Reasoning with precedents in a dialogue game

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Reasoning with precedents in a dialogue game

Full text

Pdf (1.29 MB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

Melbourne, Australia

Pages: 1 - 9

Year of Publication: 1997

ISBN:0-89791-924-6

Authors

Henry Prakken	Hoptille 46, 1102 PN Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Giovanni Sartor	The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland., IDG-CNR, Florence, Italy

Sponsors

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
University of Melbourne : University of Melbourne

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 15, Citation Count: 4

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/261618.261621 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	Aleven & Ashley, 1996	Vincent Aleven , Kevin D. Ashley, How Different Is Different? Arguing About the Significance of Similarities and Differences, Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, p.1-15, November 14-16, 1996
	Ashley, 1990	Kevin D. Ashley, Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991
	Branting, 1991	L. Karl Branting, Reasoning with portions of precedents, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.145-154, May 1991, Oxford, England [doi>10.1145/112646.112664]
	Branting, 1994	L.K. Branting, A computational model of ratio decidendi. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (1994), 1-31.
	Dung, 1995	Phan Minh Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, v.77 n.2, p.321-357, Sept. 1995 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X]
	Gordon, 1995	Thomas F. Gordon, Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 1995
	Hage, 1996	J.C. Hage, A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to match. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4: 199-273.
	Loui et. al., 1993	Ronald P. Loui , Jeff Norman , Jon Olson , Andrew Merrill, A design for reasoning with policies, precedents, and rationales, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.202-211, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.159002]
	Loui & Norman, 1995	R.P. Loui & J. Norman, Rationales and argument moves. Artificial Intelligence and Law 3: 159-189.
	Prakken & Sartor, 1996a	Henry Prakken , Giovanni Sartor, A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities, Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning, p.510-524, June 03-07, 1996
	Prakken & Sartor, 1996b	H. Prakken & G. Sartor, A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4: 331-368.
	Prakken & Sartor, 1997a	H. Prakken & G. Sartor, Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics 7: 25-75.
	Prakken & Sartor, 1997b	H. Prakken & G. Sartor, Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Submitted.
	Skalak & Rissland, 1992	D.B. Skalak & E.L. Rissland, Arguments and Cases. An Inevitable Intertwining. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1: 3-44.
	Vreeswijk, 1996	G.A.W. Vreeswijk, Representation of formal dispute with a standing order. Research Report MA- TRIX, University of Limburg.

CITED BY 4

	John Yearwood , Andrew Stranieri, The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.117-125, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway
	T. J. M. Bench-Capon, Some observations on modelling case based reasoning with formal argument models, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.36-42, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway
	Bart Verheij, About the logical relations between cases and rules, Proceeding of the 2008 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2008: The Twenty-First Annual Conference, p.21-32, July 08, 2008
	Jenny Eriksson Lundström , Jørgen Fischer Nilsson , Andreas Hamfelt, Legal rules and argumentation in a metalogic framework, Proceeding of the 2007 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference, p.39-48, June 15, 2007