Efficient data consistency in HLA/DIS++

ABSTRACT

Simulation exercises based on the DIS paradigm are faced with a severe scalability limitation due to the use of time out updates or "heartbeat" messages for maintaining consistency despite message loss. Since they carry information that is redundant and useless in most cases, these messages represent a waste of network bandwidth and computational resources. This paper presents an elegant solution that eliminates heartbeats without compromising consistency. Rather than using additional schemes and software components as others have done, the solution proposed here consists of careful use of reliable and unreliable communications based on a key insight into the communication properties of DIS-based simulations. Not only does our solution eliminate heartbeats, it also minimizes additional resource consumption by using reliable communications minimally. Finally, due to its simplicity, it can be easily incorporated into HLA-compliant simulations.

REFERENCES

• 1: Architecture Management Group. 1996. Interface Specification for the HLA, Version 0.5. Working document available from URL: http'// www .dmso.mil/doc slib/hla/IF_S pec_v0.45.doc, Defence Modeling and Simulation Office, Alexandria, Virginia.
• 2: Calvin, J.O., J. Seeger, G.D. Troxel, and D.J. Van Hook. 1995. STOW Realtime Information Transfer and Networking system architecture. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Standards for the Interoperability of Distributed Simulations, 343- 353, Institute for Simulation & Training, Orlando, Florida.
• 3: Dahmann, J.S., and D.C. Wood. 1995. Editors, Special Issue on Distributed Interactive Simulation. Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 83, No. 8.
• 4: DMSO. 1995. DoD Modeling and Simulation Master Plan, Defense Modeling and Simulation Office, Alexandria, Virginia, October 1995.
• 5: McGarry, S., R. Weatherly, and A. Wilson. 1995. The DoD High Level Architecture (HLA) Run-time Infrastructure (RTI) and its relationship to distributed simulation. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Standards for the Interoperability of Distributed Simulations, 595-606, Institute for Simulation & Training, Orlando, Florida.
• 6: Smith, J.E. and D.J. Van Hook. 1996. Comparison of consistency protocol vs. DIS-Lite. In Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Standards for the Interoperability of Distributed Simulations, 875- 884, Institute for Simulation & Training, Orlando, Florida.
• 7: Taylor, D. 1995. DIS-Lite and Query protocol. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Standards for the lnteroperability of Distributed Simulations, 697- 703, Institute for Simulation & Training, Orlando, Florida.
• 8: Van Hook, D.J., J.O. Calvin, and J.E. Smith. 1995. Data consistency mechanisms to support distributed simulation. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Standards for the Interoperability of Distributed Simulations, 797-806, Institute for Simulation & Training, Orlando, Florida.