ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Does continuous visual feedback aid debugging in direct-manipulation programming systems?
Full text PdfPdf (1.15 MB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Pages: 258 - 265  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-802-9
Authors
E. M. Wilcox  Dept. of Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR and Timberline Software, 9600 S.W. Nimbus Ave., Beaverton, OR
J. W. Atwood  Dept. of Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
M. M. Burnett  Dept. of Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
J. J. Cadiz  Dept. of Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
C. R. Cook  Dept. of Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 20,   Citation Count: 15
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/258549.258721
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Burnett, M. and Ambler, A. Interactive Visual Data Abstraction in a Declarative Visual Programming Language. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 5(1), Mar. 1994, 29-60.
 
4
 
5
Eisenstadt, M. Why HyperTalk Debugging Is More ainful Than It Ought To Be. HCI'93 Conference, pub. as People and Computers VIII, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993, 443-462.
 
6
Eisenstadt, M. Tales of Debugging from the Front Lines. Proc. Empirical Studies of Programmers, Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ, 1993, 86-112.
 
7
Gilmore, D. Interface Design: Have We Got It Wrong? INTERACT '95, (K. Nordby, D. Gilmore, and S. Arnesen, eds.), Chapman & Hall, London, England, 1995.
 
8
Green, T. and Petre, M. Usability Analysis of Visual Programming Environments' A 'Cognitive Dimensions' Framework. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7(2), Jun. 1996, 131-174.
 
9
 
10
Lawrence, A., Badre, A. and Stasko, J. Empirically Evaluating the Use of Animations to Teach Algorithms. 1994 IEEE Syrup. Visual Languages, St. Louis, MO, Oct. 4-7, 1994, 48-54.
 
11
Martin, G. and Corl, K. System Response Time Effects on User Productivity. Behaviour and Information Technology 5(1 ), 1986, 3-13.
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
Tanimoto, S. VIVA: A Visual Language for Image Processing. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 2(2), Jun. 1990, 127-139.
 
19
Whitley, K. Visual Programming Languages and the Empirical Evidence For and Against. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 1997 (to appear).
 
20
Wilcox, E., Atwood, J., Burnett, M., Cadiz, J., and Cook, C. Does Continuous Visual Feedback Aid Debugging in Direct-Manipulation Programming Systems? An Empirical Study. TR 96-60-9, Oregon State University, Dept. of Computer Science, (303 Dearborn, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA), Aug. 1996.

CITED BY  15

Collaborative Colleagues:
E. M. Wilcox: colleagues
J. W. Atwood: colleagues
M. M. Burnett: colleagues
J. J. Cadiz: colleagues
C. R. Cook: colleagues