A comparison of usability techniques for evaluating design

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

A comparison of usability techniques for evaluating design

Full text

Pdf (980 KB)

Source

Designing Interactive Systems archive
Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques table of contents

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Pages: 101 - 110

Year of Publication: 1997

ISBN:0-89791-863-0

Authors

Ann Doubleday	Centre for HCI Design, School of Informatics, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
Michele Ryan	Centre for HCI Design, School of Informatics, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
Mark Springett	Centre for HCI Design, School of Informatics, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
Alistair Sutcliffe	Centre for HCI Design, School of Informatics, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
IFIP WG 13.2 : IFIP WG 13.2

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 19, Downloads (12 Months): 138, Citation Count: 9

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/263552.263583 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Bates, M. The design of berrypicking techniques for the online Inline Review, pp 407-423, (1989).
	2	Victoria Bellotti, Implications of current design practice for the use of HCI techniques, Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the British Computer Society on People and computers IV, p.13-34, October 1988, Univ. of Manchester, United Kingdom
	3	Bevan, N. INUSE European Usability Support Centres. Telematics Applications Project IE 2016. Information Engineering Usability Support Centres, Principal author: Nigel Bevan of the National Physical Laborato~. Main Editor Dr. J Kirakowski of the Human Factors Research Group, University College, Cork. June 1996.
	4	C. M. Brown, Human-computer interface design guidelines, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1988
	5	Stuart K. Card , Allen Newell , Thomas P. Moran, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1983
	6	Carroll, J. M., Koenemann-Belliveau, J., Rosson, M., and Singley, M. Critical Incidents and Critical Threads in Usability Evaluation in Proc. People and Computers viii, J Alty et al (eds), Cambridge University Press, 279-292, (1993).
	7	Ericcson, K. A. and Simon H. A. Protocol Analysis. MIT Press, (1984).
	8	ISO, International Standards Organisation, Drafi International standard 9241, Ergonomic Requirements for office work with visual display terminals, Part 11, Usability and parts 12-16 on user interface design guidelines, 1S0 or National Standards Organisations, (1995).
	9	Kieras, D. E. and Poison, P. A. An Approach to the Formal Analysis of User Complexity, International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 22, pp 365-395, (1985).
	10	Kirakowski, J. & Corbett, M. SUM I: the Software Measurement Inventory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24,210-212, (1993).
	11	Clayton Lewis , Peter G. Polson , Cathleen Wharton , John Rieman, Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people, p.235-242, April 01-05, 1990, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/97243.97279]
	12	Monk, A., Wright, P., Haber, J., and Davenport L. Improving your human computer interface. Prentice Hall (BCS Practitioner series), (1993).
	13	Ruth C. T. Morris, Toward a user-centered information service, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v.45 n.1, p.20-30, Jan. 1994 [doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<20::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-N]
	14	Nielsen, J. Getting Usability Used. Human Computer Interaction, Interact, '95, pp3- 12. (eds.) K Nordby and P Helmersen, (1995).
	15	Jakob Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1993
	16	Peter G. Polson , Clayton Lewis , John Rieman , Cathleen Wharton, Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.36 n.5, p.741-773, May 1992 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(92)90039-N]
	17	Jenny Preece , Yvonne Rogers , Helen Sharp , David Benyon , Simon Holland , Tom Carey, Human-Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex, UK, 1994
	18	Susannah Ravden , Graham Johnson, Evaluating usability of human-computer interfaces: a practical method, Halsted Press, New York, NY, 1989
	19	Smith, S. L and Mosier, J. Guidelines for Designing User Interface Sof%atre. Mitre Corporation Report MTR-1OO96, Bedford, MA, (1986).
	20	Sutcliffe, A. G., Ryan, M., Springett, M., and Doubleday, A. Model Mismatch Analysis: Towards a Deeper Explanation of Users' Usability Problems. (City University, 1996).
	21	A. G. Sutcliffe , M. V. Springett, From user's problems to design errors: linking evaluation to improving design practice, Proceedings of the conference on People and computers VII, p.117-134, January 1993, York, United Kingdom
	22	Whiteside, J., Bennett, J., and Holzblatt, K. Usability Engineering, our experience and evolutions. in Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, M Helander (cd,) Elsevier North Holland, 791-817, (1988),
	23	Peter Wright , Andrew F. Monk, Evaluation for design, Proceedings of the fifth conference of the British Computer Society, Human-Computer Interaction Specialist Group on People and computers V, p.345-358, February 1990, Univ. of Nottingham
	24	Wright, P., Monk, A,, Carey, T. Co-operative Evaluation. The York Manual, version 0.4, July 1989. P Wright & A Monk, Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO1 5DD.

CITED BY 9

	Kasper Hornbæk , Erik Frøkjær, Comparing usability problems and redesign proposals as input to practical systems development, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA
	Michelle Potts Steves , Emile Morse , Carl Gutwin , Saul Greenberg, A comparison of usage evaluation and inspection methods for assessing groupware usability, Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, September 30-October 03, 2001, Boulder, Colorado, USA
	David M. Hilbert , David F. Redmiles, Extracting usability information from user interface events, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.32 n.4, p.384-421, Dec. 2000
	C. Ardito , M. De Marsico , R. Lanzilotti , S. Levialdi , T. Roselli , V. Rossano , M. Tersigni, Usability of E-learning tools, Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, May 25-28, 2004, Gallipoli, Italy
	Michael Christel , Neema Moraveji, Finding the right shots: assessing usability and performance of a digital video library interface, Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, October 10-16, 2004, New York, NY, USA
	Marilyn Hollinger, A process for incorporating heuristic evaluation into a software release, Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Designing for User eXperience, November 03-05, 2005, San Francisco, California
	Carmelo Ardito , Rosa Lanzilotti , Paolo Buono , Antonio Piccinno, A tool to support usability inspection, Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, May 23-26, 2006, Venezia, Italy
	C. Ardito , M. F. Costabile , A. De Angeli , R. Lanzilotti, Systematic evaluation of e-learning systems: an experimental validation, Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles, p.195-202, October 14-18, 2006, Oslo, Norway
	Ebba Thora Hvannberg , Effie Lai-Chong Law , Marta Kristín Lárusdóttir, Heuristic evaluation: Comparing ways of finding and reporting usability problems, Interacting with Computers, v.19 n.2, p.225-240, March, 2007