| Multiplicative, congruential random-number generators with multiplier ± 2k1 ± 2k2 and modulus 2p - 1 |
| Full text |
Pdf
(122 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS)
archive
Volume 23 , Issue 2 (June 1997)
table of contents
Pages: 255 - 265
Year of Publication: 1997
ISSN:0098-3500
|
|
Author
|
|
Pei-Chi Wu
|
National Chiao Tung Univ., Taiwan, China
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20, Downloads (12 Months): 74, Citation Count: 8
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The demand for random numbers in scientific applications is increasing. However, the most widely used multiplicative, congruential random-number generators with modulus 231 − 1 have a cycle length of about 2.1 × 109. Moreover, developing portable and efficient generators with a larger modulus such as 261 − 1 is more difficult than those with modulus 231 − 1. This article presents the development of multiplicative, congruential generators with modulus m = 2p − 1 and four forms of multipliers: 2k1 &minus 2k2,
2k1 + 2k2, m − 2k1 + 2k2, and m − 2k1 − 2k2, k1 > k2. The multipliers for modulus 231 − 1 and 261 − 1 are measured by spectral tests, and the best ones are presented. The generators with these multipliers are portable and vary fast. They have also passed several empirical tests, including the frequency test, the run test, and the maximum-of-t test.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
KIRKPATRICK, S. AND STOLE, E. 1981. A very fast shift-register sequence random number generator. J. Comput. Phys. 40, 517-526.
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
SELKE, W. 1993. Cluster-flipping Monte Carlo algorithm and correlations in "good" random number generators. JETP Lett. 58, 8, 665-668.
|
REVIEW
"William J. J. Rey : Reviewer"
Multiplicative congruential generators are at the root of most
numeric simulations, and the computers are always hungry for
pseudorandom numbers. The 32-bit-based generators are still appropriate
for most users, but there is a need to go to 64
more...
|