Progress on Room 5

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Progress on Room 5: a testbed for public interactive semi-formal legal argumentation

Full text

Pdf (901 KB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

Melbourne, Australia

Pages: 207 - 214

Year of Publication: 1997

ISBN:0-89791-924-6

Authors

Ronald P. Loui	Department of Computer Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Jeff Norman	Department of Computer Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Joe Altepeter	Department of Computer Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Dan Pinkard	Department of Computer Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Dan Craven	Department of Computer Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Jessica Linsday	Department of Computer Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Mark Foltz	Department of Computer Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO

Sponsors

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
University of Melbourne : University of Melbourne

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 19, Citation Count: 17

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/261618.261655 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Vincent Aleven , Kevin D. Ashley, Doing things with factors, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.31-41, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222106]
	2	Alexy, R. A Theory of Legal Argumentation, Clarendon. 1989.
	3	Allen, L. Wff'n'Proof, Autotelic Instructional Materials, New Haven. 1966.
	4	Bench-Capon, T. et al. "Interacting with knowledge-based systems through dialogue games," Prec. Expert Systems and Their Applications, 1991.
	5	Cavalli-Sforza, V. and D. Suthers. "Belvedere: an environment for practicing scientific argumentation," Prec. AA~i Workshop on Computational Dialectics, 1994.
	6	Jeff Coklin , Michael L. Begeman, gIBIS: a tool for all reasons, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v.40 n.3, p.200-213, May 1989 [doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198905)40:3<200::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-U]
	7	Freeman, K. and A. Farley. "A model of argumentation and its application to legal reasoning," forthcoming in AI and Law.
	8	G. Fischer , R. McCall , A. Morch, Design environments for constructive and argumentative design, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Wings for the mind, p.269-275, March 1989
	9	Gordon, T. "The pleadings game," Prec. ICAIL, 1993.
	10	Gordon, T. and N. Karacapilidis. "The ZENO argumentation framework," working paper on the WWW.
	11	Hage, J. and B. Verheij. "Reason-based logic," Prec. A,4AI Workshop on Computational Dialectics, 1994.
	12	Lee, J. Sibyl: a tool for managing group decisions," working paper, Sloan School of Management, 1990.
	13	Arno R. Lodder , Aimée Herczog, DiaLaw: a dialogical framework for modeling legal reasoning, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.146-155, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222225]
	14	Loui, R. "Process and Policy," to appear in Computational Intelligence, 1998.
	15	Loui, R. and W. Chen. "An argument game," technical report, Washington University Computer Science Dept., TR92-47, 1991.
	16	Ronald P. Loui , Jeff Norman , Jon Olson , Andrew Merrill, A design for reasoning with policies, precedents, and rationales, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.202-211, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.159002]
	17	Catherine C. Marshall , Frank G. Halasz , Russell A. Rogers , William C. Janssen, Jr., Aquanet: a hypertext tool to hold your knowledge in place, Proceedings of the third annual ACM conference on Hypertext, p.261-275, December 15-18, 1991, San Antonio, Texas, United States [doi>10.1145/122974.123000]
	18	Katsumi Nitta , Stephen Wong , Yoshihisa Ohtake, A computational model for trial reasoning, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.20-29, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158979]
	19	Henry Prakken , Giovanni Sartor, On the relation between legal language and legal argument: assumptions, applicability and dynamic priorities, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.1-10, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222096]
	20	Rittel, H. and M. Webber. "Dilemmas in a general theory of planning," Policy Sciences 4, 1973.
	21	Uri J. Schild , Shai Herzog, The use of meta-rules in rule based legal computer systems, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.100-109, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158989]
	22	Guillermo R. Simari , Ronald P. Loui, A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation, Artificial Intelligence, v.53 n.2-3, p.125-157, Feb. 1992 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-A]
	23	David B. Skalak , Edwin L. Rissland, Argument moves in a rule-guided domain, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.1-11, May 1991, Oxford, England [doi>10.1145/112646.112647]
	24	Toulmin, S. Uses of Argument, Cambridge, 1958.
	25	Jon December , Neil Randall, World Wide Web Unleashed, Sams, Indianapolis, IN, 1995
	26	Hajime Yoshino, The systematization of legal meta-inference, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.266-275, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222257]

CITED BY 17

	Carlos Iván Chesñevar , Ana Gabriela Maguitman , Ronald Prescott Loui, Logical models of argument, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.32 n.4, p.337-383, Dec. 2000
	Marius J. A. Duker , Arno R. Lodder, Sentencing and information management: consistency and the particularities of a case, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.100-107, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway
	Bart Verheij, Automated argument assistance for lawyers, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.43-52, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway
	Henry Prakken, Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.119-128, May 2001, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
	Bart Verheij, Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation, Artificial Intelligence, v.150 n.1-2, p.291-324, November 2003
	Henry Prakken , Chris Reed , Douglas Walton, Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 24-28, 2003, Scotland, United Kingdom
	B. Moulin , H. Irandoust , M. Bélanger , G. Desbordes, Explanation and Argumentation Capabilities: Towards the Creation of More Persuasive Agents, Artificial Intelligence Review, v.17 n.3, p.169-222, May 2002
	John L. Yearwood , Andrew Stranieri, The generic/actual argument model of practical reasoning, Decision Support Systems, v.41 n.2, p.358-379, January 2006
	Floris Bex , Henry Prakken , Chris Reed , Douglas Walton, Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.11 n.2-3, p.125-165, January 2003
	Anthony Hunter, Hybrid argumentation systems for structured news reports, The Knowledge Engineering Review, v.16 n.4, p.295-329, December 2001
	Andrew Stranieri , John Zeleznikow , John Yearwood, Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning, The Knowledge Engineering Review, v.16 n.4, p.331-348, December 2001
	Jeroen Keppens , Qiang Shen , Burkhard Schafer, Probabilistic abductive computation of evidence collection strategies in crime investigation, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 06-11, 2005, Bologna, Italy
	Marc Lauritsen, Intelligent tools for managing factual arguments, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 06-11, 2005, Bologna, Italy
	Carlos Iván Chesñevar , Ana Gabriela Maguitman , Guillermo Ricardo Simari, Argument-based critics and recommenders: a qualitative perspective on user support systems, Data & Knowledge Engineering, v.59 n.2, p.293-319, November 2006
	Carlos Chesñevar , Jarred McGinnis , Sanjay Modgil , Iyad Rahwan , Chris Reed , Guillermo Simari , Matthew South , Gerard Vreeswijk , Steven Willmott, Towards an argument interchange format, The Knowledge Engineering Review, v.21 n.4, p.293-316, December 2006
	Alejandro J. García , Guillermo R. Simari, Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, v.4 n.2, p.95-138, January 2004
	Maaike Schweers , Bart Verheij, Beyond boxes and arrows: argumentation support in terms of the knowledge structure of a legal topic, Proceeding of the 2007 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference, p.109-118, June 15, 2007