ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Feature-based similarity assessment of solid models
Full text PdfPdf (1.40 MB)
Source ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling archive
Proceedings of the fourth ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Pages: 297 - 310  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-946-7
Authors
Alexei Elinson  Department of Computer Science and Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Dana S. Nau  Department of Computer Science and Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
William C. Regli  Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA and Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 41,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/267734.267806
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Elinson, D. Nau, and W. C. Regti. Solid similarity measurements. Technical Report ISR-TR96-63, The University of Maryland, 1996.
 
2
C. C. Gallagher and W. A. Knight. Group Technology Production Methods in Manufacture. Ellis Horwood Limited, Market Cross House, Cooper Street, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1EB, England, 1986. ISBN 0-470-20294-7.
 
3
Satyandra K. Gupta. Automated Manufacturability Analysis of Machined Parts. PhD thesis, The University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 1994.
4
 
5
 
6
A. Houtzeel. Miclass, a classification system based on group technology. Technical Report Working Paper MS #75-721, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1975.
 
7
 
8
Y. C. Lee and K. S. Fu. Machine understanding of csg: extraction and unification of manufacturing features. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 7(1):20-32, 1987.
 
9
S. P. Mitrofanov. The Scientific Principles of Group Technology. National Lending Library Translation, 1966.
 
10
H. Opitz. A Classification to Describe Workpieces. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1970.
 
11
W. C. Regli, S. K. Gupta, and D. S, Nau. Toward multiprocessor feature recognition. Computer Aided Design, 1997. To appear.
 
12
William C. Regli, Satyandra K. Gupta, and Dana S. Nau. Extracting alternative machining features: An algorithmic approach. Research in Engineering Design, 1995. To appear.
 
13
J. Shah, Y. Shen, and A. Shirur. Determination of machining volumes from extensible sets of design features. In Jami Shah, Martti M~intyl~i, and Dana Nau, editors, Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, pages 129- 157. Elsevier/North Holland, 1994.
 
14
J. J. Shah and A. Bhatnagar. Group technology classification from feature-based geometric models. Manufacturing Review, 2(3):204-213, 1989.
 
15
A. Srikantappa and R. Crawford. Automatic part coding based on interfeature relationships. In Jami Shah, Martti Mantyl~i, and Dana Nau, editors, Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, pages 215-237. Elsevier/North Holland, 1994.
 
16
T.-L. Sun, C.-J. Su, R.J. Mayer, and R.A. Wysk. Shape similarity assessment of mechanical parts based on solid models. In Design Engineering Technical Conferences, volume 83(2), pages 953-962. ASME, 1995.
 
17
 
18

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alexei Elinson: colleagues
Dana S. Nau: colleagues
William C. Regli: colleagues