ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Avoiding object misconceptions
Full text PdfPdf (461 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the twenty-eighth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
San Jose, California, United States
Pages: 131 - 134  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-889-4
Also published in ...
Authors
Simon Holland  The Open University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK76AA, United Kingdom
Robert Griffiths  The Open University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK76AA, United Kingdom
Mark Woodman  The Open University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK76AA, United Kingdom
Sponsor
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 64,   Citation Count: 25
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/268084.268132
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper identifies and describes a number of misconceptions observed in students learning about object technology. It identifies simple, concrete, measures course designers and teachers can take to avoid these misconceptions arising. The context for this work centres on an introductory undergraduate course and a postgraduate course. Both these courses are taught by distance education. These courses both use Smalltalk as an introduction to object technology. More particularly, the undergraduate course uses Smalltalk as a first programming language.Distance education can limit the amount and speed of individual feedback that can be given in the early stages of learning. For this reason, particular attention has been paid to characterizing measures for avoiding elementary misconceptions seen in beginning learners. At the same time we also address some misconceptions observed in postgraduate students. The pedagogical issues discussed are of particular importance when devising an extended series of examples for teaching or assessment, or when designing a visual microworld to be used for teaching purposes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R. and Vlissides, J. Design Patterns, Addison Wesley, New York, 1995.
 
3
Prieto, Maximo. The importance of learning Objectoriented thinking, Proceedings of Workshop on Learning, Training and Teaching in Object Technology, part of European Conference on Object Oriented Programming, Aarhus, Denmark, 1995.
 
4
Le~nardi, C., Prieto, M., Rossi, G., Levato, A., Echarri, F., Maciel, R. Micro-worlds: A tool for learning object-oriented modeling and problem solving. Proceedings of Educators Symposium, OOPSLA "94, Portland Oregon (October 1994).
5

CITED BY  25

Collaborative Colleagues:
Simon Holland: colleagues
Robert Griffiths: colleagues
Mark Woodman: colleagues