ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Legal merit arguments, legal semiotics and the design of legal knowledge-based systems
Full text PdfPdf (1.14 MB)
Source International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents
Melbourne, Australia
Pages: 198 - 206  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-924-6
Author
James Palmer  Balliol College, Oxford University
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
University of Melbourne : University of Melbourne
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 20,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/261618.261653
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Balkin, J.M. (1986) The Crystalline Structure of Legal Thought, 39 Rutgers L. Rev. 1.
 
3
Balkin, J.M. (1996) A Night in the Topics: The Reason of Legal Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Legal Reason, in Law's Stories 211, 216 (Peter Brooks & Paul Gewirtz eds.).
 
4
Bell. J. (1983) Policy Arguments in Judicial Decisions.
 
5
Bell, J. (1995) Policy Arguments and Legal Reasoning, in Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning 73-97 (Zenon Bankowski, Ian White and Ulrike Hahn eds.).
6
7
 
8
oyle, J. (1985) TheAnatomy of a Torts Class, 34 Am. U. L. Rev. 1003.
 
9
Dworkin, tL (1977) Taking Rights Seriously.
 
10
Freeman K. and Farley A.M. (1996) A Model of Argumentation and its Application to Legal Reasoning. 4 Artificial Intelligence and Law 157.
 
11
Gordon. T.F. (1995) The Pleadings Game.
12
 
13
Hage, J. (1996) A Theory of Legal Reasoning and a Logic to Match, 4 Artificial Intelligence and Law 199.
 
14
Hart, H.L.A. (1994) The Concept of Law (Raz and Bulloch eds., Clarendon Press, 2d ed.).
 
15
Hawkes, T. (1977) Stmcturalism and Semiotics.
 
16
Hutchinson, A.C. (1995)A Postmodern's Hart: Taking Rules Skeptically, 58 Modern L.R. 788.
 
17
Kennedy, D. (1983) Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy: A Polemic Against the System.
 
18
Kennedy, D. (1991) A Semiotics of Legal Argument, 42 Syracuse L. Rev. 75, 104.
 
19
Levi, E.H. (1949) An Introduction to Legal Reasoning.
 
20
Llewellyn, K.N. (1950) Remarks on the Theory of Appellate Decision and the Rules or Canons About How Statutes Are to Be Construed 3 Vanderbilt L.R. 395.
21
 
22
Lopez, G.P. (1984) LayLawyering 32 UCLA L. Rev. 1.
23
 
24
MacCormick, N. (1978) Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory.
 
25
Perelman C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969) The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (John Wilkinson & Purcell Weaver trans.).
26
 
27
Prakken H. and Sartor G. (1996) A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning, 4 Artificial Intelligence and Law 331.
 
28
Propp, V. (1968) Morphology of the Folktale (Laurence Scott trans., 2d ed. revised and edited by Louis A. Wagner).
 
29
Rissland E.L., Skalak D.B. and Friedman M.T. (1996) BankXT(.' Supporting Legal Arguments through Heuristic Retrieval, 4 Artificial Intelligence and Law 1.
30
 
31
Schank, R.C. (1990) Tell Me a Story.
 
32
Singer, J.W. (1989) Persuasion 87 Mich. L. Rev. 2442.
 
33
}Skalak D.B. and Rissland E.L. (1992) Arguments and Cases: An Inevitable Interheining, 1 Artificial Intelligence and Law 3.
 
34
Summers, R. (1978), Two Types of Substantive Reasons: The Core of a Theory of Common Law Justification, 63 Comell L. Rev. 707.
 
35
Summers IL, and Afiyah, P.S. (1987) Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law.
 
36
Sunstein, C. (1993) On Analogical Reasoning, 106 Harv. L. Rev. 741.
 
37
 
38
Toulmin, S.E. (1958), Uses of Argument.
 
39
Viehweg, T. (1993) Topics and Law (W. Cole Durham trans.).
 
40
Waldron, J. (1994) Vagueness in Law and Language: Some Philosophical Issues, 82 Cal. L. Rev. 509.