ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An automated meeting scheduling system that utilizes user preferences
Full text PdfPdf (702 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the first international conference on Autonomous agents table of contents
Marina del Rey, California, United States
Pages: 308 - 315  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-877-0
Authors
Thomas Haynes  Department of Mathematical & Computer Sciences, University of Tulsa, 600 South College Avenue, Tulsa, OK
Sandip Sen  Department of Mathematical & Computer Sciences, University of Tulsa, 600 South College Avenue, Tulsa, OK
Neeraj Arora  Department of Mathematical & Computer Sciences, University of Tulsa, 600 South College Avenue, Tulsa, OK
Rajani Nadella  Department of Mathematical & Computer Sciences, University of Tulsa, 600 South College Avenue, Tulsa, OK
Sponsors
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 51,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/267658.267733
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Crispin, M. 1994. INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL- VERSION 4. Request for Comments (Experimental) RFC 1730, Internet Engineering Task Force.
 
2
}Dent, L.; Boticario, J.; McDermott, J.; Mitchell, T.; and Zabowski, D. 1992. A personal learning apprentice. In Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 96-103.
 
3
}Gosling, J., and McGilton, H. 1995. The Java Language Environment. Sun Microsystems Computer Company.
 
4
Greif, I. 1982. PCAL' A personal calendar. Technical Report TM-213, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, Cambridge, Mass.
 
5
Grudin, J. 1987. Social evaluation of the user interface: Who does the work and who gets the benefit? In Bullinger, H., and Shacketl, B., eds., Human Computer Interaction - INTERACT87. North Holland. 805-811.
 
6
Haynes, T., and Sen, S. 1996. Satisfying user preferences while negotiating meetings. In Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems. (submitted for review).
 
7
 
8
Kelley, J. F., and Chapanis, A. 1982. How professional persons keep their calendars: implications for computerization. Journal of Occupational Psychology 55:141-156.
9
10
 
11
Sen, S., and Durfee, E. H. 1994. On the design of an adaptive meeting scheduler. In Proc. of the Tenth IEEE Conference on A I Applications, 40-46.
 
12
 
13
Smith, R.G. 1980. The contract net protocol: High-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on Computers C- 29(12):1104-1113.
 
14
Taub, E. 1993. Sharing schedules. MacUser 155-162.
 
15
Weld, D. S.; Marks, J.; and Bobrow, D. G. 1995. The role of intelligent systems in the national information infrastructure. AI Magazine 16(3):45-64.

CITED BY  16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Thomas Haynes: colleagues
Sandip Sen: colleagues
Neeraj Arora: colleagues
Rajani Nadella: colleagues