Assessing process-centered software engineering environments

ABSTRACT

Process-centered software engineering environments (PSEEs) are the most recent generation of environments supporting software development activities. They exploit an representation of the process (called the process model that specifies how to carry out software development activities, the roles and tasks of software developers, and how to use and control software development tools. A process model is therefore a vehicle to better understand and communicate the process. If it is expressed in a formal notation, it can be used to support a variety of activities such as process analysis, process simulation, and process enactment. PSEEs provide automatic support for these activities. They exploit languages based on different paradigms, such as Petri nets and rule-based systems. They include facilities to edit and analyze process models. By enacting the process model, a PSEE provides a variety of services, such as assistance for software developers, automation of routine tasks, invocation and control of software development tools, and enforcement of mandatory rules and practices. Several PSEEs have been developed, both as research projects and as commercial products. The initial deployment and exploitation of this technology have made it possible to produce a significant amount of experiences, comments, evaluations, and feedback. We still lack, however, consistent and comprehensive assessment methods that can be used to collect and organize this information. This article aims at contributing to the definition of such methods, by providing a systematic comparison grid and by accomplishing an initial evaluation of the state of the art in the field. This evaluation takes into account the systems that have been developed by the authors in the past five years, as well as the main characteristics of other well-known environments

REFERENCES

• 1: Tarek Abdel-Hamid , Stuart E. Madnick, Software project dynamics: an integrated approach, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1991
• 2: V. Ambriola , P. Ciancarini , C. Montangero, Software process enactment in Oikos, Proceedings of the fourth ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Software development environments, p.183-192, December 03-05, 1990, Irvine, California, United States
• 3: Vincenzo Ambriola , Giovanni A. Cignoni , Carlo Montangero, The Oikos Services for Object Management in the Software Process, Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Software Process Technology, p.2-14, February 07-09, 1994
• 4: Selma Arbaoui , Flavio Oquendo, PEACE: goal-oriented logic-based formalism for process modelling, Software process modelling and technology, Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, UK, 1994
• 5: BALDI, M. AND DALL'ANESE, T. 1995. A distributed object-based system for process model enaction. Tech. Rep., Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
• 6: BANDINELLI, S. 1996. Report on the workshop on Software Process Environment architecture. Softw. Process-Improv. Pract. 2, 1 (Mar.).
• 7: BANDINELLI, S., CERI, S., AND FELDER, M. 1996a. TANGO: A notation for describing advanced transaction models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis (July).
• 8: BANDINELLI, S., DI NITTO, E., AND FUGGETTA, A. 1994a. Policies and mechanisms to support process evolution in PSEEs. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Software Process (ICSP 3). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C.
• 9: Sergio Bandinelli , Elisabetta Di Nitto , Alfonso Fuggetta, Supporting Cooperation in the SPADE-1 Environment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.22 n.12, p.841-865, December 1996 [doi>10.1109/32.553634]
• 10: BANDINELLI, S., DI NITTO, E., FUGGETTA, A., AND LAVAZZA, L. 1994b. Coupled vs. decoupled user interfaces in PSEEs. In Proceedings of the 9th International Software Process Workshop (ISPW 9). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C.
• 11: Sergio Bandinelli , Alfonso Fuggetta , Carlo Ghezzi , Luigi Lavazza, SPADE: an environment for software process analysis, design, and enactment, Software process modelling and technology, Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, UK, 1994
• 12: Sergio Bandinelli , Alfonso Fuggetta , Luigi Lavazza , Maurizio Loi , Gian Pietro Picco, Modeling and Improving an Industrial Software Process, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.21 n.5, p.440-454, May 1995 [doi>10.1109/32.387473]
• 13: BARGHOUTI, N. S. 1994. Separating process model enactment from process execution in Provence. In Proceedings of the 9th International Software Process Workshop (ISPW-9). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C.
• 14: BARGHOUTI, N. S. AND FEILER, P.g. 1993. Demonstration experience report sessions summary. In Proceedings of the 8th International Software Process Workshop (ISPW 8) (Wadern, Germany). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 2-5.
• 15: Israel Z. Ben-Shaul , Gail E. Kaiser, A paradigm for decentralized process modeling and its realization in the Oz environment, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering, p.179-188, May 16-21, 1994, Sorrento, Italy
• 16: R. F. Bruynooghe , R. M. Greenwood , J. Sa , B. C. Warboys , I. Robertson, PADM: towards a total process modelling system, Software process modelling and technology, Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, UK, 1994
• 17: Gérome Canals , Nacer Boudjlida , Jean-Claude Derniame , Claude Godart , Jacques Lonchamp, ALF: a framework for building process-centred software engineering environments, Software process modelling and technology, Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, UK, 1994
