| On modeling creativity in legal reasoning |
| Full text |
Pdf
(1.23 MB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
archive
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
table of contents
Melbourne, Australia
Pages: 180 - 189
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-924-6
|
|
Author
|
|
Bipin Indurkhya
|
Department of Computer Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Nakacho, Koganei, Tokyo 184, Japan
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 10, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Bench-Capon, T.J.M., and Coenen, F.P. (1992). Isomorphism and Legal Knowledge Based Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1, pp. 65-86.
|
| |
3
|
Branting, L.K. (1993). A Computational Model of Ratio Decidendi. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2, pp. 1-32.
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Hage, J. (1996). A Theory of Legal Reasoning and a Logic to Match. Artificial intelligence and Law d, PP- 199-273.
|
| |
6
|
Hamfelt, A. (1996). Formalizing Multiple Interpretation of Legal Knowledge. Artificial Intelligence and Lato 3, pp. 221-265.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Indurkhya, B. (1992). Metaphor and Cognition: An interactionist Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
|
| |
9
|
Indurkhya, B. (1997). Metaphor as Change of Representation: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective. Journal of E~erimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 9, pp. 1-36.
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
Daniel Poulin , Paul Bratley , Jacques Frémont , Ejan Mackaay, Legal interpretation in expert systems, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.90-99, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
[doi> 10.1145/158976.158988]
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Rissland, E.L., Skalak, D.B., and Pdedman, M.T. (1996). BankXX: Supporting Legal Arguments through Heuristic Retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law ,~, pp. 1-71.
|
| |
14
|
Routen, T. (1996). On Isomorphic Formalizations. Artificial Intelligence and Law d, PP. 113-132.
|
 |
15
|
Pierre St-Vincent , Daniel Poulin , Paul Bratley, A computational framework for dialectical reasoning, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.137-145, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States
[doi> 10.1145/222092.222224]
|
| |
16
|
Twining, W., and Miers, D. (1982). How To Do Things With Rules: A Primer of Interpretation. (2nd ed.), Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.
|
|