ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Datapath scheduling with multiple supply voltages and level converters
Full text PdfPdf (229 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES) archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 3  (July 1997) table of contents
Pages: 227 - 248  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISSN:1084-4309
Authors
Mark C. Johnson  Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN
Kaushik Roy  Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 28
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/264995.264997
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present an algorithm called MOVER (Multiple Operating Voltage Energy Reduction) to minimize datapath energy dissipation through use of multiple supply voltages. In a single voltage design, the critical path length, clock period, and number of control steps limit minimization of voltage and power. Multiple supply voltages permit localized voltage reductions to take up remaining schedule slack. MOVER initially finds one minimum voltage for an entire datapath. It then determines a second voltage for operations where there is still schedule slack. New voltages con be introduced and minimized until no schedule slack remains. MOVER was exercised for a variety of DSP datapath examples. Energy savings ranged from 0% to 50% when comparing dual to single voltage results. The benefit of going from two to three voltages never exceeded 15%. Power supply costs are not reflected in these savings, but a simple analysis shows that energy savings can be achieved even with relatively inefficient DC-DC converters. Datapath resource requirements were found to vary greatly with respect to number of supplies. Area penalties ranged from 0% to 170%. Implications of multiple voltage design for IC layout and power supply requirements are discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
CHANDRAKASAN, A. P., ET AL. 1995. Optimizing power using transformations. IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits and Syst. 14, 1 (January), 12-31.
 
2
CHANDRAKASAN, A. P, ALLMON, R., STRATAKOS, A., AND BRODERSEN, R. W 1994. Design of portable systems. In Proceedings of the Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (1994),259- 266.
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
GEBOTYS, C.g. 1995. An ILP model for simultaneous scheduling and partitioning for low power system mapping. Technical Report, Univ. of Waterloo (April).
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
RAO, D. S. 1992. The fifth order elliptic wave filter benchmark. Benchmark set: HL- Synth92, http://www.cbl.ncsu.edu/www/CBL_Docs/Bench.htm.
15
 
16
STRATAKOS, A.J. 1994. High-efficiencey low-voltage DC-DC conversion for portable applications. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Low Power Design (1994).
17

CITED BY  28

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mark C. Johnson: colleagues
Kaushik Roy: colleagues