• 18: D. Chimenti , R. Gamboa , R. Krishnamurthy , S. Naqvi , S. Tsur , C. Zaniolo, The LDL System Prototype, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, v.2 n.1, p.76-90, March 1990 [doi>10.1109/69.50907]
• 19: Reidar Conradi , Christer Fernström , Alfonso Fuggetta, Concepts for evolving software processes, Software process modelling and technology, Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, UK, 1994
• 20: Reidar Conradi , Chunnian Liu , Marianne Hagaseth, Planning support for cooperating transactions in EPOS, Information Systems, v.20 n.4, p.317-336, June 1995 [doi>10.1016/0306-4379(95)00017-X]
• 21: Reidar Conradi , Marianne Hagaseth , Jens-Otto Larsen , Minh Ngoc Nguyên , Bjørn P. Munch , Per H. Westby , Weicheng Zhu , M. Letizia Jaccheri , Chunnian Liu, EPOS: object-oriented cooperative process modelling, Software process modelling and technology, Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, UK, 1994
• 22: Bill Curtis , Marc I. Kellner , Jim Over, Process modeling, Communications of the ACM, v.35 n.9, p.75-90, Sept. 1992 [doi>10.1145/130994.130998]
• 23: Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Software Process Technology, September 1992
• 24: Elisabetta Di Nitto , Alfonso Fuggetta, Integrating Process Technology and CSCW, Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Software Process Technology, p.154-161, April 03-05, 1995
• 25: Guido Dinkhoff , Volker Gruhn , Armin Sallmann , Michael Zielonka, Business Process Modelling in the Workflow-Management Environment Leu, Proceedings of the13th International Conference on the Entity-Relationship Approach, p.46-63, December 13-16, 1994
• 26: FEILER, P. AND HUMPHREY, W. 1993. Software process development and enactment: Concept and definitions. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Software Process (ICSP 2) (Berlin, Germany). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C.
• 27: Mary F. Fernandez , Stanley B. Zdonik, Transaction Groups: A Model for Controlling Cooperative Transactions, Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Persistent Object Systems, p.341-350, January 10-13, 1989
• 28: FERNSTROM, C. 1993. Process Weaver: Adding process support to UNIX. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Software Process.
• 29: Anthony Finkelstein , Jeff Kramer , Bashar Nuseibeh, Software process modelling and technology, Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, UK, 1994
• 30: FRAILLY, D.J. 1993. Concurrent engineering and the software process. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Software Process (ICSP 2) (Berlin, Germany). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif.
• 31: Alfonso Fuggetta, A Classification of CASE Technology, Computer, v.26 n.12, p.25-38, December 1993 [doi>10.1109/2.247645]
• 32: Alfonso Fuggetta , Carlo Ghezzi, State of the art and open issues in process-centered software engineering environments, Journal of Systems and Software, v.26 n.1, p.53-60, July 1994 [doi>10.1016/0164-1212(94)90095-7]
• 33: Alfonso Fuggetta , Gian Pietro Picco, An annotated bibliography on software process improvement, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.19 n.3, p.66-68, July 1994 [doi>10.1145/182824.182841]
• 34: Alfonso Fuggetta , Alexander L. Wolf, Software Process, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1996
• 35: FUGGETTA, A., CONRADI, R., AND AMBRIOLA, V., Eds. 1991. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Software Process Modeling. AICA (Italian National Association for Computer Science), Milan, Italy.
• 36: Alfonso Fuggetta , Carlo Ghezzi , Dino Mandrioli , Angelo Morzenti, Executable specifications with data-flow diagrams, Software—Practice & Experience, v.23 n.6, p.629-653, June 1993 [doi>10.1002/spe.4380230605]
• 37: FUGGETTA, A., LAVAZZA, L., MORASCA, S., CINTI, S., OLDANO, G., AND ORAZI, E. 1996. Applying G/Q/M in an industrial software factory. Tech. Rep., CEFRIEL, Milano, Italy.
• 38: GARLAN, D. AND SHAW, M. 1993. An introduction to software architecture. In Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, V. Ambriola and G. Tortora, Eds. World Scientific Publishing Co.
• 39: GARG, P. AND JAZAJERI, M. 1996. PSEEs: A grand tour. In Trends in Software: Software Process, A. Fuggetta and W. Wolf, Eds. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
• 40: Pankaj K. Garg , Peiwei Mi , Thuan Pham , Walt Scacchi , Gary Thunquest, The SMART approach for software process engineering, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering, p.341-350, May 16-21, 1994, Sorrento, Italy
• 41: Volker Gruhn , Rüdiger Jegelka, An Evaluation of FUNSOFT Nets, Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Software Process Technology, p.196-214, September 07-08, 1992
• 42: HUFF, K. 1996. Software process modeling. In Trends in Software: Software Process, A. Fuggetta and W. Wolf, Eds. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
• 43: Karen E. Huff , Victor R. Lesser, A plan-based intelligent assistant that supports the software development, Proceedings of the third ACM SIGSOFT/SIGPLAN software engineering symposium on Practical software development environments, p.97-106, November 28-30, 1988, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 44: Shari Lawrence Pfleeger , Hans Dieter Rombach, Measurement Based Process Improvement, IEEE Software, v.11 n.4, p.8-11, July 1994 [doi>10.1109/52.300077]
• 45: IIDA, H., MIMURA, K., INOUE, K., AND TORII, K. 1994. Hakinowa: Monitor and navigation system for cooperative software development. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Software Process.
