| A comparison of perturbation analysis techniques |
| Full text |
Pdf
(499 KB)
|
| Source
|
Winter Simulation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 28th conference on Winter simulation
table of contents
Coronado, California, United States
Pages: 295 - 301
Year of Publication: 1996
ISBN:0-7803-3383-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
Michael C. Fu
|
College of Business and Management, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland
|
|
Jian-Qiang Hu
|
Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
IEEE Computer Society
Washington, DC, USA
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 15, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Perturbation analysis (PA) is a technique for estimating gradients of performance measures, particularly applicable to the simulation of discrete-event systems. Over the past two decades, various "versions" have been developed. In this paper, we compare and contrast some of these perturbation analysis techniques by applying them to a simple example. This example also serves to highlight the issue of process representation that can play a very crucial role in the application of perturbation analysis.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Dai, L.. and Y.C. Ho. 1995. Structural infinitesimal perturbation analysis for derivative estimation in discrete event dynamic systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 40:1154-1166.
|
| |
4
|
Fu, M.C. 1994. Optimization via simulation: a review. Annals of Operations Research 53: 199-248.
|
| |
5
|
Fu, M.C. and J. Q. Hu. 1992. Extensions and generalizations of smoothed perturbation analysis in a generalized semi-Markov process framework, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 37: 1483-1500.
|
| |
6
|
Fu, M.C. and J. Q. Hu. 1996. Conditional Monte Carlo: Gradient Estimation and Optimization Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, forthcoming.
|
| |
7
|
Gaivoronski, A., L.Y. Shi, and R.S. Sreenivas. 1992. Augmented infinitesimal perturbation analysis: an alternate explanation, Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications, 2: 121-138.
|
| |
8
|
Glasserman, P. 1991. Gradient Estimation Via Perturbation Analysis, Kluwer Academic.
|
| |
9
|
Gong, W.B. and Y.C. Ho. 1987. Smoothed perturbation analysis of discrete-event dynamic systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 32: 858- 867.
|
| |
10
|
Ho, Y.C. and X.R. Cao. 1991. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems and Perturbation Analysis, Kluwer Academic.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Shi, L. Y. 1996. Discontinuous perturbation analysis of discrete event dynamic systems, to appear in IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.
|
|