ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
How electronic outlining can help you create online materials
Full text PdfPdf (1.37 MB)
Source ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication archive
Proceedings of the 15th annual international conference on Computer documentation table of contents
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Pages: 211 - 221  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-861-4
Author
Jonathan Price  New Mexico Tech, 918 La Senda, NW, Albuquerque, NM
Sponsor
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 6,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/263367.263395
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adelson, N. & Jordan, T. (1992). The need for negotiation in cooperative work. In E. Barrett. (Ed.), Soctomedia: Multimedia, hypermedia, and the social construction of knowledge. 469-492. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
2
Alred, G. J., Oliu, W. E., & Brusaw, C.T. (1992). The professional wrtter: A guide for advanced technical writing. New York: St. Martin's Pess.
 
3
Alvarez. J A. (1980). The elements of technical writing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
 
4
Apple Computer. (1987). Apple human interface guidelines: The Apple desktop interface. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
 
5
Batschelet, M. W. (1988). Plain Style and Scientific Style: The Influence of the Puritan Plain Style Sermon on Early American Science Wnters. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, Vol. 18 (4). 287-295
 
6
Bell, A. H. (1995). Tools for technical and professional communication. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Publishing.
 
7
Bereiter, C, & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychologc of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
 
8
 
9
Brusaw, C. T., Alred. G.J., & Ohu, W.E. (1993). Handbook of technical writing (Fourth Edition). New York: St Martin's Press.
 
10
Charney, D. The effect of hypertext on processes of reading and writing. Selfe& Hilligoss (1994). pp. 238-263
 
11
Costanzo, W. (1994). Reading, Writing, and Thinking in an Age of Electronic Literacy. In Cl L. Selfe, & S. Hilligoss (Eds.). Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology, (pp. 11-21). New York: Modern Language Association.
 
12
Damerst, W. A. (1982). Clear technical reports. New York: HBJ Media Systems.
 
13
Darwin, C. (1889). In F. Darwin (Ed.), The life and letters of Charles Darwin. New York: Appleton.
 
14
deBeaugrande, R., & Dressier, W. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. New York: Longman.
 
15
Dietrich, J. E., & Brooks, K. (1958). Practical speaking for the technical man. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
 
16
Duin. A. H.. & Hansen, C.. Reading and Writing on computer networks as social construction and social interaction. (1994). In C. L. Selfe, & S. Hilligoss (Eds.). Literacy and computers; The complications of teaching and learning with technology, (pp. 89-112). New York: Modern Language Association.
 
17
Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1986). Why write....together: A research update. Rhetoric Review 5.1, 71-81.
 
18
Singular texts/Plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. (1990). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
 
19
Eldred, J. M. (1989). Computers, composition pedagogy, and the social view. In G. E. Hawisher & C. L. Selfe (Eds.) Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction (pp. 201-218). New York: Teachers' College Press.
 
20
Elsbree, L., & Bracher, F. (1967). Heath's college handbook of composition. Boston: D.C.Heath.
 
21
Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Research Report No. 13. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
 
22
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1977). Problem-solving strategies and the writing process. College English, 39,449-461.
 
23
(1980).The dynmnics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In (_kigg (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Writing. ltillsdale: Erlbaum.
 
24
(1981a) A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication,32, 365-387.
 
25
Plans that guide the composing process. (1981 b). In C.H. Frederikscn & J. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: 7he nature, development, and teaching of written communication, Volume 2. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
 
26
(1984). Images, plmls, and prose: . The representation of meaning in writing. Written Communication I, 120-160.
 
27
Flower, L., Schriver, K., Crey, L. Haas, C, & Hayes, J. R. (1992). Planning in writing: The cognition of a constructive process. In S. t). Witte, N. Nakadate, & R. D. Cerry (l-ds.), A rhetoric of doing: Essays on written discourse in honor of james L. Kinneavv (pp. 181-243). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
 
28
Fowler, H. R., Aaron, J.E., & Limburg, K. (1992). The Little Brown handbook. instructor's annotated editon. New York: HarperCollins.
 
29
Hacker, D., & Renshaw, B. (1979). A practical guide for writers. Boston: Little, Brown.
 
30
Hacker, D. (1994). The Bedford handbook for writers. Boston: St Martin's Press.
 
31
 
32
Harwell, G. C. (1960). Technical communication. New York: Macmillan.
 
33
Hawisher, G. E. Research and recommendations for computers and composition. (1989) In G. E. I-Iawisher & C.L. Selfe, (Eds.) Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.
 
34
(1991) Connecting the visual and the verbal. In W. Wrenscla (Ed.), Lessons for the computer age (pp. 129- 132). Urbana: NCTE.
 
35
(1994) Blinding insights: Classification schemes and software for literacy instruction. In C.L. Selfe, & S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. New York: Modem Language Association.
 
36
Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg, & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. HiHsdale: Erlbaum.
 
37
Hays, R. (1965). Principles of technical writing. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison- Wesley.
 
38
Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition.: New directions for teaching Urbana: National Conference on Research on English and ERIC-RCS.
 
39
Horton, W., Taylor, L., Ignacio,A., and N. Hoft, N. (1996). The Web Page Design Cookbook. New York: Wiley.
 
40
 
41
Humphrey, D. (1987). Computers and collaboration: Writing as a social skill. Assembly on Computers in English Newsletter, 3.
 
42
Hutchins, E., HoUan, J., & Norman, D. (1986). Direct manipulation interfaces, in D. Norman, & S.W. Draper (Eds.), User-Centered design: New perspectives on human, computer interaction (pp. 87-124). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
 
43
 
44
Johnson, J. (1992). The Bedford guide to the research process. New York: St Martins Press.
 
45
johnson-Eilola, J. (1994). Reading and writing in hypertext: Vertigo and euphoria, in C.L. Selfe, & S. Hilligoss (Eels.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology (pp. I95-219). New York: Modem Language Association.
 
46
Jordan, J E. (1965). Using rhetoric. New York, Harper & Row.
 
47
Kaufer, D. S., Fleming, D., Werner, M., & Sinsheimer-Wee-ks, A. (1993). Collaborative argument across the visual-verbal interface. Technical Communication Quarterly, 2.1, 37- 49.
 
48
Kaufer, D.S. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1986). Composing written sentences. Research in the Teaching of EngUsh, 20, 121- 140.
 
49
Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, no. 2: 355-365.
 
50
Kostelnick, C. (1989a). Process paradigms in design and composition: Mfimties and directions. College Composition and Communication, 40, 267-281.
 
51
(1989b) Visual rhetoric: A readeroriented approach to graphics and designs. The Technical Writing Teacher 16, 77-88.
 
52
Kuhlthau, C.C. (1988). Longitudinal case studies of the information search process of users in libraries. Library & Information Science Research, 10, 257-304.
 
53
Leggett, G., Mead, C.D., & Kramer, M.G. (1991). Prentice Hall handbook for writers (Eleventh Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
 
54
Lester, J. D. (1990). Writing research papers, A complete guide. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.
 
55
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press.
 
56
 
57
Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale: Erlbam'n.
 
58
Marckwardt, A. H., & Cassidy, F. G. (1960). Scribner handbook of English ( Third Edition). New York: Charles Scribner's.
 
59
Markel, M. H. (1984) Technical writing: ..... and strategies New York St. Martin's Press.
 
60
Martin. H. C. (1957). The logic and the... of exposition. New York: Rinehart.
 
61
McCarthy, L. P. (1985). A Stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. University Microfilms No. 8515414.
 
62
Mille. G. A. (1956). The Magical number seven. plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
 
63
Mills. G. H., & Walter, J. A. (1962). Technical writing. New York: Holt, Rinchart, and Winston.
 
64
Mischel, T. (1974). A case study of a twelfth grade writer. Research in the Teaching of English, 8, 303-314.
 
65
Moberg, G. (1986). Writing on computers in English composition. New York: Writing Consultant.
 
66
Nelson, J. (1992). Constructing a research paper: A study of students goals and approaches. (Tech Report No. 59). Berkeley, CA: University of California. Center for the Study of Writing
 
67
Perl, S. (1979). The composing processes of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.
 
68
Pranko, S. H. (1979). A description of the composing processes of college freshman writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 5-22
 
69
Plumb, C. (1990). What can technical writers learn from good conversation? Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 202. 201-209.
 
70
Ramus, P. (1574). Dialecticae.
 
71
Rodrigues, D., & Rodrigues. R. (1986) Teaching writing with a word processor. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
 
72
Rubens, P. (Ed.). (1992). Science and Technical writing: A manual of style. New York: Henry Holt.
 
73
Santmyers, S. S. (1949). Practical report writing. Scranton. Pennsylvania: International Textbook Company.
 
74
Schank. R.. & Abelson. R. (1977). Scripts, plans. goals and understanding Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
 
75
Schwartz. H. (1985). Interactive writing: Composing with a word processor. New York: Holt.
 
76
Selte. C. L., & Hilligoss, S.(Eds.). (1994). Literacy and computers: The complications of reaching and learning with technology. Research and Scholarship in Composition Series. New York. Modern Language Association.
 
77
Shelton. J. H. (1995). handbook for technical writing Lincolnwood IL: NTC Business Boods.
 
78
Sherman, T. A. (1955). Modern technical writing, New York: Prentice-Hall.
 
79
(1966). Modern technical writing (Second Edition). Englewood Cliffs. N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
 
80
Shneiderman. B. (1983) Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer, 16, 57-69.
 
81
 
82
Smart, W. K., & Lang, D R. (1943).Smart's handbook of effective writing, New York, Harper & Brothers.
 
83
Sommers, N. & McQuade, D. (1984). Student writers at work: The Bedford prizes. New York: St. Martin's.
 
84
Slallard, C. (1974). An analysis of the behavior of good student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 8 206-218.
 
85
Stem. V. (1990). Exploring the cognition of reading-to-write. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, M. J. Kantz, K. McCormick, & W.C. Peck (Eds.). Reading-to-write: Exploring a cognitive and social process (pp. 119-1430. New York: Oxford.
 
86
Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middlegrade students comprehenston and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, no. 2, 134-136.
 
87
Thomas, J. D. (1949). Composition for technical students. New York: Scribner's.
 
88
van Drjk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension New York: Academic.
 
89
Walvoord, B. E., Anderson, V. J., Breihan. J. r., McCarthy, L. P., Robison, S.M., & Sherman, A. K. (1995). Functions of outlining among college students in four disciplines. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 390-421.
 
90
Warriner, J. E. Mersand, J., & and Frances Griffith, F. (1958). English grammar and composition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
 
91
Warriner. J. (1950). English grammar and composition: Complete course. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
 
92
Weisman, H. M. (1962). Basic technical writing. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Books.
 
93
Weiss, E. H. (1982). The writing system for engineers and scientists. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
 
94
Wellborn, G.P, Green, L.B., & Nail, K.A. (1961). Technical writing. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
 
95
Wicker, C.V., & Albrecht, W.P. (1960). The American technical writer: A handbook of objective writing. New York: American Book.
 
96
Wilcox, R. P. (1977). Communication at work: Writing and speaking. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
97