ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Calculating worst-case gate delays due to dominant capacitance coupling
Full text PdfPdf (98 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 34th annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
Anaheim, California, United States
Pages: 46 - 51  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-920-3
Authors
Florentin Dartu  Carnegie Mellon University, Department of ECE, Pittsburgh, PA
Lawrence T. Pileggi  Carnegie Mellon University, Department of ECE, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
EDAC : Electronic Design Automation Consortium
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 35,   Citation Count: 48
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/266021.266033
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we develop a gate level model that allows us to determinethe best and worst case delay when there is dominant interconnectcoupling. Assuming that the gate input windows oftransition are known, the model can predict the worst and bestcase noise, as well as the worst and best case impact on delay. Thisis done in terms of a Ceff based gate model under general RCinterconnect loading conditions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Bohr, "Interconnect scaling - the real limiter to high performance ULSI," Intl. Electronic Device Meeting, pp. 241- 244, 1995.
 
2
H.B. Bakoglu, "Circuits, interconnections, and packaging for VLSI," Addison-Wesley, 1990.
 
3
E Dartu, N. Menezes, L.T. Pileggi, "Performance computation for precharacterized CMOS gates with RC-loads," IEEE Transactions on CAD, vol. 15, pp. 544-553, May 1996.
 
4
T. Sakurai, A.R. Newton, "Alpha-power model, and its application to CMOS inverter delay and other formulas," IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 25, pp. 584-594, April 1990.
 
5
A.I. Kayssi, K.A. Sakallah, T.M. Burks, "Analytical transient response of CMOS inverters," IEEE Transactions on CAS-I, vol. 39, pp 42-45, January 1992.
 
6
 
7
L.T. Pillage, R.A. Rohrer "Asymptotic waveform evaluation for timing analysis," IEEE Transactions on CAD, vol. 9, pp. 352-366, 1990.
 
8
E Dartu, L.T. Pileggi, "Modeling signal waveshapes for empirical CMOS gate delay models," 6th Intl. Workshop PATMOS '96, pp. 57-66, Bologna, Italy, 1996
 
9
Y. Miki, M. Abe, Y. Ogawa, "PCHECK: A delay tool for high performance LSI design," IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 267-270, 1995.
 
10
11
 
12
J. Qian, S. pullela, L.T. Pillage, "Modeling the 'effective capacitance' of the RC interconnect," IEEE Transactions on CAD, vol. 13, pp. 1526-1535, December 1994.
 
13
ER O'Brian, T.L. Savarino, "Modeling the driving-point characteristic of resistive interconnect for accurate delay estimation," Proc. IEEE Intl. Conference Computer-Aided Design, pp. 512-515, 1989.
 
14
S.A. Kuhn, M.B. Kleiner, E Ramm, W. Weber "Interconnect Capacitances, Crosstalk, and Signal Delay in Vertical Integrated Circuits," Intl. Electronic Device Meeting, pp. 249- 252, 1995.

CITED BY  49

Collaborative Colleagues:
Florentin Dartu: colleagues
Lawrence T. Pileggi: colleagues