ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
It is a far, far better mean I find…
Full text PdfPdf (905 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Pages: 31 - 38  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-7803-4278-X
Author
Susan M. Sanchez  School of Business Administration, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 8001 Natural Bridge Road, St. Louis, Missouri
Sponsors
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-SMCS : Systems, Man & Cybernetics Society
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
INFORMS/CS : Computer Science TC
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
SCS : Society for Computer Simulation
ASA : American Statistical Association
IEEE : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 8,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/268437.268444
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Banks, J., J. S. Carson and B. L. Nelson. 1996. Discrete-event system simulation, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
 
2
Bechhofer, R. E. 1954. A single-sample multiple decision procedure for ranking means of normal populations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 25:16- 29.
 
3
Bechhofer, R. E., C. W. Dunnett and M. Sobel. 1954. A two-sample multiple decision procedure for ranking means of normal populations with a common unknown variance. Biometrika 41:170- 176.
 
4
Bechhofer, R. E., S. Elmaghraby and N. Morse. 1959. A single-stage multiple decision procedure for selecting the multinomial event which has the highest probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30:102-119.
 
5
Bechhofer, R. E., and D. M. Goldsman. 1986. Truncation of the Bechhofer-Kiefer-Sobel procedure for selecting the multinomial event which has the largest probability (II): extended tables and an improved procedure. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation B15:829- 851.
 
6
Bechhofer, R. E., D. M. Goldsman and T. J. Santner. 1995. Design and analysis for statistical selection, screening and multiple comparisons. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
 
7
Bechhofer, R. E., ana B. W. Turnbull. 1978. Two (k+l)-decision selection procedures for comparing k normal means with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association 73:385-392.
 
8
Chen, H. J., and H. M. Zhang. 1993. Procedures for simultaneous estimation and selection of the best population with a preliminary test. American Journal of Mathematics and Management Science 13:195-216.
 
9
 
10
Dudewisz, E. J., and S. R. Dalal. 1975. Allocation of observations in ranking and selection with unequal variances. SankyE B37:28-78.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
Gupta, S. S. 1965. On some multiple decision (selection and ranking) rules. Technometrics 7:225- 245.
 
15
Gupta, S. S., and D.-Y. Huang. 1976. Subset selection procedures for the means and variances of normal populations: unequal sample sizes. SankyTi B38:112-128.
 
16
Gupta, S. S., and S. Panchepakesan. 1979. Multiple decision procedures. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
 
17
Gupta, S. S., and M. Sobel. 1958. On selecting a subset which contains all populations better than a standard. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 28:957-967.
 
18
Gupta, S. S., and M. Sobel. 1960. Selecting a subset containing the best of several binomial populations. Chapter 20 in Contributions to Probability and Statistics, ed. Ulkin, Ghurye, Hoeffding, Madow and Mann. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
 
19
 
20
Hsu, J. C. 1984. Constrained simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple comparisons with the best. Annals of Statistics 12:1136-1144.
 
21
Hsu, J. C. 1996. Multiple comparisons: Theory and methods. London, England: Chapman and Hall.
 
22
Hsu, J. C., and M. Peruggia. 1994. Graphical representation of Tukey's multiple comparison method. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 3:143-161.
 
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
Matejcik, F. J., and B. L. Nelson. 1995. Two-stage multiple comparisons with the best for computer simulation. Operations Research 43(4):633-640.
 
28
Miller, J. O., B. L. Nelson and C. H. Reilly. 1996. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
 
29
 
30
Mukhodpadhyay, N., and T. S. Solanky. 1994. Multistage selection and ranking procedures. New York: Marcel Dekker.
 
31
32
 
33
 
34
35
 
36
Paulson, E. 1952. On the comparison of several experimental categories with a control. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23:239-246.
 
37
 
38
Rinott, Y. 1978. On two-stage seiection procedures and related probability inequalities. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods A7(8):799-811.
 
39
Sanchez, S. M. 1987a. A modified least-failures sampling procedure for Bernoulli subset selection. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 16(12):3609-3629.
 
40
Sanchez, S. M. 1987b. Small-sample performance of a modified least-failures sampling procedure for Bernoulli subset selection, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 16(4):1051-1065.
 
41
 
42
Sanchez, S. M., and J. L. Higle, 1922; Observational studies of rare events: a subset selection approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87(149):878-883.
 
43
Sanchez, S. M., P. J. Sanchez, J. S. Ramberg and F. Moeeni. 1996. Effective engineering design through simulation. International Transactions on Operational Research 3(2):169-185.
 
44
Taguchi, G. 1986. Introduction to quality engineering. White Plains, New York: UNIPUB/Krauss International.
 
45
Tamhane, A. C. 1977. Multiple comparisons in model I: One-way ANOVA with unequal variances. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods A6:15-32.
 
46
 
47
Yang, W.-N., and B. L. Nelson. 1991. Using common random numbers and control variates in multiple-comparison procedures. Operations Research 39(4):583-591.