominal groups in software inspection, Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, p.122-134, October 06-09, 2003, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
	Craig K. Tyran , Joey F. George, Improving software inspections with group process support, Communications of the ACM, v.45 n.9, p.87-92, September 2002
	Padmal Vitharana , K. Ramamurthy, Computer-Mediated Group Support, Anonymity, and the Software Inspection Process: An Empirical Investigation, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.29 n.2, p.167-180, February 2003
	Diane Kelly , Terry Shepard, Task-directed software inspection, Journal of Systems and Software, v.73 n.2, p.361-368, October 2004
	Gernot A. Liebchen , Martin Shepperd, Data sets and data quality in software engineering, Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Predictor models in software engineering, May 12-13, 2008, Leipzig, Germany
	Abdusalam Nwesri , Khairuddin Hashim, A model and tool features for collaborative artifact inspection and review, WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS, v.7 n.10, p.1038-1047, October 2008
	Abdusalam Nwesri , Khairuddin Hashim, A model and tool features for collaborative artifact inspection and review, WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS, v.7 n.10, p.1038-1047, October 2008
	Peter C. Rigby , Daniel M. German , Margaret-Anne Storey, Open source software peer review practices: a case study of the apache server, Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering, May 10-18, 2008, Leipzig, Germany
	Abdusalam Nwesri , Khairuddin Hashim, A model for collaborative artifact inspection and review, Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS international conference on Computers, p.964-967, July 23-25, 2008, Heraklion, Greece
	Sami Kollanus, Experiences from using ICMM in inspection process assessment, Software Quality Control, v.17 n.2, p.177-187, June 2009

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
K. Computing Milieux
K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
K.6.3 Software Management
Subjects: Software development

Additional Classification:
D. Software
D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
D.2.4 Software/Program Verification
Subjects: Validation
D.2.9 Management
Subjects: Software quality assurance (SQA)

I. Computing Methodologies
I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
I.2.2 Automatic Programming
Subjects: Program verification

General Terms:
Documentation, Economics, Human Factors, Management, Verification

REVIEW

"Leo G. Egan, Jr. : Reviewer"

Formal technical reviews (FTRs) are often considered wasteful and without purpose in the software industry. Consequently, they are grudgingly conducted, more to complete a schedule milestone than for the tangible benefits they can yield. As I more...

Collaborative Colleagues:

Philip M. Johnson: colleagues

Adobe Acrobat

QuickTime

Windows Media Player

Real Player