| Avoiding object misconceptions |
| Full text |
Pdf
(461 KB)
|
| Source
|
Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
archive
Proceedings of the twenty-eighth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
table of contents
San Jose, California, United States
Pages: 131 - 134
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-889-4
Also published in ...
|
|
Authors
|
|
Simon Holland
|
The Open University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK76AA, United Kingdom
|
|
Robert Griffiths
|
The Open University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK76AA, United Kingdom
|
|
Mark Woodman
|
The Open University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK76AA, United Kingdom
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10, Downloads (12 Months): 64, Citation Count: 25
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper identifies and describes a number of misconceptions observed in students learning about object technology. It identifies simple, concrete, measures course designers and teachers can take to avoid these misconceptions arising. The context for this work centres on an introductory undergraduate course and a postgraduate course. Both these courses are taught by distance education. These courses both use Smalltalk as an introduction to object technology. More particularly, the undergraduate course uses Smalltalk as a first programming language.Distance education can limit the amount and speed of individual feedback that can be given in the early stages of learning. For this reason, particular attention has been paid to characterizing measures for avoiding elementary misconceptions seen in beginning learners. At the same time we also address some misconceptions observed in postgraduate students. The pedagogical issues discussed are of particular importance when devising an extended series of examples for teaching or assessment, or when designing a visual microworld to be used for teaching purposes.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R. and Vlissides, J. Design Patterns, Addison Wesley, New York, 1995.
|
| |
3
|
Prieto, Maximo. The importance of learning Objectoriented thinking, Proceedings of Workshop on Learning, Training and Teaching in Object Technology, part of European Conference on Object Oriented Programming, Aarhus, Denmark, 1995.
|
| |
4
|
Le~nardi, C., Prieto, M., Rossi, G., Levato, A., Echarri, F., Maciel, R. Micro-worlds: A tool for learning object-oriented modeling and problem solving. Proceedings of Educators Symposium, OOPSLA "94, Portland Oregon (October 1994).
|
 |
5
|
|
CITED BY 25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jürgen Börstler, Improving CRC-card role-play with role-play diagrams, Companion to the 20th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, October 16-20, 2005, San Diego, CA, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kate Sanders , Jonas Boustedt , Anna Eckerdal , Robert McCartney , Jan Erik Moström , Lynda Thomas , Carol Zander, Student understanding of object-oriented programming as expressed in concept maps, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.40 n.1, March 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jürgen Börstler , Henrik B. Christensen , Jens Bennedsen , Marie Nordström , Lena Kallin Westin , Jan Erik Moström , Michael E. Caspersen, Evaluating OO example programs for CS1, Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 30-July 02, 2008, Madrid, Spain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|