ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Architectural and physical design challenges for one-million gate FPGAs and beyond
Full text PdfPdf (621 KB)
Source International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays archive
Proceedings of the 1997 ACM fifth international symposium on Field-programmable gate arrays table of contents
Monterey, California, United States
Pages 129-132  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-89791-801-0
Authors
Jonathan Rose  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto
Dwight Hill  Synopsys, Inc.
Sponsor
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/258305.258324
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Process technology advances tell us that the one-million gate Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) will soon be here, and larger devices shortly after that. We feel that current architectures will not estend directly to this scale because: they do not handle routing delays effectively; they require excessive compile/place/route times; and because they do not exploit new opportunities are presented by the increase in available transistors and wiring. In this paper we describe several challenges that will need to be solved for these large-scale FPGAs to realize their full potential.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Altera 1995 Data Book, Altera Corporation,
 
4
Altera Corporation, Data sheet, Flex l OK Embedded Programmable Logic Family, July 1995.
 
5
H. Hsieh, W. Carter, J. Ja, E. Cheung, S. Schreifels, C. Efickson, P. Freidin, L. Tinkey and R. Kanazawa, "Third-Generation Architecture Boosts Speed and Density of Field-Programmable Gate Arrays" Proc. 1990 CICC, May 1990, pp. 31.2.1 - 31.2.7.
6
 
7
 
8
K. Roy and M. Mehendale, "Optimization or Channel Segmentation for Channelled Architecture FPGAs," CICC '92, May 1992, pp. 4.4.1-4.4.4.
 
9
M. Khellah, S. Brown, and Z. Vranesic, "Minimizing Interconnecfion Delays in Array-based FPGAs," Proc. CICC '94, May 1994, pp. 181-184.
 
10
M. Pedram, B. Nobandegani, B. Preas, "Design and Analysis of Segmented Routing Channels for Row- Based FPGAs," IEEE Trans. CAD, Vol. 13, No, 12, December 1994, pp. 1470-1479.
 
11
Altera press release, "Altera Unveils patentetl redundancy technology in high-density programmable logic," August 16, 1996.
 
12
NJ. Howard, A.M.Tyrell, N.M. Allinson, "The Yield Enhancement of FPGAs," IEEE Trans. VLSI Systems, Vol. 2, No. 1, March 1994, pp. 115-123.
13
 
14
 
15
S.J.E. Wilton, J. Rose, Z.G. Vranesic "Memory/Logic Interconnect Flexibility in FPGAs with Large Embedded Memory Arrays," IEEE Custom integmte~l Circuits Conference, May 1996, pp. 144.147.

CITED BY  6

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jonathan Rose: colleagues
Dwight Hill: colleagues