ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An autonomous spacecraft agent prototype
Full text PdfPdf (935 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the first international conference on Autonomous agents table of contents
Marina del Rey, California, United States
Pages: 253 - 261  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-877-0
Authors
Barney Pell  Caelum Research, NASA Ames Research Center, MS 269/2, Moffett Field, CA
Douglas E. Bernard  Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA
Steve A. Chien  Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA
Erann Gat  Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA
Nicola Muscettola  Recom Technologies, NASA Ames Research Centre, MS 269/2, Mofett Field, CA
P. Pandurang Nayak  Recom Technologies, NASA Ames Research Centre, MS 269/2, Mofett Field, CA
Michael D. Wagner  Fourth Planet, 155A Moffett Park Drive, Suite 104, Sunnyvale, CA
Brian C. Williams  Recom Technologies, NASA Ames Research Centre, MS 269/2, Mofett Field, CA
Sponsors
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 21
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/267658.267724
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ahmed, A.; Aljabri, A. S.; and Eldred, D. 1994. Demonstration of on-board maneuver planning using autonomous s/w architecture. In AIAA/USU Conf. on Small Satellites.
 
2
Bonasso, R. P.; Kortenkamp, D.; Miller, D.; and Slack, M. 1996. Experiences with an architecture for intelligent, reactive agents. JETAL to appear.
 
3
Brown, G.; Bernard, D.; and Rasmussen, R. 1995. Attitude and articulation control for the cassini spacecraft: A fault tolerance overview. In 14th AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference.
 
4
 
5
de Kleer, J., and Williams, B. C. 1989. Diagnosis with behavioral modes. In Procs. of IJCAI. 89, 1324-1330.
 
6
de Kleer, J., and Williams, B. C., eds. 1991. Art. Int. 51.
 
7
 
8
 
9
Gut, E. 1992. Integrating planning and reacting in a heterogeneous asynchronous architecture for controlling realworld mobile robots. In Procs. of AAAi. 9~.
 
10
Gut, E. 1996. ESL: A language for supporting robust plan execution in embedded autonomous agents. In Pryor (1996).
 
11
Georgeff, M. P., and Lansky, A. L. 1987. Procedural knowI- edge. Tech. Rep. 411, AI Center, SRI International.
 
12
Hackney, J.; Bernard, D.; and Rasmussen, R. 1993. The cassini spacecraft: Object oriented flight control software. In 1993 Guidance and Control Conference.
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
Muscettola, N.; Pen, B.; Hansson, O.; and Mohan, S. 1995. Automating mission scheduling for space-based observatories. In Henry, G., and Eaton, J., eds., Robotic Telescopes. Provo, UT: Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
 
17
Muscettola, N. 1994. HSTS: Integrating planning and scheduling. In Fox, M., and Zweben, M., eds., Intelligent Scheduling. Morgan Kaufmann.
 
18
Musliner, D.; Durfee, E.; and Shin, K. 1993. Circa: A cooperative, intelligent, real-time control architecture. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 23(6).
 
19
Noreils, F., and Chatila, R. 1995. Plan execution monitoring and control architecture for mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation.
 
20
Pell, B.; Bernard, D. E.; Chien, S. A.; Gut, E.; Muscettola, N.; Nayak, P. P.; Wagner, M. D.; and Williams, B. C. 1996a. A remote agent prototype for spacecraft autonomy. In Procs. of the SPIE Conference on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation.
 
21
Pell, B.; Gut, E.; Keesing, R.; Muscettola, N.; and Smith, B. 1996b. Plan execution for autonomous spacecraft. In Pryor (1996).
 
22
Pryor, L., ed. 1996. Procs. of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Plan Execution. AAAI Press.
 
23
Simmons, R. 1990. An architecture for coordinating planning, sensing, and action. In Procs. DARPA Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling and Control, 292-297. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
 
24
Tambe, M.; Johnson, W. L.; Jones, R. M.; Koss, F.; Laird, J. E.; Rosenbloom, P. S.; and Schwamb, K. 1995. Intelligent agents for interactive simulation environments. AI Magazine 16(1): 15-39.
 
25
 
26
Wilkins, D. E., and Myers, K. L. 1995. A common knowledge representation for plan generation and reactive execution. Journal of Logic and Computation.
 
27
Williams, B. C., and Nayak, P. P. 1996. A model-based approach to reactive self-configuring systems. In Procs. of AAAi-96, 971-978.

CITED BY  21

Collaborative Colleagues:
Barney Pell: colleagues
Douglas E. Bernard: colleagues
Steve A. Chien: colleagues
Erann Gat: colleagues
Nicola Muscettola: colleagues
P. Pandurang Nayak: colleagues
Michael D. Wagner: colleagues
Brian C. Williams: colleagues