Automated drafting of self-explaining documents

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Automated drafting of self-explaining documents

Full text

Pdf (1.38 MB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

Melbourne, Australia

Pages: 72 - 81

Year of Publication: 1997

ISBN:0-89791-924-6

Authors

L. Karl Branting	Department of Computer Science, University of Wyoming, Box 3682, Laramie, WY
James C. Lester	Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Box 8206, Raleigh, NC
Charles B. Callaway	Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Box 8206, Raleigh, NC

Sponsors

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
University of Melbourne : University of Melbourne

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 14, Citation Count: 6

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/261618.261635 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	All87	James Allen, Natural language understanding, Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1988
	Aus62	J. Austin. How to do things with words. Oxford U. Press, New York, 1962.
	BCS95	T. J. M. Bench-Capon , G. Staniford, PLAID: proactive legal assistance, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.81-88, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222142]
	BL96a	L.K. Branting and J. C. Lester. A framework for self-explaining legal documents. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Legal Knowledge-Based Systems (JURIX-96), pages 77-90, Tilburg University, the Netherlands, December 1996.
	BL96b	Karl Branting , James C. Lester, Justification Structures for Document Reuse, Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, p.76-90, November 14-16, 1996
	BLC97	L. Branting, J. Lester, and C. Callaway. Automating judicial document drafting: A unification-based approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1997. To appear.
	Bra93	L. Karl Branting, An issue-oriented approach to judicial document assembly, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.228-235, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.159005]
	Caw92	Alison Cawsey, Explanation and interaction: the computer generation of explanatory dialogues, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993
	DHW95	Chrysanne DiMarco, Graeme Hirst, and Leo Wanner. HealthDoc: Customizing patient information and health education by medical condition and personal characteristics. In Working Notes of the Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education, 1995.
	DS95	Aspassia Daskalopulu , Marek Sergot, A constraint-driven system for contract assembly, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.62-70, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222130]
	Elh91	M. Elhadad. FUF: The universal unifier user manual version 5.0. Technical Report CUCS-038- 91, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, 1991.
	Gor89	T. Gordon. A theory construction approach to legal document assembly. In Pre-Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Logic, Informatics, and Law, pages 485-498, Florence, 1989.
	Gri75	H. Grice. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan, editors, Syntax and Semantics 2: Speech Acts, pages 41-58. Academic Press, New York, N.Y., 1975.
	GS86	Barbara J. Grosz , Candace L. Sidner, Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse, Computational Linguistics, v.12 n.3, p.175-204, July-September 1986
	Hob79	J. Hobbs. Coherence and co-reference. Cognitive Science, 3(1):67-82, 1979.
	Hov93	Eduard H. Hovy, Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations, Artificial Intelligence, v.63 n.1-2, p.341-385, Oct. 1993 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(93)90021-3]
	Joh94	W. Lewis Johnson. Dynamic (re)generation of software documentation, in Proceedings of the Fourth Systems Reengineering Technology Workshop, pages 57-66, 1994.
	KKR91	R. Kittredge, T. Korelsky, and O. Rambow. On the need for domain communication knowledge. Computational Intelligence, 7(4):305-314, 1991.
	KMR93	T. Korelsky, D. McCullough, and O. Raxnbow. Knowledge requirements for the automatic generation of porject management reports. In Proceedings of the Eigth Knowledge-Engineering Conference. IEEE Computer Society Press, September 20-23 1993.
	Lau92	M. Lauritsen. Technology report: Building legal practice systems with today's commericial authoring tools. Law and Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 1992.
	Lau93	Marc Lauritsen, Knowing documents, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.184-191, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.159000]
	LP97	James C. Lester , Bruce W. Porter, Developing and empirically evaluating robust explanation generators: the KNIGHT experiments, Computational Linguistics, v.23 n.1, p.65-101, March 1997
	Mar89	C. C. Marshall, Representing the structure of a legal argument, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.121-127, May 1989, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/74014.74031]
	McK85	Kathleen R. McKeown, Text generation: using discourse strategies and focus constraints to generate natural language text, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1985
	Moo95	Johanna D. Moore, Participating in explanatory dialogues: interpreting and responding to questions in context, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994
	MRK95	Kathleen McKeown , Jacques Robin , Karen Kukich, Generating concise natural language summaries, Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, v.31 n.5, p.703-733, Sept. 1995 [doi>10.1016/0306-4573(95)00026-D]
	Par88	Cécile L. Paris, Tailoring object descriptions to a user's level of expertise, Computational Linguistics, v.14 n.3, September 1988
	Sea69	J. Searle. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1969.
	Tou58	S.E. Toulmin. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, 1958.
	ZS95	John Zeleznikow , Andrew Stranieri, The split-up system: integrating neural networks and rule-based reasoning in the legal domain, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.185-194, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222235]

CITED BY 6

	L. Karl Branting , Charles B. Callaway , Bradford W. Mott , James C. Lester, Integrating discourse and domain knowledge for document drafting, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.214-220, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway
	John Yearwood , Andrew Stranieri, The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.117-125, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway
	L. Karl Branting, A reduction-graph model of precedent in legal analysis, Artificial Intelligence, v.150 n.1-2, p.59-95, November 2003
	Carlo Biagioli , Enrico Francesconi, A Semantics-based Visual Framework for Planning a New Bill, Proceeding of the 2005 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2005: The Eighteenth Annual Conference, p.103-104, May 15, 2005
	Carole D. Hafner , Marc Lauritsen, Extending the power of automated legal drafting technology, Proceeding of the 2007 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference, p.59-68, June 15, 2007
	Marc Lauritsen , Thomas F. Gordon, Toward a general theory of document modeling, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, June 08-12, 2009, Barcelona, Spain