ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
IBIS—a convincing concept…but a lousy instrument?
Full text PdfPdf (1.09 MB)
Source Designing Interactive Systems archive
Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques table of contents
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Pages: 163 - 172  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-863-0
Authors
Severin Isenmann  Forschungsinstitut für anwendungsorientierte, Wissensverarbeitung (FAW) Ulm, Helmholtzstraβe 16, 89081 Ulm (Germany)
Wolf D. Reuter  Institut für Grundlagen der Planung, (IGP) der Universität Stuttgart, Keplerstraβe 11, 70174 Stuttgart (Germany)
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
IFIP WG 13.2 : IFIP WG 13.2
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/263552.263602
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
Habermas, J. (1981). "Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns". 2 Volumes. Frankfurt.
 
5
 
6
Isenmann, S. (1993). How to Deal with Wicked Problems Using a New Type of Information System, in: "Systems Science - Addressing Global Issues", F. A. Stowell, D. West and J. G. Howell (Editors), pp. 367-372, New York: Plenum Press.
 
7
Jarczyk, A. P. J., P. Loffler, and F. M, Shipman (1992). Design Rationale for Software Engineering: A Survey. in: "Proceedings of the 25th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences", pp. 577-586.
 
8
Kunz, W. and H. W. J. Rittel ( 1970). Issues as Elements of Information Systems. Working Paper No. 131, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, California.
 
9
Kunz, W. and H. W. J. Rittel (1972). "Die Inforrna-tionswissenschaften". Munchen.
10
 
11
MacLean, A., R. M. Young, V. M. E. Bellotti, and T. P. Moran (1991), Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis. Human-Computer Interaction 6 (3/4), pp. 201-250.
 
12
 
13
Reuter, W. D. and H. Werner (1983). Thesen und Empfehlungen zur Anwendung von Argumentative Informationssystemen. Working Paper A-83-1, Institut fur Grundlagen der Planung, Stuttgart.
 
14
Reuter, W. D. and H. Werner (1984). Zusammen-stellung und Beschreibung von Anwendungsfallen Argumentative Informationssysteme. Working Paper A-84-4, Institut fir Grundlagen der Planung, Stuttgart.
 
15
Reuter, W. D. (1989). "Die Macht der Planer und Architekten". Stuttgart.
 
16
Rittel, H. W. J. and M. M. Webber (1973). Dilemmas in a general Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4, pp. 155-169.
 
17
Rittel, H. W. J. (1988). The Reasoning of Designers. Working Paper A-88-4, Institut fiir Grundlagen der Phmung, Stuttgart.
 
18
 
19
Smolensky, P, B. Fox, R. King, and C. Lewis (1988). Computer-Aided Reasoned Discourse or, How to Ar-gue with a Computer. in: "Cognitive Science and its Applications for Human-Computer Interaction", R. Guindon (Editor), pp. 109-162, HillsdaIe: Erlbaum.
20
 
21
Toulmin, S. (1958), "The Uses of Argument". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Severin Isenmann: colleagues
Wolf D. Reuter: colleagues