• 46: G. Junkermann , B. Peuschel , W. Schäfer , S. Wolf, MERLIN: supporting cooperation in software development through a knowledge-based environment, Software process modelling and technology, Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, UK, 1994
• 47: Gail E. Kaiser , Steven S. Popovich , Israel Z. Ben-Shaul, A bi-level language for software process modeling, Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Software Engineering, p.132-143, May 17-21, 1993, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
• 48: Takuya Katayama, A hierarchical and functional software process description and its enaction, Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Software engineering, p.343-352, May 1989, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/74587.74632]
• 49: Marc I. Kellner, Software process modeling example, Proceedings of the 5th international software process workshop on Experience with software process models, p.163-166, October 10-13, 1989, Kennebunkport, Maine, United States
• 50: KORTH, H., KIM, W., AND BANCILHON, F. 1985. A model of CAD transactions. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Very Large Databases. VLDB Endowment, Saratoga, Calif., 25-33.
• 51: Jeff Kramer , Jeff Magee, The Evolving Philosophers Problem: Dynamic Change Management, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.16 n.11, p.1293-1306, November 1990 [doi>10.1109/32.60317]
• 52: Balachander Krishnamurthy , Naser S. Barghouti, Provence: A Process Visualisation and Enactment Environment, Proceedings of the 4th European Software Engineering Conference on Software Engineering, p.451-465, September 13-17, 1993
• 53: LONCHAMP, J. 1993. A structured conceptual and terminological framework for software process engineering. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Software Process (ICSP 2) (Berlin, Germany). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif.
• 54: Jacques Lonchamp, An assessment exercise, Software process modelling and technology, Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, UK, 1994
• 55: Nazim H. Madhavji , Wilhelm Schäfer, Prism-Methodology and Process-Oriented Environment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.17 n.12, p.1270-1283, December 1991 [doi>10.1109/32.106987]
• 56: P. Mi , W. Scacchi, A Knowledge-Based Environment for Modeling and Simulating Software Engineering Processes, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, v.2 n.3, p.283-294, September 1990 [doi>10.1109/69.60792]
• 57: Carlo Montangero, In Favour of a Coherent Process Coding Language, Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Software Process Technology, p.94-97, April 03-05, 1995
• 58: Proceedings of the 5th European Workshop on Software Process Technology, October 1996
• 59: Carlo Montangero , Vincenzo Ambriola, OIKOS: constructing process-centred SDEs, Software process modelling and technology, Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, UK, 1994
• 60: CORPORATE Carnegie Mellon University , Mark C. Paulk , Charles V. Weber , Bill Curtis , Mary Beth Chrissis, The capability maturity model: guidelines for improving the software process, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1995
• 61: PUESCHEL, B. AND WOLF, S. 1993. Architectural support for distributed process-centered software development environments. In Proceedings of the 8th International Software Process Workshop (ISPW 8) (Dagstuhl, Germany, Mar.). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C.
• 62: Selma Arbaoui , Flavio Oquendo, PEACE: goal-oriented logic-based formalism for process modelling, Software process modelling and technology, Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton, UK, 1994
• 63: SCACCHI, W. AND MI, P. 1993. Experiences in the modeling, analysis, and simulation of formalized software processes. In Proceedings of the 8th International Software Process Workshop (ISPW 8) (Dagstuhl, Germany). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif.
• 64: Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Software Process Technology, April 1995
• 65: SCHAFER, W. AND WOLF, S. 1994. Cooperation patterns for process-centered software development environments. Tech. Rep., Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
• 66: A. H. Skarra, Concurrency control for cooperating transactions in an object-oriented database, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, v.24 n.4, p.145-147, April 1989
• 67: Robert A. Snowdon, An Example of Process Change, Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Software Process Technology, p.178-195, September 07-08, 1992
• 68: SUTTON, S. 1993. Opportunity, limitations, and trade-offs in process programming. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Software Process (ICSP 2) (Berlin, Germany). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif.
• 69: Stanley M. Sutton, Jr. , Dennis Heimbigner , Leon J. Osterweil, APPL/A: a language for software process programming, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), v.4 n.3, p.221-286, July 1995 [doi>10.1145/214013.214017]
• 70: Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Software Process Technology, February 1994

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: Computer-aided software engineering (CASE)

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.3 Software Management
          Subjects: Software maintenance; Software development

General Terms:
Human Factors, Languages, Management

Keywords:
CASE, enabling technology, process modeling languages, process-centered software engineering environments, software process