ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On modeling creativity in legal reasoning
Full text PdfPdf (1.23 MB)
Source International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents
Melbourne, Australia
Pages: 180 - 189  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-924-6
Author
Bipin Indurkhya  Department of Computer Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Nakacho, Koganei, Tokyo 184, Japan
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
University of Melbourne : University of Melbourne
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 10,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/261618.261651
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Bench-Capon, T.J.M., and Coenen, F.P. (1992). Isomorphism and Legal Knowledge Based Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1, pp. 65-86.
 
3
Branting, L.K. (1993). A Computational Model of Ratio Decidendi. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2, pp. 1-32.
4
 
5
Hage, J. (1996). A Theory of Legal Reasoning and a Logic to Match. Artificial intelligence and Law d, PP- 199-273.
 
6
Hamfelt, A. (1996). Formalizing Multiple Interpretation of Legal Knowledge. Artificial Intelligence and Lato 3, pp. 221-265.
 
7
 
8
Indurkhya, B. (1992). Metaphor and Cognition: An interactionist Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
 
9
Indurkhya, B. (1997). Metaphor as Change of Representation: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective. Journal of E~erimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 9, pp. 1-36.
 
10
11
 
12
 
13
Rissland, E.L., Skalak, D.B., and Pdedman, M.T. (1996). BankXX: Supporting Legal Arguments through Heuristic Retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law ,~, pp. 1-71.
 
14
Routen, T. (1996). On Isomorphic Formalizations. Artificial Intelligence and Law d, PP. 113-132.
15
 
16
Twining, W., and Miers, D. (1982). How To Do Things With Rules: A Primer of Interpretation. (2nd ed.), Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.