ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Device-circuit optimization for minimal energy and power consumption in CMOS random logic networks
Full text PdfPdf (259 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 34th annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
Anaheim, California, United States
Pages: 403 - 408  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-920-3
Authors
Pankaj Pant  Georgia Institute of Technology
Vivek De  Intel Corp., Hillsboro, OR
Abhijit Chatterjee  Georgia Institute of Technology
Sponsors
EDAC : Electronic Design Automation Consortium
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 9,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/266021.266181
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We demonstrate a new approach minimizing the total ofthe static and the dynamic power dissipation components in aCMOS logic network required to operate at a specified clockfrequency using joint optimization of both device and circuitdesigns for a specific logic schematic and activity profile.We present a new approach to designing ultra low-powerCMOS logic circuits by joint optimization of supply voltage,threshold voltage and device widths for a specified speedconstraints.The static (leakage) and dynamic (switching)energy components are considered and an efficient heuristicis developed that delivers over an order of magnitude savingsin power over conventional optimization methods.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
BURR, J., AND SHOTT, J. A 200 mv self-testing encoder-decoder circuit using stanford ultra low power CMOS. In ISSCC: Digest of Technical Papers (Feb 1994), pp. 84-85.
 
3
CHANDRAKASAN, A., AND BRODERSEN, R. Minimizing power consumption in digital CMOS circuits. Proceedings of the IEEE 83, 4 (Apr 1995), 498-523.
 
4
DAVIS, J., DE, V., AND MEINDL, J. Optimal low power interconnect networks. In 1996 Symposium on VLSI Technology: Digest of Technical Papers (Jun 1996), pp. 1002-1008.
 
5
DAVIS, J., DE, V., AND MEINDL, J. A priori wiring estimations and optimal multilevel wiring networks for portable ulsi systems. In Procedings of the 46th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (May 1996), pp. 78-79.
6
 
7
LIU, D., AND SVENSSON, C. Trading speed for low power by choice of supply and threshold voltages. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 28, 1 (Jan 1993), 10-17.
8
 
9
SAKURAI, T., AND NEWTON, A. Alpha-power law MOSFET model and its applications to CMOS inverter delay and other formulas. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 25, 2 (Apr 1990), 584-594.
 
10
SAPATNEKAR, S. S., RAO, V. B., VAIDYA, P. M., AND KANG, S. M. An exact solution to the transistor sizing problem for CMOS circuits using convex optimization. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design 12, 11 (Nov 1993), 1621- 1632.
11
 
12
VEENDRICK, H. Short-circuit dissipation of static CMOS circuitry and its impact on the design of buffer circuits. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 19, 4 (Aug 1984), 468-473.

CITED BY  6

Collaborative Colleagues:
Pankaj Pant: colleagues
Vivek De: colleagues
Abhijit Chatterjee: colleagues