Automatic generation of amendment legislation

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Automatic generation of amendment legislation

Full text

Pdf (1.00 MB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

Melbourne, Australia

Pages: 56 - 62

Year of Publication: 1997

ISBN:0-89791-924-6

Author

Timothy Arnold-Moore

Multimedia Database Systems, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology

Sponsors

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
University of Melbourne : University of Melbourne

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 24, Citation Count: 5

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/261618.261631 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	J. F. Allen and C. R. Perrault. Analyzing intentions in dialogues. Technical Report CST Tit 150, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 1979.
	2	Timothy Arnold-Moore, Automatically processing amendments to legislation, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.297-306, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222264]
	3	K. Branting. A computational model of ratio decidendi. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2:1-32, 1993.
	4	it. L. Chartrand and J. Bortrand. An overview of state legislative information processing. In Eres {7}.
	5	A. Clark and K. Economides. Technics and praxis: Technological innovation and legal practice in modem society. Yearbook of Law Computers and Technology, 4:16, 1989.
	6	Aspassia Daskalopulu , Marek Sergot, A constraint-driven system for contract assembly, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.62-70, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222130]
	7	Beth Krevitt Eres, Legal and Legislative Information Processing, Greenwood Publishing Group Inc., Westport, CT, 1980
	8	T. Gordon. A theory construction approach to document assembly. In Antonio A. Martino and Fiorenza Socci Natali, editors, Automatic Analysis of legal texts: Logic, Informatics, Law, pages 485-489, Florence, 1989. North-Holland. Papers from the 3rd International Conference on Logic, Informatics and Law.
	9	G. Greenleaf, A. Mowbray, and P. van Dijk. Representing and using legal knowledge in integrated decision support systems: DataLex workstations. Aritificial InteUigence and Law, 3:97-142, 1995.
	10	Mary Dee Harris, Introduction to natural language processing, Reston Publishing Co., Reston, VA, 1985
	11	P. Hayes. Mapping input into schema. Technical Report CST TR 6068, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 1978.
	12	Helmut Horacek , Michael Zock, New Concepts in Natural Language Generation: Planning, Realization and Systems, St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1993
	13	Eduard H. Hovy, Generating Natural Language under Pragmatic Constraints, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1988
	14	Eduard H. Hovy, Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations, Natural language processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994
	15	International Organization for Standardization. Information processing - text and office systems- Standard Generalised Markup Language (SGML), 1986. ISO/IEC 8879:1986.
	16	J. A. Banks Jr. A comprehensive computer-assisted legislative program: Virginia. In Eres {7}.
	17	M. Lauritsen. Technology report: Building legal practice systems with today's commercial authoring tools. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1:87-102, 1992.
	18	W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson. Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text structures. In G. Kempen, editor, Natural Language Generation, pages 279-300. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Boston, 1986.
	19	Kathleen Rose Mckeown, Generating natural language text in response to questions about database structure, 1982
	20	K. IL McKeown. Text Generatior~ Cambridge Uni Press, Cambridge, 2nd edition, 1985.
	21	K. IL McKeown and William tL Swartout. Language generation and explanation. In Zock and Sabah {32}, pages 1-51.
	22	C. Me/lish. Natural language generation from plans. In Zock and Sabah {32}, pages 130-145.
	23	M. Minsky. A framework for representing knowledge. In Patrick Henry Winston and Berthold Klaus Paul Horn, editors, The Psychology of Gomputer Vision, pages 211-277. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
	24	D. C. Pearce. Statutory Interpretation in Australia. Butterworths, Sydney, 2nd edition, 1981.
	25	The preparation of legislation. Cmnd 6053, May 1975.
	26	1~. Sacks-Davis, T. Arnold-Moore, and A. Kent. A standards-based approach to combining information retrieval and database functionality. International Jour. hal of Information Technology, 1(1):1-15, 1995.
	27	R. Schank and R. Abelson. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ, 1977.
	28	N. Sinomin. An approach for creating structured text. In Zock and Sabah {32}, pages 146-160.
	29	R. L. Stoyles. The unfulfilled promise: Use of computers by and for legislatures. Computer/Law Journal, 9:73, 1987.
	30	C. F. H. Tapper. Computers and legislation. Alabama Law Review, 23(1):1-42, Fall 1970.
	31	E. Wilson. A hypertext interface for automated document drafting. Law Technology Journal, 1(1), October 1991. Electronic journal available from gopher://gopher. 1 aw. waxwick, ac. uk/i 1/ltc / publications/LTJ.
	32	M. Zock and G. Sabah, editors. Advances in natural language generation: an interdisciplinary perspective. Pinter Publishers, London; Norwood, NJ, 1988.

CITED BY 5

	Timothy Arnold-Moore , Philip Anderson , Ron Sacks-Davis, Managing a digital library of legislation, Proceedings of the second ACM international conference on Digital libraries, p.175-183, July 23-26, 1997, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
	Raffaella Brighi , Leonardo Lesmo , Alessandro Mazzei , Monica Palmirani , Daniele P. Radicioni, Towards Semantic Interpretation of Legal Modifications through Deep Syntactic Analysis, Proceeding of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference, p.202-206, July 08, 2008
	Alessandro Mazzei , Daniele P. Radicioni , Raffaella Brighi, NLP-based extraction of modificatory provisions semantics, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, June 08-12, 2009, Barcelona, Spain
	Leonardo Lesmo , Alessandro Mazzei , Daniele P. Radicioni, Extracting semantic annotations from legal texts, Proceedings of the 20th ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, June 29-July 01, 2009, Torino, Italy
	PierLuigi Spinosa , Gerardo Giardiello , Manola Cherubini , Simone Marchi , Giulia Venturi , Simonetta Montemagni, NLP-based metadata extraction for legal text consolidation, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, June 08-12, 2009, Barcelona, Spain