Designing for user acceptance using analysis techniques based on responsibility modelling

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Designing for user acceptance using analysis techniques based on responsibility modelling

Full text

Pdf (238 KB)

Source

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems: common ground table of contents

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Pages: 217 - 218

Year of Publication: 1996

ISBN:0-89791-832-0

Authors

Richard Harper	Rank Xerox Research Centre, 61 Regent Street, Cambridge CB2 1AB, UK
William Newman	Rank Xerox Research Centre, 61 Regent Street, Cambridge CB2 1AB, UK

Sponsor

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 16, Citation Count: 2

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/257089.257289 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Stephen Ackroyd , Keith Soothill , Richard Harper , John A. Hughes , Dan Shapiro, New Technology and Practical Police Work: The Social Context of Technical Innovation, Taylor & Francis, Inc., Bristol, PA, 1992
	2	William Newman , Margery Eldridge , Richard Harper, Modelling last-minute authoring: does technology add value or encourage tinkering?, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems: common ground, p.221-222, April 13-18, 1996, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/257089.257291]
	3	Hughes J.A., Shapiro D.Z., Sharrock W.W., Anderson R.J., Harper R.H.R. and Gibbons S. The Automation of Air Traffic Control. Final Report on SERC/ESRC Grant no. GR/D/86157, 1988.
	4	Olphert C. W. and Harker S. D. P. The ORDIT Method for Organisational Requirements Definition. In Bradley G. E. and Hendricks H. W. (eds.) Human Factors in Organisational Management IV. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 421-426, 1994.
	5	Rebecca Wirfs-Brock, Designing objects and their interactions: a brief look at responsibility-driven design, Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1995

CITED BY 2

	Konrad Tollmar , Ovidiu Sandor , Anna Schömer, Supporting social awareness @ work design and experience, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.298-307, November 16-20, 1996, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
	William Newman , Margery Eldridge , Richard Harper, Modelling last-minute authoring: does technology add value or encourage tinkering?, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems: common ground, p.221-222, April 13-18, 1996, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada